Rich Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He's also been lying about Tiote not getting hit in the face. Class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He's also been lying about Tiote not getting hit in the face. Classy. FYP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Has MONg had his press conference yet? not been near any media this morning? edit- has RTG SMB exploded yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 It's hard to tell when it explodes though, it's been in a constant state of meltdown since their first home game of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 TheFA.com @thefadotcom Newcastle and Sunderland charged with misconduct http://t.co/a9Avzd1s Newcastle United and Sunderland have both been charged with misconduct following the match between the two sides on Sunday 4 March 2012. The charge is that the clubs failed to ensure their players conducted themselves in an orderly fashion and/or refrained from provocative behaviour and is in relation to an incident which occurred in the 19th minute following a challenge by Sunderland’s James McClean on Newcastle’s Danny Simpson. Both clubs have until 4pm on 12 March 2012 to respond to the charge. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 McLean could have broke Simpson's leg and should have been off. Anyone deserves jip for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 McLean has such a punchable face. Simpson had him in his pocket , which says a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Didn't think Simpson had pockets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 My mate was wanking himself silly over McLean before the match. One of his favourite players. Loved it when he put on the face and admitted he was shit on Sunday. Be interesting to see how many of those kind of affairs where all players get involved do get any kind of punishment. And how many referees get a word in their ear, even in private, for being absolute level of dogshit ability and helping to intensify said issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Didn't think Simpson had pockets. They only open when stimulated by a potato. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Geordiesned Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 The FA are a f**king joke! They always dodge out of charging the "big" clubs for similar incidents. Bunch of faceless clueless twats! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Is this for a few bad tackles in a derby match? FA need to get their priorities right like, the utter freaks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ocho Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Is this for a few bad tackles in a derby match? FA need to get their priorities right like, the utter freaks. Just for the melee that followed the McClean tackle on Simpson. Handbags and that was it. Ridiculous to charge the teams for that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Is this for a few bad tackles in a derby match? FA need to get their priorities right like, the utter freaks. Nah. A lot of players got together for an argument because their respected referees can't control shit. Not that it happens every other weekend in other, less high profile matches or owt. Much deserved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 But yeah, effectively it's just yet another case of ' Holy shit the media have picked up on something, we need to pull our heads out of our asses and punish them to make it appear we have total control and respectability!'. When all it does is make them look more like reactionary, useless, worthless twats with every passing 'decision'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Don't see the point of charging people for incidents like this really. It was a highly-charged game and the reactions were pretty minor. It's not going to hurt the teams to fine them and it's not going to stop it happening again in future. Pointless and inconsistent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Is this for a few bad tackles in a derby match? FA need to get their priorities right like, the utter freaks. it wasn't for those tackles but for the 20 player coming together. what i can't understand is people saying "but it was a derby" as if the rules should be suspended for derby games. it's as stupid as refs not sending people off for sending off offences as it's too early in the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He's also been lying about Tiote not getting hit in the face. Class. In the slow motion replay you see Tiotes lips quiver and shake from the blow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Is this for a few bad tackles in a derby match? FA need to get their priorities right like, the utter freaks. it wasn't for those tackles but for the 20 player coming together. what i can't understand is people saying "but it was a derby" as if the rules should be suspended for derby games. it's as stupid as refs not sending people off for sending off offences as it's too early in the game. I'd prefer a bit of common sense to be applied. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 If Dean had sent off Clattercunt in the first minute, which he should have, there would have been no 20 man melee. Dean refereed the game abysmally. He could easily have sent 2 mackems off even before Sausagethon got his first use of the soap. Because McPikey's assault on Simpson should've warranted red too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 I'm pretty sure that 'failure to control your players' refers to on any one occasion more than a certain number of players (I think it's 5) surrounding the referee so there's no way we shouldn't be charged - we were against Arsenal too iirc. Think the fine is usually something like £20k, or 2.5 days work for Alan Smith. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 I'm pretty sure that 'failure to control your players' refers to on any one occasion more than a certain number of players (I think it's 5) surrounding the referee so there's no way we shouldn't be charged - we were against Arsenal too iirc. Think the fine is usually something like £20k, or 2.5 days work for Alan Smith. 10mins in a Casino for big Mike, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He's also been lying about Tiote not getting hit in the face. Class. In the slow motion replay you see Tiotes lips quiver and shake from the blow. i tried telling this to some scummy mackem...his response: "could have kicked him in the shins and his lips would have wobbled" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 I'm pretty sure that 'failure to control your players' refers to on any one occasion more than a certain number of players (I think it's 5) surrounding the referee so there's no way we shouldn't be charged - we were against Arsenal too iirc. Think the fine is usually something like £20k, or 2.5 days work for Alan Smith. Fucking 5 If that's the case it makes it even more of a joke. I wouldn't care if they were consistent. That's where the problem lies. How many instances do you see of such a thing? Said it earlier, but I'd really like to see how many times they did actually punish such a thing. Or is it just a case of the media picking up on things again so they decide to take action because of outside influence? Surprise surprise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogmatix Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 I hope I am ok posting this link as it is an offical barclays league Highlights clip available through Yahoo, It shows PERFECTLY how Tiote was assaulted twice http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/football/premier-league/video/allvideos-22327918/hot-or-not-28515738 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now