Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is an utterly pointless thread at the moment like. Until he's played in a 3 under a competent manager there's no point in really discussing it, everything is hypothetical unless that happens. Until then it's just people going 'he's shit' and other people going 'he'd be good in a 3 under a decent manager' over and over but for the usual boring, horse shit dressed up as knowing better from TCD.

 

It's not completely hypothetical given we have over 50 games of evidence which suggests he isn't good enough. Quality players have still impressed throughout this tragic era. Vurn hasn't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's had his chances, he's not taken them.

 

while i'm tempted to agree i think we should not forget who he's been getting these chances under, pardew and carver, and the style of play and quality of coaching both display

 

if we get a decent manager playing a decent system in the summer and he still doesn't flourish then aye he's not taken his chances

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

He's had his chances, he's not taken them.

 

while i'm tempted to agree i think we should not forget who he's been getting these chances under, pardew and carver, and the style of play and quality of coaching both display

 

if we get a decent manager playing a decent system in the summer and he still doesn't flourish then aye he's not taken his chances

 

The sensible and non dramatic way to look at things. By this point I thought most figured out the Pardew effect was real.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anita was given a minimal run and has signed for us when we've been turbo shit. He had a great run which was cut short by that World Class enforcer in Tiote.

 

Santon always ends up being one of better performing defenders when given a run into the side.

 

They've both shown potential and they aren't match winning players though it's not ever in their remit as far as Pardew was concerned. They are part of his don't make mistakes and keep it tight bunch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We conceded bucket loads during Anita's supposed "great run".

 

Santon has directly been responsible for more goals conceded than any of our defenders while he was playing. He's never shown the ability to consistently defend well without the LM holding his hand.

A deep-lying CM and fullback should be able to help "keep it tight".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

This is an utterly pointless thread at the moment like. Until he's played in a 3 under a competent manager there's no point in really discussing it, everything is hypothetical unless that happens. Until then it's just people going 'he's shit' and other people going 'he'd be good in a 3 under a decent manager' over and over but for the usual boring, horse shit dressed up as knowing better from TCD.

 

It's not completely hypothetical given we have over 50 games of evidence which suggests he isn't good enough. Quality players have still impressed throughout this tragic era. Vurn hasn't.

 

Have I not just said that the alternative point to this is that in a 3 in midfield under a decent manager he'd look good?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe he hasn't "always been shit"like I said before, but he hasn't really made an impact. The way you guys talk about him like he's some unearthed Sergio Busquets. On his best day, he's Leon Britton.

 

And maybe we don't "play the way he likes" well tough shit. Adapt then. That's what the best players do. Anita comes off lazy to me. If we don't play the way he likes, leave and go somewhere where they have that philosophy. He seems perfectly content sitting on the bench and collecting his money. I just don't feel this guy is hungry to improve. He plays when he's called upon and never seems to improve.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

There's a lot of made up stuff in that post. No one goes on like he's Busquets, you're saying he's Leon Britton though.

 

Our system is shit imo.

He's not good enough to play in a 2 imo.

I don't think he's lazy at all.

Weird thing to say about him leaving/collecting his money, that's what players do.

Dunno about the hungry to improve thing either way, neither do you.

He's often called upon to play in a system that doesn't suit him.

 

No one's saying he's amazing, it's been the same thing for ages, play him in a 3 or not at all. He's a tidy passer of the ball and reclycles things really well imo, under a decent manager in a 3 he'd look good. Outside of that scenario he's a waste of time here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe he hasn't "always been shit"like I said before, but he hasn't really made an impact. The way you guys talk about him like he's some unearthed Sergio Busquets. On his best day, he's Leon Britton.

 

And maybe we don't "play the way he likes" well tough shit. Adapt then. That's what the best players do. Anita comes off lazy to me. If we don't play the way he likes, leave and go somewhere where they have that philosophy. He seems perfectly content sitting on the bench and collecting his money. I just don't feel this guy is hungry to improve. He plays when he's called upon and never seems to improve.

Leon Britton is brown bread.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...