Dave Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, fucking tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Did amazingly well to finish 5th last season then, seeing as the majority of it was 4-4-2. Poor ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, f***ing tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Yet we thumped Man Utd playing four four fucking two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 How do you know the team Yorkster? He's Dan Gosling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Good team, if so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Krul Simpson Saylor Colo Santon Jonas Tiote Cabaye Ba Cisse Marv Much better system for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Satisfied with that lineup. Looking forward to seeing Marveaux in action. He looked really sharp in pre-season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Sjust on me scores, etc, app. Tis a bit early come to think of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, fucking tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Did amazingly well to finish 5th last season then, seeing as the majority of it was 4-4-2. Poor ffs. No it wasn't, out very good run toward the end of the season was all 4-3-3 until the last two games when we switched back to 4-4-2. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Yeah it won't officially be announced till about 4.30 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, f***ing tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Yet we thumped Man Utd playing four four fucking two. and 2 of our goals came because of "long ball" (even if the jones og was more hilarious than any actual good stuff from us) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Krul Simpson Saylor Colo Santon Jonas Tiote Cabaye Ba Cisse Marv Much better system for me. And how do we know that this is the players that are going to play? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, f***ing tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Yet we thumped Man Utd playing four four fucking two. Played that way to exploit Man Utd's weakness on the day, worked a treat. Not so if you are up against two good headers of the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Sjust on me scores, etc, app. Tis a bit early come to think of it. Thought you were ITK. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, fucking tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Sorry mate, but that's bollocks. I agree to a certain extent that 4-3-3 produces slightly nicer stuff from us, but to say we're poor at 4-4-2 is wrong. For the match today, with the personal available to us, 4-4-2 is certainly the correct decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Krul Simpson Saylor Colo Santon Jonas Tiote Cabaye Ba Cisse Marv Much better system for me. And how do we know that this is the players that are going to play? I was going by the line up posted by someone earlier, they reckoned that was the 11. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Agree with everything else you have to say bimpy474 btw. We play shit with a 4-4-2 when we in a 4-2-3-1 play really good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, fucking tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Did amazingly well to finish 5th last season then, seeing as the majority of it was 4-4-2. Poor ffs. No it wasn't, out very good run toward the end of the season was all 4-3-3 until the last two games when we switched back to 4-4-2. Pretty sure the season's longer than eight games. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, fucking tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Sorry mate, but that's bollocks. I agree to a certain extent that 4-3-3 produces slightly nicer stuff from us, but to say we're poor at 4-4-2 is wrong. For the match today, with the personal available to us, 4-4-2 is certainly the correct decision. Dont mate me, then say it bollocks. Its my opinion, right or wrong. We play better football when we dont play 4-4-2 imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Agree with everything else you have to say bimpy474 btw. We play shit with a 4-4-2 when we in a 4-2-3-1 play really good. Fuck me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Krul Simpson Saylor Colo Santon Jonas Tiote Cabaye Ba Cisse Marv Much better system for me. And how do we know that this is the players that are going to play? I was going by the line up posted by someone earlier, they reckoned that was the 11. Was talking more about the players than the formation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest andrew Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Agree with everything else you have to say bimpy474 btw. We play shit with a 4-4-2 when we in a 4-2-3-1 play really good. we played about 33 games in a straight 4-4-2 and finished 5th, and when we did play 4-3-3 we often changed back to 4-4-2. the league table and pardew disagrees with you. it is proven to work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Stan Collymore @StanCollymore Newcastle Krul/Simpson Perch Taylor Santon/Tiote Cabaye Jonas/Ben Arfa Cisse Ba @talkSPORT LIVE Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 I really don't think Marveaux would be at home in a front three, he's not a forward in the same way Hatem is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 Fed up with this 'oh no 4-4-2, we're doomed' bollocks, fucking tiresome already. Its true though, we play poorly with little creativity and chances. When we play 4-3-3/4-2-3-1 thing type, we create much more. Not saying it for fun, its because its right. Did amazingly well to finish 5th last season then, seeing as the majority of it was 4-4-2. Poor ffs. No it wasn't, out very good run toward the end of the season was all 4-3-3 until the last two games when we switched back to 4-4-2. Pretty sure the season's longer than eight games. And we got lucky in some games, and not in some others, but the better football came when we switched formations imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 18, 2012 Share Posted August 18, 2012 NO COLO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts