nufcjb Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Then we need to properly sue McManaman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Cabaye was done for violent conduct. And this was? fa cup vs brighton last season espn gleefully brought it to everyones attention even though the ref saw it. And he's not english but french whereas mcmannaman is english go figure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Good on the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Strong statement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heake Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 ....And just for dessert...Carver will allmost certainley be fined. Cracking days work by all associated with the FA & officialdom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 ....And just for dessert...Carver will allmost certainley be fined. Cracking days work by all associated with the FA & officialdom fined and banned no doubt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Good statement. Agree with everyone else. If the player injured was more high profile and one of the media's darlings then there is no way this would of been swept under the carpet by the FA. Glad we're not just going to bend over and take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Time for Ashley to get the lawyers in. An absolute ludicrous decision. Disgusting. If the FA and the ref didn't punish the scouse cunt their isn't a court in the land will convict. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 You know something's seriously wrong when Llambias comes out of this sounding extremely professional and respectable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Good statement, can we actually sue them? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 also the club must have been expecting this given how quick that statement was out and how well written it is, fair bet most of it was prepared beforehand Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Cabaye was done for violent conduct. And this was? fa cup vs brighton last season espn gleefully brought it to everyones attention even though the ref saw it. And he's not english but french whereas mcmannaman is english go figure Nah I meant what was this incident if not 'Violent conduct'? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 FA are a bunch of clowns Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Callum McManaman will not be charged over his tackle on Newcastle's Massadio Haidara at the weekend. The Wigan forward caught Haidara on the knee with his follow-through during the second half of Sunday's 2-1 victory at the DW Stadium. Mark Halsey did not punish McManaman at the time, and replays suggested the referee was partially unsighted. But a statement from the Football Association confirmed that "because at least one of the match officials saw the coming together, though not the full extent of the challenge" no further action can be taken. The statement read: "Following consultation with the game's stakeholders in the summer, it was agreed that retrospective action should only be taken in respect of incidents which have not been seen by the match officials. "Where one of the officials has seen a coming together of players, no retrospective action should be taken, regardless of whether he or she witnessed the full or particular nature of the challenge. This is to avoid the re-refereeing of incidents. "In the case of McManaman, it has been confirmed that at least one of the match officials saw the coming together, though not the full extent of the challenge. In these circumstances retrospective action cannot be taken. "The principal objective behind the not seen policy is to address off the ball incidents where match officials are unlikely to be in a position to witness misconduct." McManaman will now be available for Wigan's FA Cup semi-final against Millwall next month. what a load of shit man, talk about covering their arses. wankers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phil K Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The double standards of the FA are staggering. Newcastle need to get a solicitor on this ASAP. I note Derek Lambias has made already attacked the FA saying it was the media NOT the FA who told him, and attacked the old senile delinquent Whelan as well To be fair, it isn't just us who are enraged over this. Talk Sport were furious too Andy Jacobs in particular Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oakie Doke Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 just completely dumbfounded by the whole incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 To avoid "re-refereeing of incidents" doesn't mean a fucking thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 n the thug will be playing at Wembley in a FA Cup semi-final..thug.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Sweet FA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Cowardly cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heake Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Litigation is not the answer, in my opinion. Not sure how much of a shit I give about the moral high ground & that, but surely not many positives can be acheived by persuing a prolonged legal battle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 They re-refereed the Ben Thatcher incident ffs, the fucking gutless liars. Imagine if Tiote had done Steven Gerrard like that ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Cabaye was done for violent conduct. And this was? fa cup vs brighton last season espn gleefully brought it to everyones attention even though the ref saw it. And he's not english but french whereas mcmannaman is english go figure Nah I meant what was this incident if not 'Violent conduct'? ah sorry, then to put it in the words of dave whelan (who will no doubt be on ssn shortly crowing about this) he won the ball clean as a whistle....... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Hope to see a neck high studs up challenge from some Millwall'er. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Jerusalem Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Callum McManaman will not be charged over his tackle on Newcastle's Massadio Haidara at the weekend. The Wigan forward caught Haidara on the knee with his follow-through during the second half of Sunday's 2-1 victory at the DW Stadium. Mark Halsey did not punish McManaman at the time, and replays suggested the referee was partially unsighted. But a statement from the Football Association confirmed that "because at least one of the match officials saw the coming together, though not the full extent of the challenge" no further action can be taken. The statement read: "Following consultation with the game's stakeholders in the summer, it was agreed that retrospective action should only be taken in respect of incidents which have not been seen by the match officials. "Where one of the officials has seen a coming together of players, no retrospective action should be taken, regardless of whether he or she witnessed the full or particular nature of the challenge. This is to avoid the re-refereeing of incidents. "In the case of McManaman, it has been confirmed that at least one of the match officials saw the coming together, though not the full extent of the challenge. In these circumstances retrospective action cannot be taken. "The principal objective behind the not seen policy is to address off the ball incidents where match officials are unlikely to be in a position to witness misconduct." McManaman will now be available for Wigan's FA Cup semi-final against Millwall next month. If that part is true then how can he have been classed as seeing the fucking challenge then. FA are fucking us over yet again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now