Jump to content

Recommended Posts

righty'o just got in, can anybody summarise whats gone on? Pardew today good or bad?

 

More good than last season, but more bad than he should be.

 

 

 

As most of us agree he was above Par the 5th place season, and below Par last season. Can we just agree that this season we are Par due? 7-9th imo.

 

Yes that would probably be about right. We'll get a better idea as the season pans out but I doubt anyone's opinion is going to change overnight about Pardew one way or another. We could finish 7th-9th this season then 15th next. There's always an element of hit and miss with Pardew for me. He'll jumble around with formations and players and then we might hit on a good combination for a while and the results come. Then other teams suss us out and we need to start jumbling again and it goes to shit again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

strange day even for this thread

 

What the hell is that supposed to mean? Are you saying we shouldn't give Pardew credit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange day even for this thread

 

What the hell is that supposed to mean? Are you saying we shouldn't give Pardew credit?

 

I certainly wouldn't trust him with a chequebook.

 

Well this is bullshit for a start. The only players Pardew has ever actively chased to buy were Ba, Ashton, Squidward, Lallana and Lambert.

 

Think he's a got a cracking record personally. O0

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

FFS, more Gifs  :jesuswept:

 

Your predictable response to every single post where I include a number is the boring part of the stats debate.

 

Others have said they appreciate them and commented on points of interest raised.  The argument of stats being bollocks or not is fucking tedious.  I prefer to stick to the footballing discussion, irrespective of the degree to which you think the numbers might illuminate the argument or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

 

 

FFS, more Gifs  :jesuswept:

 

Your predictable response to every single post where I include a number is the boring part of the stats debate.

 

Others have said they appreciate them and commented on points of interest raised.  The argument of stats being bollocks or not is fucking tedious.  I prefer to stick to the footballing discussion, irrespective of the degree to which you think the numbers might illuminate the argument or not.

 

Because the stats, not you, are bollocks. Stats do not tell you everything and can be used to decieve and mislead. They're bollocks. Personally i find gifs funny and stats boring as bollocks, but that's just me.

 

Speaking of stats, do you work out what night to rivet the wife, i mean is it done a percentage scale, worked out by days, months etc. Because you dont half remind of the teacher from Little Britain.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

"stats don't tell you everything" doesn't mean they tell you nothing. this anti-stats crusade is canny retarded imo

 

Kind of retarded to not realise when you say "stats don't tell you everything", by definition that would mean they tell you something and not nothing.

 

Then I suppose being retarded would mean you someone wouldn't realise it, would you not think ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...