Foluwashola Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Hmm, about a year after it's essentially confirmed he's a nonce they've twigged. Oh you're a nonce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Willow Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Adidas have released a statement saying his contract with them has been terminated with immediate effect. Surely he's the best promoter for Predator boots? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Mmmm not sure thats really real, seems like a distinct lack of accents. Course it's not Wasn't being serious, hence the really real ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Free agent? Hmmm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 He's sponsored by speedo but the s fell off jajajajajajaja. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ndegwa Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Free agent? Hmmm. Worth a squirt? Although the trial is young. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Mmmm not sure thats really real, seems like a distinct lack of accents. Course it's not Wasn't being serious, hence the really real ffs. Hmmm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 He's sponsored by speedo but the s fell off jajajajajajaja. That's some TOP 90s banter there m8. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 And to think the mackems thought this was all noncense Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Career over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Sunderland did exactly the right thing tbf. Innocent until proven guilty. Admits guilt, sacked. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Sunderland did exactly the right thing tbf. Innocent until proven guilty. Admits guilt, sacked. Aye - no choice at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 As pointed out on Twitter, he's 5 months left on his contract and will probably go to jail. Sunderland shouldn't have played him after he was charged. They are a disgrace Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b357/sleazycome/FB_IMG_1455184425215.jpg Just seen this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 He probably has enough money already to have a fairly sound life after his stint. The victim and victims family will always have this hanging over their heads. To think some mackems were trying to name the lass and give her abuse online. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfella Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Sunderland did exactly the right thing tbf. Innocent until proven guilty. Admits guilt, sacked. So why did they suspend him initially and then bring him back in? Surely doing the right thing would have meant suspending him until the trial? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Sunderland did exactly the right thing tbf. Innocent until proven guilty. Admits guilt, sacked. So why did they suspend him initially and then bring him back in? Surely doing the right thing would have meant suspending him until the trial? Probably had their hands forced by the PFA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 He probably has enough money already to have a fairly sound life after his stint. The victim and victims family will always have this hanging over their heads. To think some mackems were trying to name the lass and give her abuse online. You'd think so, but something like half of Premier League footballers are bankrupt within 5 years of retiring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 As pointed out on Twitter, he's 5 months left on his contract and will probably go to jail. Sunderland shouldn't have played him after he was charged. They are a disgrace Being charged isn't the same as being guilty though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Sunderland did exactly the right thing tbf. Innocent until proven guilty. Admits guilt, sacked. So why did they suspend him initially and then bring him back in? Surely doing the right thing would have meant suspending him until the trial? I can't answer that, who knows? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 As pointed out on Twitter, he's 5 months left on his contract and will probably go to jail. Sunderland shouldn't have played him after he was charged. They are a disgrace Being charged isn't the same as being guilty though. I suspect in any other job you'd be suspended pending the outcome of the trial especially a charge of that nature and how family friendly football is meant to be. Dunno just dosn't sit well with me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Only having five months left on his contract makes it a much less 'honourable' development. I wonder if they'd have done this if he had longer left. They probably shouldn't have been playing him once charged anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phillipealbert Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 He probably has enough money already to have a fairly sound life after his stint. The victim and victims family will always have this hanging over their heads. To think some mackems were trying to name the lass and give her abuse online. You'd think so, but something like half of Premier League footballers are bankrupt within 5 years of retiring. Call me malicious, but I find it hard to have any sympathy for someone who has pissed away on shite enough money to make many families comfortable and is forced to work for a living, just like the rest of us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Adidas have released a statement saying his contract with them has been terminated with immediate effect. Surely he's the best promoter for Predator boots? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Phillipealbert Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Only having five months left on his contract makes it a much less 'honourable' development. I wonder if they'd have done this if he had longer left. They probably shouldn't have been playing him once charged anyway. Although we now know he is a disgusting child molester and should rightly be smashed, to cancel someone's contract before they have been proven guilty is dodgy ground, legally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts