Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I can't see England not sending a single team to the Q/F, so I feel uneasy for our game next week :unsure:

 

Don't be daft, Barca will destroy city.

Arsenal could quite easily turn up to Stade Louis II and get a 3-0 or 4-1 if they play their best football. Despite the previous result and ASM's fantastic defensive record, there is a gap in quality, imo.

 

One thing I will say about the recent performances of the English teams is that excluding Manchester City and their early group stage adventures, they have simply been given tough draws early on and just haven't been able to make it through. Arsenal seem to draw Barcelona or Bayern in the second round every season. In isolation, not too many of the results would really worry me. Obviously, the trend is alarming, but all it will take for a  one-time reversal is a change in luck of the draw because the Premiership generally has the most or joint most teams in the second round every single season. That is not a coincidence.

You don't think Man City have had tough draws early on? They've invariably had either Bayern and Real Madrid in their group as the first seed, and then another out of Roma, Dortmund, Ajax, Napoli and the like. On the two occasions that they have managed to qualify, it's inevitably been in second place because Bayern or Real are simply better. They've then been dealt a poor hand by drawing Barca twice in a row. Arsenal, on the other hand, have had consistently far easier groups because of their top pot status and can have no complaints whatsoever if they f*** it up by finishing second and end up drawing a good team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody said it was, but they played at a higher pace of football when needed. Most notably when Liverpool needed it against Milan.

 

Never mentioned Chelsea, either. But the one time they won it they weren't really playing pragmatic stuff.

 

You're kidding, aren't you? They typified pragmatism, as they were appreciably worse than the other top sides at the time. That final was a great example of maximizing limited resources. The bastards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing is, English sides used to do so well in the CL because they played a higher pace than teams of often superior technical quality. That's completely gone, now. The coaches in charge of the top 4 - except Pellegrini with his shit defence - all promote a slower more patient pragmatic approach.

 

Liverpool and Chelsea both got far in Europe on the back of playing desparately pragmatic stuff. Arsenal got to the final in 2006 by winning 2 legged ties 1-0 on aggregate. Your argument only really works in favour of Man Utd imo, where Fergie really struck the balance well in his latter years.

 

Don't kid yourself, Liverpool turned it up when they needed to under Rafa. Same with Arsenal in 2006. Our teams don't have that Premier League 6th gear to shift up into now.

 

They both played very pragmatic stuff on their runs to the final in 05/06/07, man. I'm not doubting they were in a clearly better state then, but it wasn't on the back of playing free flowing football. Chelsea and Liverpool played 6 games against each other in that period with 3 goals in total.

 

God, that Chelsea-Liverpool cup rivalry was so mind-numbingly boring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence that Brazil would've won the World Cup had Thiago not gotten a yellow card (very wrongly) against Colombia. Absolute legends both of them.

 

http://worldsoccertalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/brazil-germany2.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

These days Arsenal have to fight to the last game just to scrape 4th. No wonder they don't succeed at this level of the CL.

 

Arsenal aren't even the best team in London, let alone the entire continent. They'll continue to make up the numbers in the same way we do in the PL -good enough to be in there but nowhere near good enough to challenge for the ultimate prize.

 

How many players away are Arsenal from being a team that would challenge for the title do you reckon?

 

IMO they need 4 players right through the spine of their side.  The difference between early Wenger sides and everything since is that they're all puffs now whereas they used to have leaders all over the pitch.  It's a shame like, because they play football the right way.  Imagine how good they'd be with characters like Vieira on the pitch now.  They really need that as they're a total soft touch these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Loved Vieira. Those games with Man United when him and Keane would routinely try and kill each other were class. Don't really see that level of hatred and rivalry between individuals (or teams for that matter) these days. In fact there's just a general lack of mental bastards at the top level of European football right now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence that Brazil would've won the World Cup had Thiago not gotten a yellow card (very wrongly) against Colombia. Absolute legends both of them.

 

http://worldsoccertalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/brazil-germany2.jpg

 

???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence that Brazil would've won the World Cup had Thiago not gotten a yellow card (very wrongly) against Colombia. Absolute legends both of them.

 

http://i.imgur.com/VDjowbk.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence that Brazil would've won the World Cup had Thiago not gotten a yellow card (very wrongly) against Colombia. Absolute legends both of them.

 

http://i.imgur.com/VDjowbk.gif

 

:lol: That gif never gets old, and doesn't matter when it's used as it will always remind me of Kaiz fantastic NFL knowledge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence that Brazil would've won the World Cup had Thiago not gotten a yellow card (very wrongly) against Colombia. Absolute legends both of them.

 

http://i.imgur.com/VDjowbk.gif

:lol: :thup: Fuck outta here Flip.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evidence that Brazil would've won the World Cup had Thiago not gotten a yellow card (very wrongly) against Colombia. Absolute legends both of them.

 

http://i.imgur.com/VDjowbk.gif

:lol: :thup: f*** outta here Flip.

 

As if I was serious. Mike I imagine you being the only one who didn't get it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen the Ibra red card :lol: If anything it's a Oscar foul ffs. PSG will have to get very lucky with the draw to go any further without Ibra IMO.

 

Played way, way better without him last night. Stick Cavani (even though he seems to be finished) up top and pop Lavezzi on the wing, jobs a good 'un.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen the Ibra red card :lol: If anything it's a Oscar foul ffs. PSG will have to get very lucky with the draw to go any further without Ibra IMO.

 

Played way, way better without him last night. Stick Cavani (even though he seems to be finished) up top and pop Lavezzi on the wing, jobs a good 'un.

 

:thup: Not that I think they're better without Ibra but last night they showed they have experience and quality all over the pitch, it's not a one man team. Thought Lavezzi was poor when he came on though, Lucas will be a better option off the bench.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen the Ibra red card :lol: If anything it's a Oscar foul ffs. PSG will have to get very lucky with the draw to go any further without Ibra IMO.

 

Played way, way better without him last night. Stick Cavani (even though he seems to be finished) up top and pop Lavezzi on the wing, jobs a good 'un.

 

That's fair enough but i'll have to see it for a prolonged period of time before i believe it. Not just his goals but his overall intelligence and playmaking they can't really do without at least from what i have seen in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...