Jump to content

Recommended Posts

[emoji38] We're going to the World Cup!

[emoji38] We're gonna qualify for a World Cup!!!!

[emoji38]

 

:lol: Si, man. I fucking HAAAAAAAAAAAATE how much I don't care this week. I feel fucking nothing. I still don't even have a team picked. Fucking non qualifying cunts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

[emoji38] We're going to the World Cup!

[emoji38] We're gonna qualify for a World Cup!!!!

[emoji38]

 

[emoji38] Si, man. I fucking HAAAAAAAAAAAATE how much I don't care this week. I feel fucking nothing. I still don't even have a team picked. Fucking non qualifying cunts.

[emoji38] [emoji38] get behind crazy Mitro.
Link to post
Share on other sites

100% the right choice by FIFA, for once. These nations need to do very little to be able to host a tournament compared to Morocco, which would probably need to build five to six stadiums.

 

Also in favour of the US getting 60 matches compared to Mexico/Canadas 20.

Link to post
Share on other sites

100% the right choice by FIFA, for once. These nations need to do very little to be able to host a tournament compared to Morocco, which would probably need to build five to six stadiums.

 

Also in favour of the US getting 60 matches compared to Mexico/Canadas 20.

 

Not sure why that is so important really, who cares how many stadiums they need to build? Assume it means less profit for FIFA, which is probably a major reason.

 

I think it's a good choice but I don't really get why people assume the WC should just go to the country who is already the most established.

Link to post
Share on other sites

100% the right choice by FIFA, for once. These nations need to do very little to be able to host a tournament compared to Morocco, which would probably need to build five to six stadiums.

 

Also in favour of the US getting 60 matches compared to Mexico/Canadas 20.

 

Not sure why that is so important really, who cares how many stadiums they need to build? Assume it means less profit for FIFA, which is probably a major reason.

 

 

Makes the nations run at a horrible loss and leaves massive empty ghost stadiums that fall apart.

 

https://www.si.com/planet-futbol/2015/02/02/world-cup-stadiums-brazil-south-africa-fifa-white-elephants

Link to post
Share on other sites

100% the right choice by FIFA, for once. These nations need to do very little to be able to host a tournament compared to Morocco, which would probably need to build five to six stadiums.

 

Also in favour of the US getting 60 matches compared to Mexico/Canadas 20.

 

Not sure why that is so important really, who cares how many stadiums they need to build? Assume it means less profit for FIFA, which is probably a major reason.

 

I think it's a good choice but I don't really get why people assume the WC should just go to the country who is already the most established.

 

It’s a tough one, because those who are already established also generally carry the least baggage. But you do want to see new places get a shot. And there aren’t too many places that fit the bill. But I do think Morocco is one of those places.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is great news, fantastic for Canada, first time in ever they'll qualify :) Hopefully get to see some games if they play in Calgary, would need a new stadium here though, so more likely that if they come to Alberta it'll be Edmonton which is 500 miles away from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Morocco were predicting over £4bn profit.

 

Fair point about the legacy.

 

Both Brazil and South Africa predicted profit, they got massive losses - and the cost of arranging a match in one of their stadiums costs more than the team playing their get through ticket sales. It's just not good to give such a massive tournament to a country that doesn't need a massive infrastructure lift. In Brazil's case, that wasn't the stadiums - more the general infrastructure needed to modernize their cities for such an event.

 

It's just how it made no sense for a joing Norway/Sweden Euro bid. Most people into football in both countries (myself included) wants that to happen, but we have no teams that would even fill half of the stadium sizes that would need to exist to host it - after the EC - so even if we'd get an upswing, it'd mean a longtime loss, which is why our politicians scrapped the idea because they are fun ghouls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

I think Morocco were predicting over £4bn profit.

 

Fair point about the legacy.

 

Profit for Fifa, not the host country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...