jdckelly Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 so how long until FIFA bans the U.S because of "political interference in football" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Corruption is a capital offence right? 'murder by cop' is all the rage right now. Let's "hope" none of these dudes j-walks while on bail. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 so how long until FIFA bans the U.S because of "political interference in football" Would be the most Partridgeshrug.gif moment. We'd just start our own goddamn international football organization. With playoffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The WC shouldn't be going to nations that don't have the proper infrastructure, accommodations, transportation and of course sporting stadiums either. If the Cup becomes a positive catalyst for economic growth that can be SUSTAINED, fair enough, but if you're just building shit for sake of it then not having any way of keeping it long-term its pointless. England should have had another WC by now, and the USA should be in line for another as well. I'm biased, but fuck it. I'd also like to see more Cups in Europe as well. Again more biased towards atmosphere and appreciation etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The US DOJ loves taking down people who think they are untouchable in sports - see: Lance Armstrong. Get your popcorn out peoples. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I'm in favour of sometimes sending the world cup to nations with a developing interest in football, in order to promote it. USA '94 etc. Australia would host a fantastic WC i reckon. Kick off times would be naff though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 so how long until FIFA bans the U.S because of "political interference in football" Would be the most Partridgeshrug.gif moment. We'd just start our own goddamn international football organization. With playoffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Just enter a secondary team. Instead of USA, enter USB. May take a few attempts, but you'll get in in the end. This was better in my head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC_Chris Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Yeah, a world cup in Australia would be absolutely fantastic. Should've happened, they were royally shafted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GallowgateKev Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Blatter will get away with it, it'll be the minions who get charged.... Money talks! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GallowgateKev Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I'm in Favour of Tino Asprilla taking over... Sniff and birds for everyone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The WC shouldn't be going to nations that don't have the proper infrastructure, accommodations, transportation and of course sporting stadiums either. If the Cup becomes a positive catalyst for economic growth that can be SUSTAINED, fair enough, but if you're just building s*** for sake of it then not having any way of keeping it long-term its pointless. England should have had another WC by now, and the USA should be in line for another as well. I'm biased, but f*** it. I'd also like to see more Cups in Europe as well. Again more biased towards atmosphere and appreciation etc. The culture of the country should also be taken into account. Awarding the tournament to blatantly racist, sexist and homophobic countries is near enough an endorsement of their ways. FIFA should release a statement saying the competition will only be awarded to countries that meet fit and proper criteria with regards to culture. That way they might actually encourage the likes of Qatar and Russia to implement positive change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The WC shouldn't be going to nations that don't have the proper infrastructure, accommodations, transportation and of course sporting stadiums either. If the Cup becomes a positive catalyst for economic growth that can be SUSTAINED, fair enough, but if you're just building s*** for sake of it then not having any way of keeping it long-term its pointless. England should have had another WC by now, and the USA should be in line for another as well. I'm biased, but f*** it. I'd also like to see more Cups in Europe as well. Again more biased towards atmosphere and appreciation etc. The culture of the country should also be taken into account. Awarding the tournament to blatantly racist, sexist and homophobic countries is near enough an endorsement of their ways. FIFA should release a statement saying the competition will only be awarded to countries that meet fit and proper criteria with regards to culture. That way they might actually encourage the likes of Qatar and Russia to implement positive change. Agree with that too - and to be honest, those countries will never change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 A world cup in Oz would be OK if they didn't use Perth. Still, minging amounts of travel and too much oddly shaped, small stadia. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 A world cup in Oz would be OK if they didn't use Perth. Still, minging amounts of travel and too much oddly shaped, small stadia. Think it would be a joint bid with New Zealand if they did it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The WC shouldn't be going to nations that don't have the proper infrastructure, accommodations, transportation and of course sporting stadiums either. If the Cup becomes a positive catalyst for economic growth that can be SUSTAINED, fair enough, but if you're just building s*** for sake of it then not having any way of keeping it long-term its pointless. England should have had another WC by now, and the USA should be in line for another as well. I'm biased, but f*** it. I'd also like to see more Cups in Europe as well. Again more biased towards atmosphere and appreciation etc. So basically in like 4, 5 countries then. Not many countries have sporting stadiums that fit the criteria for a World Cup. Think the World Cup should be spread out to promote the sport, but it should also be done to improve societies in places where they are being hosted and not a for the sole purpose of robbing the country of even more. England should definitely have one soon, but the US? Had one 20 years ago, they could wait another 10-20 years. Australia have to be in line as well as someone said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 A world cup in Oz would be OK if they didn't use Perth. Still, minging amounts of travel and too much oddly shaped, small stadia. Think it would be a joint bid with New Zealand if they did it. Aye, MCG Suncorp ANZ Allianz Adelaide Oval (?) Wellington basin Dunedin just off the top of my head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I refuse to watch any match in an ovular stadium, it's simply immoral. That is why Australia and New Zealand should be kicked out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GallowgateKev Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Personally think it's about time San Marino had a go P.S is this even a country? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Good job we're not off to Wembley anytime soon then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GallowgateKev Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I'd go to Sydney if only to see the snatch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The WC shouldn't be going to nations that don't have the proper infrastructure, accommodations, transportation and of course sporting stadiums either. If the Cup becomes a positive catalyst for economic growth that can be SUSTAINED, fair enough, but if you're just building shit for sake of it then not having any way of keeping it long-term its pointless. England should have had another WC by now, and the USA should be in line for another as well. I'm biased, but fuck it. I'd also like to see more Cups in Europe as well. Again more biased towards atmosphere and appreciation etc. Someone born in the 90s in Europe will have to wait until they are in their mid 30s (at the earliest, we still don't know what backwards country they'll give it to in 2026) to go to a World Cup unless they could afford to travel half the world for it or go to a horribly homophobic and racist country. I'm born in 1988, so turned 18 just as the World Cup in Germany kicked off, won't have had a chance to go to a World Cup until I'm 38 now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 On a devastating day for Fifa, Chew over the FIFA latest here, as the game's governing body goes into crisis could read this shit all day Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The WC shouldn't be going to nations that don't have the proper infrastructure, accommodations, transportation and of course sporting stadiums either. If the Cup becomes a positive catalyst for economic growth that can be SUSTAINED, fair enough, but if you're just building s*** for sake of it then not having any way of keeping it long-term its pointless. England should have had another WC by now, and the USA should be in line for another as well. I'm biased, but f*** it. I'd also like to see more Cups in Europe as well. Again more biased towards atmosphere and appreciation etc. So basically in like 4, 5 countries then. Not many countries have sporting stadiums that fit the criteria for a World Cup. Think the World Cup should be spread out to promote the sport, but it should also be done to improve societies in places where they are being hosted and not a for the sole purpose of robbing the country of even more. England should definitely have one soon, but the US? Had one 20 years ago, they could wait another 10-20 years. Australia have to be in line as well as someone said. Qatar don't even have enough cities never mind stadia Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Anyone that voted for a world cup to take place in a desert in 40+ heat has clearly taken a few bags of gold and a few hundred camels thrown in for good measure. Insane decision (not that I have anything against the middle east) This! I don't begrudge a massive country like Russia the chance to host a world cup (obviously if they're found guilty of wrong-doing then by all means string them up). But Qatar? For fuck's sake. About as anti-football as you can get a host nation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now