Jump to content

Aleksandar Mitrović


Yaron

How many goals will Mitro score for Fulham this season?  

268 members have voted

  1. 1. How many goals will Mitro score for Fulham this season?

    • 1-5
      0
    • 6-10
      0
    • 11-15
      0
    • 16-20
      1
    • 20+
      1


Recommended Posts

Title change required like.

 

Something of nowt and Lanzini dipping his head as he turns makes it look worse. Wasn't deemed a foul then and had MotD not mentioned it, it probably wouldn't have even been reviewed.

 

Think it's a bit of a disgrace he got the ban to be honest. It may have been needless but it was hardly a fully fledged elbow or done with much (if any malice). Just standard bit of afters that most players will give but because he had a reputation he's been punished.

 

This wouldn't have happened had it have been Kane or one of the top strikers.

 

He will have been told to accept the fine and Rafa will have said you need to control the aggression and use it more wisely and that without being clever he is costing the squad.

 

To completely take that aggression from his game render him useless (or more useless for some of you). He's third choice for me as a striker and based on West Ham, Joselu would be first. But it's early days.

 

Overall I think top level football is just getting a bit of a joke tbh. Too poncey and sanitised. The passion is being sucked out of it.

 

To me it's probably just the people who don't rate Mitro complaining cause they have a chance to rather than seeing it without bias.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

Heron, surely you don't believe that pile of tripe you have posted? It was a stupid pointless elbow to the face that wasn't needed. No matter who had done it, it was just a thick thing to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules.

 

Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games.

 

Superb.

 

Is the only genuine complaint we can have. He's still an idiot and a liability, it deserved a ban.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heron, surely you don't believe that pile of tripe you have posted? It was a stupid pointless elbow to the face that wasn't needed. No matter who had done it, it was just a thick thing to do.

I didn't dispute that it was needless and a bit stupid. Just that it's also being made more than it was and that it probably goes on all game. It looks worse because Lanzini is turning otherwise it'd probably have been nowhere near his face and nowt would be being said. 10-15years ago he would never be getting the retrospective ban for me like.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules.

 

Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games.

 

Superb.

 

Do we even know what the ref said about the incident ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules.

 

Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games.

 

Superb.

 

Is the only genuine complaint we can have. He's still an idiot and a liability, it deserved a ban.

Wether we think Mitrovic is guilty or not is neither here nor there .They have clearly made up the rules as they go with this one. If this was happening to any of the top clubs there'd be absolute hell on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules.

 

Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games.

 

Superb.

 

Do we even know what the ref said about the incident ?

 

No, so figures talking BS as per usual unless he has 1st hand access to PL match reports by referees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...