Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Think people are just missing being able to moan about the refs decisions and so feel lost. So now their moaning at the new technology. Makes perfect sense.

 

People more than anything just love to moan. It's a huge turn on for them.

 

:lol: Whatever.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's made it interesting.

 

Not for those against VAR, still 2-4 for in their football purist minds. ;)

 

I back Vars, just need to speed it up, whack a big screen up so the fans know what's happening, can't be that hard. And Liverpool are still in it, and rightly so because of Vars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think people are just missing being able to moan about the refs decisions and so feel lost. So now their moaning at the new technology. Makes perfect sense.

 

People more than anything just love to moan. It's a huge turn on for them.

Nah. More that in a lot of cases it doesn't clear anything up (that pen for example) then the whole idea of the occasions during the game on which it's used.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think people are just missing being able to moan about the refs decisions and so feel lost. So now their moaning at the new technology. Makes perfect sense.

 

People more than anything just love to moan. It's a huge turn on for them.

 

Kaka - Herping the Derp 24/7

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

You do in Rugby League which is a rapid fast flowing sport, as it is without rucks and mauls, and it's no worse for it. Even if the ref gets decisions wrong, as in offside or knock ons. Those decisions stay as they are, no need for Football to be any different imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

You don't even have to go that small; throw-ins and corners are disputed many, many times in every game. And yet both can lead directly to a goal (in the case of throw-ins, consider long throws, or quick throws to bypass the offside rule). So do we check throw-ins and corners with VAR before they are taken? Only go back if they lead to a goal? How far back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

It's true like. For example, if you watch BTTF, before they go back in time, the place is called Twin Pines Mall, however, because in 1955 Marty McFly accidentally hits one of the pines, when he goes back to the future it's called Lone Pine Mall. Small details are fucking huge man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

You do in Rugby League which is a rapid fast flowing sport, as it is without rucks and mauls, and it's no worse for it. Even if the ref gets decisions wrong, as in offside or knock ons. Those decisions stay as they are, no need for Football to be any different imo.

Isn't that a bit daft though.  Bring it in for some decisions but not others.?
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

It's true like. For example, if you watch BTTF, before they go back in time, the place is called Twin Pines Mall, however, because in 1955 Marty McFly accidentally hits one of the pines, when he goes back to the future it's called Lone Pine Mall. Small details are fucking huge man.

 

:lol: How long have you been a dick?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

You do in Rugby League which is a rapid fast flowing sport, as it is without rucks and mauls, and it's no worse for it. Even if the ref gets decisions wrong, as in offside or knock ons. Those decisions stay as they are, no need for Football to be any different imo.

 

Posted this before, whenever I watch rugby league it seems like every single try is reviewed. It's almost like a feature on Sky. Don't watch loads, maybe it's just a coincidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sewelly makes really good points about how smaller decisions are game-changing decisions too as well as bigger decisions because the game is constantly flowing. You can't just ignore the smaller decisions so if VAR comes in place surely it should be looking at every decision in the match. Which would be torturous

 

You don't even have to go that small; throw-ins and corners are disputed many, many times in every game. And yet both can lead directly to a goal (in the case of throw-ins, consider long throws, or quick throws to bypass the offside rule). So do we check throw-ins and corners with VAR before they are taken? Only go back if they lead to a goal? How far back?

Better Still an innocuous foul could lead to a booking which could be a second yellow. Will that be reviewed. Will a second booking for time wasting be reviewed to see if he really was hobbling etc.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...