Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah but he didn't actually remove his head so.i can see why it was a yellow.  They are clueless, Gerrard and Jenas were commenting onthe Alli dive and gjving it the 'definite penalty he anticipated the contact and is entitled to go down'  line.

It was so similar to Lanzini's but was not reviewed.  This panel will be disbanded soon because there is no consistency and there will be uproar at the obvious bias

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

That off the ball incident from King :lol: would be a ten game ban for Mitro that

 

Incredible that they said on MOTD that this incident and the kick in the face, were not red cards.

 

Nee idea what they were going on about, both were absolutely certain red cards and ‘intent’ doesn’t even come into it.

 

Exactly, it's dangerous play even if he didn't mean it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wagner: "they were probably both penalties."

Hughes: "ours was a penalty, there's was not."

Danny Murphy: "herpa derp derp."

 

Grim.

 

Enjoyed Murphy saying they didn't need to analyse if the Bournemouth equaliser was a handball or not because the goal was given by the referee

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wagner: "they were probably both penalties."

Hughes: "ours was a penalty, there's was not."

Danny Murphy: "herpa derp derp."

 

Grim.

 

Enjoyed Murphy saying they didn't need to analyse if the Bournemouth equaliser was a handball or not because the goal was given by the referee

 

:lol: He's a fucking div, Murphy. Probably the worst they have on that sofa.

 

Shearer is genuinely the best, no bias.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

Shearers added humour and passion to his punditry which along with his often astute analysis makes him for me the best in the country, he’s well spoken too and doesn’t sound like a plank like ‘Cara’ and Garry G...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wagner: "they were probably both penalties."

Hughes: "ours was a penalty, there's was not."

Danny Murphy: "herpa derp derp."

 

Grim.

 

Enjoyed Murphy saying they didn't need to analyse if the Bournemouth equaliser was a handball or not because the goal was given by the referee

 

:lol: He's a fucking div, Murphy. Probably the worst they have on that sofa.

 

Shearer is genuinely the best, no bias.

 

I can't help but feel Shearer thinks the same of Murphy. I swear whenever I watch MOTD and Murphy says one of his inane things, Shearer either can't help but disagree or just glances at him with a look as if saying to himself 'pick your battles, there's just not enough time in the world for this ballbag'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah Murphy was a decent player, good passer, eye for goal etc. Much better than Shelvey for example.

 

He's such a bad pundit though.

 

There was a point when Shearer and Wright were bad pundits. But at least (Wright has always been a character) they were great players. Shearer arguably the best the PL had ever seen and Wright a top 10.

 

Murphy was decent. Why is he on the tele? Never managed at any level. A handy but unspectacular PL player. A crap pundit. No charm. Ugly as owt.

 

Compared to Sky - at least the pundits were mostly really good players. Often get in ex-Managers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

Wright is a shit pundit when it comes to analysis, but he’s funny, inoffensive and likeable in many ways. There is a natural chemistry with his co pundits. The likes of Murphy though... brings nowt to the table.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wright is a s*** pundit when it comes to analysis, but he’s funny, inoffensive and likeable in many ways. There is a natural chemistry with his co pundits. The likes of Murphy though... brings nowt to the table.

 

Wright is much improved imo. Much like Shearer his analysis of strikers - their movement and patterns of finishing is top notch. He also seems to do his research (except when it comes to his mate Pardew - and I believe they are literal mates and he doesn't try to hide that bias). Wright has made the effort to improve imo.

 

But like you say... if you disregard all of that. At the very least there's personality, wit and a bit of charm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

Wright is a s*** pundit when it comes to analysis, but he’s funny, inoffensive and likeable in many ways. There is a natural chemistry with his co pundits. The likes of Murphy though... brings nowt to the table.

 

Wright is much improved imo. Much like Shearer his analysis of strikers - their movement and patterns of finishing is top notch. He also seems to do his research (except when it comes to his mate Pardew - and I believe they are literal mates and he doesn't try to hide that bias). Wright has made the effort to improve imo.

 

But like you say... if you disregard all of that. At the very least there's personality, wit and a bit of charm.

 

He’s bang on about strikers, but outside of that area, he’s shit. I like Wright though, apart from when he’s talking about Pardew or us. As for Murphy being ugly though... :lol: who cares!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...