Groundhog63 Posted Saturday at 07:58 Share Posted Saturday at 07:58 3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: They apparently do have loads to spend. Need to buy a brighter light bulb, methinks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarie4 Posted Saturday at 10:55 Share Posted Saturday at 10:55 2 hours ago, Izakaya said: What is it with Arsenal and being terrified of strikers? The old 'Arsenal try to walk it in' meme has been around since the 90s. Arsenal splashed out sixty-odd million and a crazy two hundred grand a week for Havertz to play striker, right? They also got Jesus the summer before for forty-odd million. That's over a hundred million on strikers in two summers! So it's bogus to say they haven't bought a striker. They did, but whether they're any good is besides the point. The money was spent. Highly doubt they have room in that position for an elite signing their fans are clamouring for unless they offload one of Jesus or Kai. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted Saturday at 12:26 Share Posted Saturday at 12:26 They buy strikers who aren’t really strikers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted Saturday at 13:35 Share Posted Saturday at 13:35 1 hour ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: They buy strikers who aren’t really strikers. Think arteta loves the false 9 shit. Honestly think it doesn't work as well as an out and out striker. Pep agreed and brought in Haaland. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted Saturday at 15:31 Share Posted Saturday at 15:31 Neither Arsenal and Man City play a way where they need out and out strikers though. Haaland scores goals, but can't help but feel despite the goals his net contribution to the team is negative with his average 3.5 touches of the ball every game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted Saturday at 16:06 Share Posted Saturday at 16:06 34 minutes ago, Conjo said: Neither Arsenal and Man City play a way where they need out and out strikers though. Haaland scores goals, but can't help but feel despite the goals his net contribution to the team is negative with his average 3.5 touches of the ball every game. City were a better side without him imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Saturday at 19:59 Share Posted Saturday at 19:59 3 hours ago, El Prontonise said: City were a better side without him imo. Completely agree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Annoyingly the right type of profile they need in CM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago I'd love him at us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Arsenal need 2 top quality attackers. Martinelli is not at the level. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted 15 minutes ago Share Posted 15 minutes ago Man U supposedly confident in getting Delap Someone I'd like here, as well as Cunha (not saying they'd both be the best use of our potential budget mind). So hope they don't win Europa in case it makes a difference to their targets Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
southernmag Posted 3 minutes ago Share Posted 3 minutes ago 1 hour ago, The Prophet said: Surely we should be in on this. Napoli are a good side but still. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now