Other clubs' transfers

[Menace]

Double edged sword really, good player but his wages will throw clubs off and rightly so. He was very good for Barca, although I can see why they're not willing to give him a multi year contract with his wages and his age.

[nufcjmc]

9 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Think he’ll have a great 2-3 year deal market next summer if he’s available for free.   

I agree 2 or 3 years on the free market but don't blame manu for not wanting him walking for nothing.

 

25/30 offered to barca seems more than fair but the package obviously player wages (no idea if they were getting his full wage supplemented or not) plus a 4 or 5 year deal I can see why they would prefer to be cheeky and do a loan.

 

May depend if they get another taker if he has a good WC I can still see someone paying a fee for him.

 

[St1pe]

53 minutes ago, The Butcher said:

Stinks of Villa imo.

Had a great spell there actually. It’d probably be a good signing for both parties 

[Optimistic Nut]

I'd only have him here if he was cheap and Barnes left. Think he'd be a good Barnes replacement but don't want both as the options for LW. 

[toon25]

Sancho released. What a complete and utter waste of fucking money.

 

Utter, utter, shit.

[r0cafella]

Just now, toon25 said:

Sancho released. What a complete and utter waste of fucking money.

 

Utter, utter, shit.

Zero consequences for what is probably the most expensive flop in premier league history. I love PSR. 

[KaKa]

What's even funnier is seeing all these clips of Man United fans (and other "top club" fans tbf) squealing about how "ridiculous" the market is because of the fees being quoted for Tonali, Anderson, West Ham's Fernandes and Scott at Bournemouth.

 

The unmitigated gall of them man 

[r0cafella]

Just now, KaKa said:

What's even funnier is seeing all these clips of Man United fans (and other "top club" fans tbf) squealing about how "ridiculous" the market is because of the fees being quoted for Tonali, Anderson, West Ham's Fernandes and Scott at Bournemouth.

 

The unmitigated gall of them man 

They don't understand it's them who actually benefit from these sky high fees. They've inflated the market to a point only they can shop in it. 

 

Everyone else literally has to gamble. 

[KaKa]

1 minute ago, r0cafella said:

They don't understand it's them who actually benefit from these sky high fees. They've inflated the market to a point only they can shop in it. 

 

Everyone else literally has to gamble. 

 

Yeah, true. But at the same time I'm happy everyone is forcing them to pay through the nose when they show up.

 

At some point it's going to start to backfire. It's up to the other clubs to continue to evolve and improve on their ability to identify and sign players from elsewhere at better value, with the huge fees they're ripping off those clubs for.

[The College Dropout]

Many factors of course - leadership being in shambles and rapists and everyone knowing it about it being number 1 - but a major reason for West Ham's relegation is £20m-£Max Kilman transfers flopping. Not being able to absorb that has got them relegated. So for a success - they need major money.

[Menace]

Just waiting for Froggy to do mental gymnastics regarding Sancho fee and how actually Man Red profited from the transfer