Jump to content

Joelinton: will not play against Everton (Howe)


Recommended Posts

Stinks of Mitro in his season under McClown. As it was always going to be.

 

Does a bit. Sign foreign, expensive, undeveloped forward > watch him fail. Replace him with proven, experienced forward to build the team around > watch him succeed. Get rid, sign foreign, expensive, undeveloped forward > watch him fail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

He seems more of a 2nd striker. Secure Rondon, and play Joelinton off him and he'd look better.

 

Just a stupid club.

 

He certainly prefers to be playing deeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He only plays deeper because he has no coach telling him to stay in between their centre backs and more importantly, no midfielders giving him the ball in that position.

 

Classic case of a striker dropping deeper because hes getting no service, then being isolated in the middle of the pitch and losing confidence in the process.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally bemuses me how anyone with a brain thought this was going to work out. He can be as good as he wants but you are NEVER going to recoup £40m for a relegated striker, especially not when he's playing in a system and team as poor as we have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stinks of Mitro in his season under McClown. As it was always going to be.

 

Mitrovic is better. Joelinton would have been a good partner for Rondon. He has a good touch, moves well. Leading the line is not his game right now.

 

mitro had scored plenty of goals before we signed him, even if they were in lesser leagues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's got a good touch and some nice things about his game but his finishing, specifically his heading looks a bit weak at this stage.

 

Very early days of course mind and there's a fair few 30-40 million players around the league now plenty of who aren't exactly tearing it up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole deal is so strange and dodgy.

 

Aye I'd love to know the ins and outs, nothing about it feels genuine. They were more bothered about getting him than they were about keeping Rafa. Suspect the deal was done at the beginning of the year when we were first linked.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what percentage of elite level transfers have been concluded based on a management team having analysed the attributes of a particular player and determined that they would suit an identified role in a team. There's certainly something disingenuous (as in, their signings weren't strictly 'football decisions') about the likes of Joelinton and Saint-Maximin, especially considering they had the same agent. But there's no way we're alone in securing transfers that might not have everything to do with creating a functioning team.

 

It makes you wonder how or why the likes of Cabaye, Debuchy, Sissoko, Santon, Gouffran, Haidara, Cisse, Mbemba, Yanga-Mbiwa, Rivieire, Mitrovic, Wijnaldum, Thauvin, Cabella, Janmaat ended up here. Of course, some of them fitted into a position where we were lacking, for sure, but none of them ever felt like they had a great deal to do with the management team - even if Pardew or McClaren had a modicum of a say-so. Even going as far back to Jonas - his transfer was scrutinised shortly after he arrived, iirc. I'm not saying there's anything untoward or illegal - they're just not decisions grounded in football strategy.

 

You just feel a bit suspicious about every incoming transfer from the continent; it feels like the likes of Carr, Nickson and those incoming players are functioning within another arm of the business, separate to the one which operates on football pitches.

 

The only times when it feels like players have been chosen specifically by the football people is on the two occasions we've dropped to the Championship, when the intervention from the 'policy' side is less invasive towards the 'football' side. Funny how whenever the latter is allowed to operate close to its fullest extent, we win football leagues...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole deal is so strange and dodgy.

 

Aye I'd love to know the ins and outs, nothing about it feels genuine. They were more bothered about getting him than they were about keeping Rafa. Suspect the deal was done at the beginning of the year when we were first linked.

 

At the point of signing, Charnley mentioned that talks had been ongoing for a long while, which Rafa later expressed that he was not aware of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...