Jump to content

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, LeeB said:

 

It was me who posted that. Was told by a pal of mine who owns a couple of the bars nearby.

Interesting. Heard anything recently?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LeeB said:

 

I packed in the booze in August so haven't seen him since then :lol:

 

Will ask and see if he's heard any more.

Good man

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Decky said:

Trips was wearing the armband.

 

This is the minimum and probably contractual.  The fact that the clubs most prominent media platform has clearly not referenced it - when from memory, they always have previously - is sickening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, et tu brute said:

Surprised, didn't they do it last year?

 

Not sure specifically what it was but I'm sure the club account has supported LGBT stuff post takeover before because I remember Owen Jones criticising it on Twitter. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

Dunno why people care like, it's the difference between the 80% owners being murderous homophones or being hypocritical, murderous homophobes. Kind of meaningless isn't it.

Yep,  damned if you do damned if you dont scenario.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Dunno why people care like, it's the difference between the 80% owners being murderous homophones or being hypocritical, murderous homophobes. Kind of meaningless isn't it.

For me it’s about to which degree they’re influencing/controlling the club. It’s obvious which way it’s going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

Dunno why people care like, it's the difference between the 80% owners being murderous homophobes or being hypocritical, murderous homophobes. Kind of meaningless isn't it.

 

 

 

 

I hoped when this takeover happened that NUFC would have a positive influence on how Saudi Arabia behaves. That for me would be enormously positive.

 

I'll be very annoyed if Saudi Arabia instead has a negative influence on how NUFC behaves. That for me would be quite disgusting.

 

This is a hint which way it might be going. As others have said, hopefully it's just a clerical error, or someone forgot. We'll see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, I know from friends in the community that these things can be seen as pretty shallow corporate platitudes but I still really don't like this at all. Not taking part sends a terrible message.

 

NUFC's community values should not be defined by the owners. 

 

 

Edited by Gallowgate Toon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...