Elliottman Posted Sunday at 15:59 Share Posted Sunday at 15:59 Just watched the main event and saw them. That’s a mad 4some, Trump, Musk, Yassir and Kid Rock. Is there a glitch in the World at the moment?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joelinton7 Posted Sunday at 18:08 Share Posted Sunday at 18:08 2 hours ago, Elliottman said: Just watched the main event and saw them. That’s a mad 4some, Trump, Musk, Yassir and Kid Rock. Is there a glitch in the World at the moment?! Aye, the US president, owner of Twitter/luncatic who sends rockets to space, Kid Rock and the chairman of Newcastle United. Someone definitely killed a fish or windmilled a butterfly somewhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieT Posted Tuesday at 21:38 Share Posted Tuesday at 21:38 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Tuesday at 21:58 Share Posted Tuesday at 21:58 On 17/11/2024 at 21:21, PauloGeordio said: Newcastle chairman Yasir Al-Rumayyan enjoying front-row seats at #UFC309 alongside Donald Trump and Elon Musk. We is big! Yasir peddling Miggy to The Orange one! PIF funded Musk’s Twitter takeover. Can’t say it makes me any less comfortable than I was before - Trump is an authoritarian at minimum, and a fascist at worst, and Musk’s cunt bone fides are an open book. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted yesterday at 06:18 Share Posted yesterday at 06:18 Musk must be the ultimate Bond villan at this stage, Rockets, mates with politics people, running media communication, 007 has got his work cut out with this one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted yesterday at 06:40 Share Posted yesterday at 06:40 8 hours ago, GeordieT said: For the record, issuing new shares is!’t allowed from a PSR perspective. You are allowed to do it, but it doesn’t count towards your income. So if this is for January, then it would mean that we are allowed to spend another £35m that the club doesn’t currently have. It could be used for anything else non-football related. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
500bhp Posted yesterday at 08:35 Share Posted yesterday at 08:35 1 hour ago, Stifler said: For the record, issuing new shares is!’t allowed from a PSR perspective. You are allowed to do it, but it doesn’t count towards your income. So if this is for January, then it would mean that we are allowed to spend another £35m that the club doesn’t currently have. It could be used for anything else non-football related. It'll be for liqudity/cashflow purposes. It has no impact at all on PSR headroom or calculations. You can issue new share capital whenever you want, PSR does not prohibit this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted yesterday at 08:47 Share Posted yesterday at 08:47 2 hours ago, Stifler said: For the record, issuing new shares is!’t allowed from a PSR perspective. You are allowed to do it, but it doesn’t count towards your income. So if this is for January, then it would mean that we are allowed to spend another £35m that the club doesn’t currently have. It could be used for anything else non-football related. Is it not just the standard allowable annual injection of cash from owners? It’s £105M over a three year period IIRC, so £35M a year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted yesterday at 08:50 Share Posted yesterday at 08:50 2 minutes ago, Rich said: Is it not just the standard allowable annual injection of cash from owners? It’s £105M over a three year period IIRC, so £35M a year. Don't think so. The 105m/3 year rolling is allowable losses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted yesterday at 08:52 Share Posted yesterday at 08:52 1 minute ago, Unbelievable said: Don't think so. The 105m/3 year rolling is allowable losses. I thought owners are allowed to provide that same level of secure funding over three years, by way of equity injection, etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted yesterday at 08:54 Share Posted yesterday at 08:54 Just now, Rich said: I thought owners are allowed to provide that same level of secure funding over three years, by way of equity injection, etc. The cap UB is referring to is inclusive of this funding laughably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted yesterday at 08:58 Share Posted yesterday at 08:58 Just had a quick look, and it’s £90M of owner-injected funding allowed over three years: ‘Premier League clubs can... Make 'allowable' losses of up to £5m/season (averaged over three seasons) Increase that figure to £35m/year with owner investment (averaged over three seasons)’ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted yesterday at 09:00 Share Posted yesterday at 09:00 1 minute ago, Rich said: Just had a quick look, and it’s £90M of owner-injected funding allowed over three years: ‘Premier League clubs can... Make 'allowable' losses of up to £5m/season (averaged over three seasons) Increase that figure to £35m/year with owner investment (averaged over three seasons)’ This is why squad cost terrifies me btw. Especially if the owner investment component is removed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 3 hours ago, Rich said: Just had a quick look, and it’s £90M of owner-injected funding allowed over three years: ‘Premier League clubs can... Make 'allowable' losses of up to £5m/season (averaged over three seasons) Increase that figure to £35m/year with owner investment (averaged over three seasons)’ They’re accounting losses - it doesn’t necessarily mean that the club is only running up a £35m deficit in a season. The injection is likely to cover salaries etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KetsbaiaIsBald Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago Stolen from Reddit. This has been all the injections. it’s been 7 months since the last one of a similar amount. https://bsky.app/profile/gamestateuk.bsky.social/post/3lbdfqwx3jk2b Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 2 minutes ago, KetsbaiaIsBald said: Stolen from Reddit. This has been all the injections. it’s been 7 months since the last one of a similar amount. https://bsky.app/profile/gamestateuk.bsky.social/post/3lbdfqwx3jk2b Oh you mean CASH injections? I thought you meant.......something else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, TheBrownBottle said: They’re accounting losses - it doesn’t necessarily mean that the club is only running up a £35m deficit in a season. The injection is likely to cover salaries etc. It's a big gap though, £430m vs. £105m covering allowable of losses in the three years since the takeover. Maybe part of it was clearing the loan that transferred from Ashley? But that's still a big difference. It would be interesting to understand how the difference is accounted for because I doubt our infrastructure, women's team and youth spending is anywhere near that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keegans Export Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, Jackie Broon said: It's a big gap though, £430m vs. £105m covering allowable of losses in the three years since the takeover. Maybe part of it was clearing the loan that transferred from Ashley? But that's still a big difference. It would be interesting to understand how the difference is accounted for because I doubt our infrastructure, women's team and youth spending is anywhere near that. Presumably at least part of it will be our favourite word - amortisation. eg. Isak cost £63m, I'm not sure how much of that was paid up-front but assuming all/most of it then we'd need £63m cash but only £12.6m would be on the years accounts. There's £50m straight away. Gordon I'm fairly sure was £45m cash because Everton needed the money so that's £45m versus £10-15m on the accounts. Edited 19 hours ago by Keegans Export Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now