Jump to content

Do you still back Eddie Howe?  

735 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes
      117
    • No
      92


Recommended Posts

Just now, Ronson333 said:

 

 

He's said this about himself before which worries me. It wasn't that long ago and he's already let himself down again. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our best season from him was the 4th season. That was built on winning against the teams we were supposed to beat. I remember a stat about not losing a single game against bottom half opponents then.

This season is the exact opposite, but unfortunately we're not pulling the results from the big games either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the biggest problem is still the lack of top quality players in our squad. We’re just not able to reliably keep the ball well enough and pass it decisively enough to create that many good chances. And this is also the reason we can’t keep possession and really dominate a match. 
 

Probably with Bruno, Tonali and Mikey available we would look a lot more confident. 

 

 

Edited by AyeDubbleYoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Doctor Zaius said:

If I see one more stupid cunt talk about credit in the bank man. It's fucking irrelevant. 

 

You base decision off what he's able to achieve going forward. 

 

Aye, Howe deserves to be treated and talked about with respect for what he's done here.  But the idea we should pretend he's good enough out of loyalty is completely crazy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NUFCDoog said:

It all depends on how serious PIF and that are about us, im not convinced that they haven't lost interest.

 

If they seriously want us to be competing he'll go this summer as finishing where we're likely to finish, with some of the results we've had are unacceptable. Losing twice to Sunderland wont mean anytbing to PIF mind, they'll be looking at overall, under Shepherd I think Howe would be gone tomorrow. But they'll see no Europe as a disaster and will sack him, go all out for a big name and authorise funds for the summer.

 

If, as I suspect, theyre just not that arsed anymore, I imagine he'll stay, we'll sell a few players, have pittance to spend and just end up around mid table again. We've been a mid table team all season so its where we deserve to finish, my major worry now is that is what we're destined to be.

All makes sense until the end

 

we didn’t spend a pittance last season

 

we literally have maxed out PSR and they’ve invested since they came in 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Beren said:

 

Is this true? (Not clued up on this).

It’s no secret Howe and Mitchell had very different views on recruitment. Howe won the power struggle and Mitchell walked.

 

Officially it was because of Eales leaving… but let’s be honest, nobody actually believes that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beren said:

 

Is this true? (Not clued up on this).

 

I don't think anything has cone out about why he left, but his comments about our recruitment not being fit for purpose point towalds there having been some conflict there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Teasy said:

 

Aye, Howe deserves to be treated and talked about with respect for what he's done here.  But the idea we should pretend he's good enough out of loyalty is completely crazy.


But that’s not what credit in the bank really means, is it? It means he’s shown he’s a good manager :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

I think the biggest problem is still the lack of top quality players in our squad. We’re just not able to reliably keep the ball well enough and pass it decisively enough to create that many good chances. And this is also the reason we can’t keep possession and really dominate a match. 

Look at the relative tools at the disposal of the two managers today - that shitshow was the result of a disparity in quality in favour of Sunderland?  And who signed those players?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Milburn said:

It’s no secret Howe and Mitchell had very different views on recruitment. Howe won the power struggle and Mitchell walked.

 

Officially it was because of Eales leaving… but let’s be honest, nobody actually believes that.

The question was specifically about a shortlist.  Is that true or did you make that up as a stick to beat Howe with? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:


Sure but you judge that on more than just the last few months don’t you? 

 

Well you judge it off whatever parameters you see fit really. 

 

Sentimentality has nothing to do with it though. Results are the be all and end all

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Milburn said:

Mitchell left because he deemed a shortlist containing players such as Wissa ‘not fit for purpose’. 

Fake news AFAIK. Not fit for purpose was a quote from Summer '24 about the transfer strategy under Staveley and Ghodoussi. 

 

Where are the quotes about him and our shortlist? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm happy to see what he does with a fresh look to the squad with Ross Wilson alongside him this summer, but no problem whatsoever if the board don't feel that way. 

 

I think if he is going to go it'll be in this break though. Pointless keeping him until the summer if we don't see him as the person to oversee the next stage. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Howe may be a young manager but I’ve seen no real willingness from him to try to adapt and improve. He plays the same shite 433 with wingers up top every week, and brings on Willock and Murphy every time. 
 

I am not sure where this young dynamic coach narrative is coming from?

 

 

Edited by Jesse Pinkman

Link to post
Share on other sites

The people I find most frustrating are the ones saying “give him another season.” The reality is, we likely won’t even be in Europe next season so the same issues probably won’t come up anyway. But we can’t afford to keep bouncing in and out of European competitions like this. It’s not sustainable financially or competitively.

 

Howe has clearly struggled when it comes to balancing UCL football, and that’s something we can’t ignore. So what’s the plan? Keep him for another season, then sack him whether he gets UCL or not?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...