Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Beaten at his near post again after doing fuck all positive today.  Why is this fucker held to a different standard?  He's awful.

 

 

Edited by Teasy

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Teasy said:

Beaten at his near post again after doing fuck all positive today.  Why is this fucker held to a different standard?  He's awful.

 

 

 

Wasn't beat at his near post though 

 

But we absolutely do need a new keeper 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Teasy said:

Beaten at his near post again after doing fuck all positive today.  Why is this fucker held to a different standard?  He's awful.

 

 

 

he was shite but he wasnt beaten at his near post at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Teasy said:

Beaten at his near post again after doing fuck all positive today.  Why is this fucker held to a different standard?  He's awful.

 

 

 


By all means criticise him when he is crap. Which he has been a lot of times this season. But you might want to get your eyes tested :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Teasy said:

Beaten at his near post again after doing fuck all positive today.  Why is this fucker held to a different standard?  He's awful.

 

 

 

He was good today one big error early doors thats it. 

Give him a break man. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Third game back, kept arsenal to a single goal then we've picked up points (4 out of last 6 points) in last two games, stopped the losing streak with us conceding three goals in three games. Clean sheets would be amazing but that would be acceptable as a squad choice with one other next season for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gawalls said:

Third game back, kept arsenal to a single goal then we've picked up points (4 out of last 6 points) in last two games, stopped the losing streak with us conceding three goals in three games. Clean sheets would be amazing but that would be acceptable as a squad choice with one other next season for me.

Another player we are just going to let leave on a free then?

 

Our strategy of buying English players and letting the contracts run down isn't the best :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Another player we are just going to let leave on a free then?

 

Our strategy of buying English players and letting the contracts run down isn't the best :lol: 

Doesn't he just costs us around £10m FFS, hardly throwing money around is it. We need two keepers and can't buy both this window - get one and keep him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gawalls said:

Doesn't he just costs us around £10m FFS, hardly throwing money around is it. We need two keepers and can't buy both this window - get one and keep him.

I was being part flippant part serious . 

 

Ultimately, if we can sell him this summer and get some money back for him it's what we should be doing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

I was being part flippant part serious . 

 

Ultimately, if we can sell him this summer and get some money back for him it's what we should be doing. 

think your right even in jest low value in terms of their purchase price or time served at the club still have a cumulative cost.

 

Trips 12m?

BDB 12m?

Lacelles 5m?

Targett 15m?

Schar 3.5m?

Pope 10m?

Krafth 4m?

 

 

All low fees or been around so long that their cost loss probably means little to the accounts  and have all contributed but all likely come the end of their time to go for nowt. 

 

We all know we need to be better sellers low value players are harder as they will cost more to replace than their worth but the impact is still real. 

 

Issue around pope I am sick of him as no1 too many mistakes but we already have much to do if he's willing to be a no2 it may be better than spreading the budget this summer to finding 2 keepers. 

 

 

Edited by nufcjmc

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nufcjmc said:

think your right even in jest low value in terms of their purchase price or time served at the club still have a cumulative cost.

 

Trips 12m?

BDB 12m?

Lacelles 5m?

Targett 15m?

Schar 3.5m?

Pope 10m?

Krafth 4m?

 

 

All low fees or been around so long that their cost to mean little to the accounts  and have all contributed but all likely come the end of their time to go for nowt. 

 

We all know we need to be better sellers low value players are harder as they will cost more to replace than their worth but the impact is still real. 

 

Issue around pope I am sick of him as no1 too many mistakes but we already have much to do if he's willing to be a no2 it may be better than spreading the budget this summer to finding 2 keepers. 

Every one of those are players at the back, that's a big statement plan - take pope off the list and I agree but isn't burn like 34 or 35 now? Not getting that for him surely

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

Every one of those are players at the back, that's a big statement plan - take pope off the list and I agree but isn't burn like 34 or 35 now? Not getting that for him surely

Yeah we aren't, the biggest issue is we aren't going to get money and haven't for too many players whilst we have to pay transfer fees to replace them when they walk away for nothing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gawalls said:

Every one of those are players at the back, that's a big statement plan - take pope off the list and I agree but isn't burn like 34 or 35 now? Not getting that for him surely

 

I dont think we can/will get much for any of them and they werent purchased to turn a profit on (I assume). 

 

Older players for their experience/squad filler players who wont kick up a media or team fuss not getting as much starting time/ players you can call upon when needed and in theory get a "steady away performance". 

 

I see the logic is all of that the issue with letting players go for nothing is that they cant financially contribute to the churn in the squad and their replacement. We also dont appear to have anyone from the youth prospects to step up while they are in their twilight years (Alex Murphy is 22 in the summer and clearly not fancied at all). 

 

its more me thinking out loud to the question of well they didnt cost alot and are worth letting go from a fan prospective you cant argue most on that list have been worth the relative low fees but from a business standpoint its not a sustainable model to let a chunk of "assets" go for nothing having to fund their replacement 100%. 

 

I dont have any answer to this issue by the way it would be more palatable if we have some young academy prospect to take their place making it almost cost neutral but we dont (yet).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...