The College Dropout Posted yesterday at 15:08 Share Posted yesterday at 15:08 2 minutes ago, madras said: They might well do that now theyve seen others do it. Have many others sold assets to themselves the way Chelsea did ? Just Villa by the looks of it. Rumours Everton might. I hope PIF/RB do - it will confirm that they are slow and not particularly creative, but better late than never. 1 minute ago, madras said: They are the galling ones, the ones that many people have raised and Im still to hear a convincing reason as to why not. Aye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GallowgatePigeon Posted yesterday at 15:12 Share Posted yesterday at 15:12 17 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said: The Gallowgate Pigeon U wot m8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbydazzla Posted yesterday at 15:15 Share Posted yesterday at 15:15 2 minutes ago, GallowgatePigeon said: U wot m8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagMal Posted yesterday at 15:40 Share Posted yesterday at 15:40 1 hour ago, Interpolic said: Fuckin el I've caused some right ructions. Mate, water off a ducks back to me, I just thought I had missed out on some in joke or famous meme or something 🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Edgar Posted yesterday at 15:55 Share Posted yesterday at 15:55 Build the new stadium and sell it to ourselves for billions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted yesterday at 16:16 Share Posted yesterday at 16:16 1 hour ago, madras said: What assets have we to sell to ourselves ? 2D branded chess boards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted yesterday at 17:35 Share Posted yesterday at 17:35 Chess would be better if the boards were black and white stripes instead of chequered. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abacus Posted yesterday at 17:51 Share Posted yesterday at 17:51 Surely it's now 4-D chess if time is introduced into the equation? But we probably should have been planning for 5-D chess, Mitchell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted yesterday at 18:08 Share Posted yesterday at 18:08 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boey_Jarton Posted yesterday at 18:22 Share Posted yesterday at 18:22 3 hours ago, The College Dropout said: Are you suggesting what’s stopping us is that we don’t have any assets to sell? Thats the only thing stopping us? Mike Ashley's reign over the club contributed to chronic neglect across every aspect of the club including infrastructure and the women's team and so our opportunity for creative accounting is restricted in comparison to our competitors. I also suspect that Newcastle have made a conscious strategic decision to stay as squeaky clean as possible until the outcome and repurcussions of the Man City case are clear. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tarie4 Posted yesterday at 18:40 Share Posted yesterday at 18:40 15 minutes ago, Boey_Jarton said: Mike Ashley's reign over the club contributed to chronic neglect across every aspect of the club including infrastructure and the women's team and so our opportunity for creative accounting is restricted in comparison to our competitors. I also suspect that Newcastle have made a conscious strategic decision to stay as squeaky clean as possible until the outcome and repurcussions of the Man City case are clear. I agree, be patient and let the system collapse on itself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted yesterday at 18:49 Share Posted yesterday at 18:49 We’ve not been squeaky clean but that’s fine. It’s not the rules. Or assets. It’s a choice to not use loopholes multiple others have utilised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boey_Jarton Posted yesterday at 19:06 Share Posted yesterday at 19:06 (edited) 12 hours ago, The College Dropout said: We’ve not been squeaky clean but that’s fine. It’s not the rules. Or assets. It’s a choice to not use loopholes multiple others have utilised. We have operated on a comparatively clean basis, given the potential opportunities afforded by PIF ownership. Of course it is a choice to not use the loophole of selling the women's team (for example) right now, but that is at least partly due to the fact it would be commercial suicide to try to cash that chip in at this point in time, given the immaturity of our women's team compared to our peers, because like nearly every other aspect of the club, it was neglected for 14 years. Edited 15 hours ago by Boey_Jarton Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted yesterday at 20:34 Share Posted yesterday at 20:34 1 hour ago, The College Dropout said: We’ve not been squeaky clean but that’s fine. It’s not the rules. Or assets. It’s a choice to not use loopholes multiple others have utilised. You've not mentioned it before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newcastle Fan Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Not really too bothered about him for that price but we really need to get our act together and get some players in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Fair well sweet prince… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago He'll feel he's made it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago He looks an even bigger prick in a Chelsea shirt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roids Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 4 minutes ago, KennyUtd said: He looks an even bigger prick in a Chelsea shirt. No need to be salty Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Oh dear, what a shame, never mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 4 minutes ago, KennyUtd said: He looks an even bigger prick in a Chelsea shirt. Always thought he suited their shirt. Which told me all I needed to know 😂 Mbeumo on the other hand! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago 1 minute ago, Roids said: No need to be salty Every need... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coffee_Johnny Posted 15 hours ago Share Posted 15 hours ago Just now, PauloGeordio said: Always thought he suited their shirt. Which told me all I needed to know 😂 Mbeumo on the other hand! We wouldn’t want that beard fucking up our beautiful array of lovely boys. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 9 minutes ago, Coffee_Johnny said: We wouldn’t want that beard fucking up our beautiful array of lovely boys. We’ll never know but I’m sure it wouldn’t have been long before he had a clean shave and a blonde top Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago How have Chelsea still not got a shirt sponsor!? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now