janpawel Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 I think Liverpool could afford them if they wanted. But they're probably gonna find the next Salah and Van Dijk instead for a fraction of the price, such is their brilliant recruitment Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 I'm actually beginning to suspect some of you people of supporting Liverpool football club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 It’s not just the £150m, you’ve got £20-£30m signing on fee/agents and then £300k a week if he goes for that amount. nobody is spending that this summer, probably even next. Then Barcelona, Madrid and City might be looking. but we’ll be multi-premier league winners by then so they can fuck off. can definitely see a big new sponsor/shirt reveal/ Isak 9 promotion in the summer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Guy's a mental giant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave s Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 even if we eventually sold him for a world record fee I’d still be upset. i fucking love him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Cannot see fsg howking 150 million out mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 minute ago, andycap said: Cannot see fsg howking 150 million out mind. This is what I don't get Liverpool fans complain every window about their lack of signings. The last two windows they've only signed Chiesa for £10 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 7 minutes ago, andycap said: Cannot see fsg howking 150 million out mind. If they can't, who can? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 hour ago, janpawel said: I think Liverpool could afford them if they wanted. But they're probably gonna find the next Salah and Van Dijk instead for a fraction of the price, such is their brilliant recruitment Van Dijk was a world record transfer fee for a defender when they signed him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 19 minutes ago, ohmelads said: Van Dijk was a world record transfer fee for a defender when they signed him. Thats the other thing with Liverpool.. Salah, Trent, Van Dijk all potentially leaving on a free. They'll need to spend some wedge to replace them (even if not directly but in the squad), so £150m on one player is unlikely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheikBoom Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 The full clip isn't that bad. He's very complimentary but the presenter is constantly trying to engineer an Arsenal + Isak comment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Just so fed up to the back teeth of the total disrespect and attempted engineering from some quarters around the insistence that Isak should be or will be going to Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 21 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: Thats the other thing with Liverpool.. Salah, Trent, Van Dijk all potentially leaving on a free. They'll need to spend some wedge to replace them (even if not directly but in the squad), so £150m on one player is unlikely They are on course to win at least one trophy this season and will definitely be in the CL next season. So if they don't have the funds to replace them, it does call into question the fees being paid at present anyway. I suppose you could argue that Liverpool have the PSR headroom to spend whatever it takes, but just don't want to. Then that calls their ownership into question regardless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Just now, TRon said: They are on course to win at least one trophy this season and will definitely be in the CL next season. So if they don't have the funds to replace them, it does call into question the fees being paid at present anyway. I suppose you could argue that Liverpool have the PSR headroom to spend whatever it takes, but just don't want to. Then that calls their ownership into question regardless. It's not that they cant afford to replace them, but they have managed to get a situation where 3 of their top players might leave on a free at the same time and non of the replacements will come cheaply. They've already spent a decent wedge on Marmalade as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 minute ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: It's not that they cant afford to replace them, but they have managed to get a situation where 3 of their top players might leave on a free at the same time and non of the replacements will come cheaply. They've already spent a decent wedge on Marmalade as well The alternative would have been to sell those players before they got to their final year. That begs the question would they have had the same success with replacements? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 So good Arsenal fans have put together a compilation of him bodying VVD because he’s been so dominant against Arsenal they want to show it’s par for the course for the lad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Heres a question. With Isak, Gyokeres, Kulusevski and Elanga, why are Sweden so shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Needs a better song Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 25 minutes ago, Belfast Boy said: Heres a question. With Isak, Gyokeres, Kulusevski and Elanga, why are Sweden so shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 City and chelsea are the only two who I think Could afford him. Real and psg on the continent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mush Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 No way he leaves us for fucking Arsenal now anyway. That's pretty much a lateral move. If he does leave it'll be to Man City/Liverpool/Real Madrid etc. He's already outgrown Arsenal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 If you sell him to one of the top premier league teams, you're setting that team up to dominate the league for the next 5 years. No amount of money is worth that. If and when we have to sell him, it has to be to a club on the continent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 19 minutes ago, Andy said: If you sell him to one of the top premier league teams, you're setting that team up to dominate the league for the next 5 years. No amount of money is worth that. If and when we have to sell him, it has to be to a club on the continent. I've said this previously. As a matter of principle, especially with the so called top 6 conspiring to make things difficult for Newcastle, he should under no circumstances be sold to any of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberry Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 (edited) We have to give a raise to Isak. This make me disappointed more than lack of new signing. Make him the best paid player. Edited February 6 by Strawberry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keggy_Keagal Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 This is what Spurs had to put up with for years with Kane. The media were selling him for about 5 years before he left Tottenham. I can't see it this summer for Isak unless it's a superclub or possibly Liverpool as a panacea to the fanbase should they lose Salah and Trent. That being said I don't where they stand from a PSR point of view as both of those would on free transfers so not much incoming unless I'm mistaken. Summer 26 depending where we are I'd say is far more likely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now