Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Checko]

2 minutes ago, nufcjmc said:

I get the mitigation and lack of competition for his signature but liverpool have already spent more on a player this window in wirtz 

 

Isak has 3 years left is coming into "peaked age" has proved it in one of the best leagues in the prem and strikers are hard to come by and usually the most expensive position to recruit. 

 

I get brinkmanship or chancing your arm if I was a liverpool fan I would want my club to try and do good business at a good price but its around rice/ Moises Caicedo'se money its laughable if they thought it was a serious offer. 

I'd say 110 million is not an offer that will be accepted, but  not laughable. Their first offer is the fourth highest transfer fee ever. That's the starting point for negotiations. Wirtz was apparently 100 milion quid plus up to 16 million in addons. Isak was reportedly £110million plus addons.

 

It's all a game. They want to unsettle the player to try and get the price down, as they should.  It's a shame Isak's playing along so easily. That's my main gripe really. I don't have a problem with the way Liverpool are doing things. Doesn't seem much different from us and Guehi last summer.

[Zero]

I would like to point out that all these

”Newcastle will only do business after getting a replacement first”

”Newcastle wants 150m”

”after getting a ST in Newcastle is willing to sell at 150m”

 

are kinda bullshits spread out by Liverpool / those journalist. We didn’t mention any of the above. Yasir can still tell Liverpool to fuck off after signing Sesko or Wissa, or tell them Isak won’t go at any price.

 

Don’t be brainwashed by the media. We didn’t say 150m would do it.

[Zero]

1 minute ago, Checko said:

I'd say 110 million is not an offer that will be accepted, but  not laughable. Their first offer is the fourth highest transfer fee ever. That's the starting point for negotiations. Wirtz was apparently 100 milion quid plus up to 16 million in addons. Isak was reportedly £110million plus addons.

 

It's all a game. They want to unsettle the player to try and get the price down, as they should.  It's a shame Isak's playing along so easily. That's my main gripe really. I don't have a problem with the way Liverpool are doing things. Doesn't seem much different from us and Guehi last summer.

110m no add ons

[Izakaya]

£110m is laughable. Glad to see us display some semblance of testicular fortitude. 

[Palestoon]

Interested to see if we become more willing to negotiate if Sesko comes in. Would the 150 mil evaluation come down to 130?

 

Would love to see us hold him to another year regardless 

[Pandamninator]

2 hours ago, oldtype said:

 

We can't meet the asking price on a player: stupid lowballing club with absentee owners. We're doomed forever.

 

Liverpool can't meet the asking price on a player: MASTER PLAN. We're doomed forever.

 

 

 

Mike Ashley turned this forum into a bunch of Reek's from Game of Thrones.

 

No wonder Liverpool thought they could just pinch him for 60 cents on the dollar.  

 

 

[gdm]

Just now, Palestoon said:

Interested to see if we become more willing to negotiate if Sesko comes in. Would the 150 mil evaluation come down to 130?

 

Would love to see us hold him to another year regardless 

Really if you think about it if we can afford it there’s no reason to sell Isak, coz even if he throws his toys out the pram we’d have Sesko to start games 

[Wolfcastle]

2 minutes ago, Palestoon said:

Interested to see if we become more willing to negotiate if Sesko comes in. Would the 150 mil evaluation come down to 130?

 

Would love to see us hold him to another year regardless 

It shouldn't. A player is worth what he's worth. This time next year with a years worth of contract having ticked over £120-£130m might do it but now his value is at least £150m.  

[Vinny Green Balls]

Worth is not only in cash. If we’ve been fucked with, it is worth it to hold out for me. 
 

Once again, these pricks took our top target. Whether we get Sesko or not, they need to pay an absurd amount or absolutely go fuck themselves.

[Vinny Green Balls]

I’d happily take less money later if it meant standing up to the cartel now, and letting them know that we are not a farm club for them. These fuckers should be worried about us. 

 

 

Edited August 1, 2025 by Vinny Green Balls

[Palestoon]

The story was, we were looking for someone to play alongside Isak... Would love it if we brought in Sesko, got Liverpool excited and then told them to fuck off again.

 

 

Edited August 1, 2025 by Palestoon

[gdm]

Just now, Vinny Green Balls said:

I’d happily take less money later if it meant standing up to the cartel now, and let them know that we are not a farm club for them. These fuckers should be worried about us. 

Sigh Sesko, then string Liverpool along till the end of the window then tell them to fuck off 

[Vinny Green Balls]

That would bring me nothing but joy.

[Adrian1881]

Liverpool fans think we will sell them Isak since rumor is we can get Sesko now? I still hope that Isak stays and wins the fans over. I think PIF should do better job after this clusterf...

[Jesse Pinkman]

Watched the Everton assist and now sad again. 

[duo]

I feel they had no intension of paying what we want - hence all the unsettling of Isak and media leaks to try and drive down the price.  They still need money for a CB don't forget. 

[mondonewc]

55 minutes ago, Checko said:

I'd say 110 million is not an offer that will be accepted, but  not laughable. Their first offer is the fourth highest transfer fee ever. That's the starting point for negotiations. Wirtz was apparently 100 milion quid plus up to 16 million in addons. Isak was reportedly £110million plus addons.

 

It's all a game. They want to unsettle the player to try and get the price down, as they should.  It's a shame Isak's playing along so easily. That's my main gripe really. I don't have a problem with the way Liverpool are doing things. Doesn't seem much different from us and Guehi last summer.

It doesn't make sense to talk about transfer fee records as if they have any actual relevance.  

 

The transfer market is so inflated, especially last 1-2 years, Chelsea have paid 100m+ for multiple DM's since we got taking over. 

 

Isak is basically a one of a kind, and whilst I do feel it's best he goes now, we can't allow ourselves to be rinsed because of his behaviour. So, for that reason, I wouldn't sell to Liverpool for 150m, tell them to gtf and we deal with the situation or they pay what he's really worth.

[Gawalls]

35 minutes ago, Adrian1881 said:

Liverpool fans think we will sell them Isak since rumor is we can get Sesko now? I still hope that Isak stays and wins the fans over. I think PIF should do better job after this clusterf...

I don’t think he gives a flying fuck if he wins the fans over. He’s checked out man.

[Jaqen]

1 hour ago, Checko said:

I'd say 110 million is not an offer that will be accepted, but  not laughable. Their first offer is the fourth highest transfer fee ever. That's the starting point for negotiations. Wirtz was apparently 100 milion quid plus up to 16 million in addons. Isak was reportedly £110million plus addons.

 

It's all a game. They want to unsettle the player to try and get the price down, as they should.  It's a shame Isak's playing along so easily. That's my main gripe really. I don't have a problem with the way Liverpool are doing things. Doesn't seem much different from us and Guehi last summer.

 

It's laughable because it's lower than their first non verbal offer of 120m that was also going to be rejected  

 

 

[Pandamninator]

16 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

I don’t think he gives a flying fuck if he wins the fans over. He’s checked out man.

Players have constantly proven they can very easily check back in when a move fails and they start risk fines if they don't behave.

 

You sound like a Scouser on Reddit who act the like Coutinho and Suarez sagas never happened.

 

 

Edited August 2, 2025 by Pandamninator

[Adrian1881]

2 minutes ago, Gawalls said:

I don’t think he gives a flying fuck if he wins the fans over. He’s checked out man.

Maybe yes maybe no... Maybe it's about  time for PIF to figure it out how to move project faster and more efficiently so vultures like LFC can fu...off !!!

[r0cafella]

They are absolutely deranged

[Pandamninator]

I know there's no chance of us actually going down this road... but... imagine 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/07/liverpool-virgil-van-dijk-southampton-drop-interest

 

Quote

Southampton are confident that Virgil van Dijk will remain at the club next season after Liverpool were forced into a humiliating climbdown over their pursuit of the player. The south-coast club were furious to read stories on Monday that Liverpool were primed to complete a £60m move for the Holland centre-half and they reported them to the Premier League for an alleged illegal approach.

 

Southampton felt that Liverpool’s fingerprints were on the stories and they questioned how there could have been the belief at Anfield that Van Dijk wanted to join them given they had made no official approach for him. Moreover, they wondered how – as per the reports – Van Dijk might be so keen to play for Jürgen Klopp if he had not spoken to the Liverpool manager.

 

[ChrisMcQuillan]

12 minutes ago, Pandamninator said:

I know there's no chance of us actually going down this road... but... imagine 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/07/liverpool-virgil-van-dijk-southampton-drop-interest

 

 

They’ve been doing this for years. 

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, ChrisMcQuillan said:

They’ve been doing this for years. 

It works and goes unpunished they won't be changing.