Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, BrickTop said:

In spite of all this nonsense, imagine if Eddie's Mags go and bulldoze their way to a win against Liverpool in a couple of weeks [emoji38] 

 

Barnes x2 with Osula celebrating like he scored them

Monday night or not, SJP will surely be a bearpit for that game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Zero said:

My bottom line is not to Liverpool this summer. If the club is able to find other suitors I can accept to let him go for the sake of squad harmony.

 

In fact I wonder why other clubs won’t do something like a loan + obligation deal like the Hall one so they can get Isak now and paid next season. We are fine with this.

My perfect scenario would be PSG and though Isak has thrown his toys out saying only Liverpool, surely PSG has some draw? Current champions, fantastic team, money fits. 

 

For us it could work too, they have players we could use + money. Ramos, Kolo Muani, Lee Kang-In, Asencio (at a stretch). We were interested in Ramos prior to signing Isak, since his Benfica days too. 

 

 

Edited by Casey

Link to post
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, KennyUtd said:

If he's definitely going,as some have said, then why hasn't he already gone. If the writing's on the wall surely we'd get the deal done and use the funds elsewhere. It would be madness to wait until the last few days of the window to sell him. Starting to feel he stays. Not sure I want him to like.

Because it makes our negotiation position harder if teams already know we have a sudden cash influx of £130m+.

And also know just how desperate we are of replacing him. Right now they can think that if we don't get any ok deals we are just going to keep him.

 

 

Edited by Displayname

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Casey said:

My perfect scenario would be PSG and though Isak has thrown his toys out saying only Liverpool, surely PSG has some draw? Current champions, fantastic team, money fits. 

 

For us it could work too, they have players we could use + money. Ramos, Kolo Muani, Lee Kang-In, Asencio (at a stretch). We were interested in Ramos prior to signing Isak, since his Benfica days too. 

 

 

 

Another day another player + money fantasy transfer 😂

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, WinstonFC said:

Another day another player + money fantasy transfer 😂

Aye but gotta do something to stave off the abject misery and boredom from the proper state of this shite window. [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Because it makes our negotiation position harder if teams already know we have a sudden cash influx of £130m+.

And also know just how desperate we are of replacing him. Right now they can think that if we don't get any ok deals we are just going to keep him.

 

 

 

What? Harder than they've already been. I know he'll be a big loss but this whole situation is crippling our transfer window and has killed all the highs from last season. Tell him/them it's £150 million by 5pm on Saturday or it's not happening. We desperately need to get everyone back on track for next week. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KennyUtd said:

What? Harder than they've already been. I know he'll be a big loss but this whole situation is crippling our transfer window and has killed all the highs from last season. Tell him/them it's £150 million by 5pm on Saturday or it's not happening. We desperately need to get everyone back on track for next week. 

Ofcourse its going to be harder to negotiate with other teams. That has not been our problem so far, attracting the actual players has.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Ofcourse its going to be harder to negotiate with other teams. That has not been our problem so far, attracting the actual players has.

I'm not buying that like. You never hear that with other clubs when they sell big. They just get on with it and source a replacement. Clubs already know we have money before the Isak sale. We need to target players who really want the move. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Casey said:

My perfect scenario would be PSG and though Isak has thrown his toys out saying only Liverpool, surely PSG has some draw? Current champions, fantastic team, money fits. 

 

For us it could work too, they have players we could use + money. Ramos, Kolo Muani, Lee Kang-In, Asencio (at a stretch). We were interested in Ramos prior to signing Isak, since his Benfica days too. 

 

 

 

I’d take those three Ramos Muani and Kangin straight swap for Isak now. Would sort out a lot of issues at once. If they wanted to throw in Donnarumma or a CB (Skriniar?) they’re not using even better. We can give them the Sesko money.
 

Do a man’s shop on Xmas eve just buy everything last minute from one store. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, duo said:

PIF should throw money at her to return if they had any sense.

I think theyve frequently demonstrated that they dont as far as were concerned....actively funding our rivals by over paying for their cast offs, so they can strenghten even more? Yes we may just be an 'investment'...but if i understand business correctly, you dont buy a company then spend good money helping the competition get better. 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BrickTop said:

In spite of all this nonsense, imagine if Eddie's Mags go and bulldoze their way to a win against Liverpool in a couple of weeks [emoji38] 

 

Barnes x2 with Osula celebrating like he scored them

 

Made me chuckle that like [emoji38] He does tho, doesn't he? Never mind Xg, needs to be a stat on  "goals scored by someone else". Call it Nv 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

Not apples for apples, but Levy dealt with Kane’s little tantrum. If Isak is willing to reason knowing that the club won’t back down, then it’s not unsalvageable. Tell him that he can go next summer, and if he’s got a problem with that, then tough shit.

 

Allowing the cartel clubs to win with this bullying not only sends a message to them that they can tap up our players, but it sends a message to other players that they can throw a tantrum and force us to sell no matter where they are in their contract. That’s a really bad look, and dwarfs any headache caused by a 2 meter tall toddler.

 

 

This. If we sell to Liverpool I would fear Tonali would be the next to wonder what sort of project he's bought into. With the right signings this summer we could have been genuine title contenders. Instead we are going the other way and all of our rivals are stealing a march. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TRon said:

 

 

This. If we sell to Liverpool I would fear Tonali would be the next to wonder what sort of project he's bought into. With the right signings this summer we could have been genuine title contenders. Instead we are going the other way and all of our rivals are stealing a march. 

My Leeds supporting mate just messaged me saying Man U after Tonali. I'm sure every other PL club are, too. That's why we should make a stand on Isak and not sell this summer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Pablo123 said:

My Leeds supporting mate just messaged me saying Man U after Tonali. I'm sure every other PL club are, too. That's why we should make a stand on Isak and not sell this summer. 

City to replace Kovacic next season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was listening to the Overlap thing this morning and when the Newcastle supporter suggested the fair fee for Isak being around £150m, many on the show seemed entirely bowled over in astonishment at it. It's not the first time I've read or seen that reaction either. For me it feels very cut and dry, if Wirtz is £116m, then one of the world's best strikers, proven in the Premier League, with a unique skillset and at the perfect age is surely worth £30m+ more? Are we missing something here or is it just an example of the condescending attitude of the cartel club supporters towards all things Newcastle United?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Condescending attitude.  The media think we should hand over our best talent at a value than benefits their beloved cartel six.

 

You don't see this attitude with Brighton, mind because they toe the line and aren't a real threat.  If they were I suspect they would be talked about in the same way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Infinitely Content said:

I was listening to the Overlap thing this morning and when the Newcastle supporter suggested the fair fee for Isak being around £150m, many on the show seemed entirely bowled over in astonishment at it. It's not the first time I've read or seen that reaction either. For me it feels very cut and dry, if Wirtz is £116m, then one of the world's best strikers, proven in the Premier League, with a unique skillset and at the perfect age is surely worth £30m+ more? Are we missing something here or is it just an example of the condescending attitude of the cartel club supporters towards all things Newcastle United?

It's a piss take isn't it.

 

Carragher saying £150m is Mbappe money. Tell your club to go and offer £150m to Real Madrid for Mbappe and see what they say, I'd suggest the response would be even more "emphatic" than our rejection of their Isak bid reportedly was, the fucking idiot 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sima said:

Condescending attitude.  The media think we should hand over our best talent at a value than benefits their beloved cartel six.

 

You don't see this attitude with Brighton, mind because they toe the line and aren't a real threat.  If they were I suspect they would be talked about in the same way.

They perpetuate a "right order of things", where the cream of English football rightfully sign the best players, then lead the country to glory on the continent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

What is the point of this if you don’t say where you heard it from?

 

source close to the club? Staff? Player? Streetwalker in the area?

 

 

 

Someone with links to a former Leicester player who probably has a fairly good idea fwiw ;)  

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kilcline said:

It's a piss take isn't it.

 

Carragher saying £150m is Mbappe money. Tell your club to go and offer £150m to Real Madrid for Mbappe and see what they say, I'd suggest the response would be even more "emphatic" than our rejection of their Isak bid reportedly was, the fucking idiot 


It is a bit aye, I find it more frustrating than I should to be honest. It feels like a concerted effort to look down on Newcastle United in a sniggering, scornful way. I veer from finding it frustrating to somewhat pathetic that they feel the need to deride us, looking down upon on from their already lofty positions.

The facts feel obvious to me, you cast a glance over other recent and even not so recent transfers, and it becomes evidently clear that asking for £150m for Isak is quite sensible and reasonable comparatively.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...