Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[The Bonk]

10 minutes ago, Smal said:

He’ll be off to Liverpool, like . If you haven’t prepared yourself for it then start now.

 

Yasir doesn't strike me as someone who gives in to smug cunts like Isak or appreciates being strong armed in any way. Depending how arrogant Isak came off in that conversation, I can see Yasir say "anyone but Liverpool" and "I don't care when it happens, but not them." 

[Emotic]

I certainly hope our signing of Woltemade and apparent move for Fermin means there's a deal for Isak to Munich or Barcelona. Would make sense in the context.

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, The Bonk said:

 

Yasir doesn't strike me as someone who gives in to smug cunts like Isak or appreciates being strong armed in any way. Depending how arrogant Isak came off in that conversation, I can see Yasir say "anyone but Liverpool" and "I don't care when it happens, but not them." 

I think this too. I also think Yar absolutely loves Eddie so much so he was willing to put Mitchell in the bin for him.

 

I also reckon Eddie can't wait to get rid of this cunt and is less bothered about his destination. 

 

I just hope Eddie knows how good he is (ratness aside) and insist he isn't sold to another English club. 

[The Bonk]

2 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

I think this too. I also think Yar absolutely loves Eddie so much so he was willing to put Mitchell in the bin for him.

 

I also reckon Eddie can't wait to get rid of this cunt and is less bothered about his destination. 

 

I just hope Eddie knows how good he is (ratness aside) and insist he isn't sold to another English club. 

 

We aren't having these conversations if Eddie didn't pluck the cunt from Sociedad and help mould his natural ability into the player Isak is today. If he does go to Liverpool, I hope he flops worse than Carroll did there and I have a soft spot for Wor Andy.  

[The Bonk]

Double post for some reason. 

 

 

Edited August 29, 2025 by The Bonk

[gazza ladra]

1 hour ago, Zero said:

I just have a second thought: how about we tell Chelsea they could have Isak for 80m + Jackson

Thought Chelsea were supposed to be getting away from the kind of crazy salaries that Isak is looking for.

 

I just had thought. They've locked in a lot if talent on long term contracts with lower salaries. How long before they get bitten by one of their own little Isaks.

[Toon1984]

I’d be surprised if Eddie wants Jackson. Seems to have the wrong temperament and we all know how much importance Howe puts on that.

[timeEd32]

7 hours ago, JT24 said:

Isak to Bayern for £150m, please.

 

I'd do it for £110m to be honest.

[timeEd32]

Unless the Woltemade purchase puts us in a questionable spot for UEFA's calendar year financial rules then we truly hold all the cards now, and I really hope we make that very clear to both Liverpool and Isak.

[Emotic]

Giving in to Isak and Liverpool now will also risk Woltemade twerking for Munich next season if he does well here. 

[LaurentRobert]

As things stand, I don't think we'll go for Strand Larsen anymore. 

 

So it all comes down to Yoanne Wissa essentially. If he comes we'll sell Isak. If he doesn't, then we'll keep Isak and reassess in January. 

 

That's what it'll come down to in the last 3 days, unless the club surprises us with another leftfield option, like they have with Woltemade. 

 

Sorry socusers, but it would be utter madness to go into the season with Woltemade as our only striker when we'll be playing 50+ games. He's not even a typical number 9 anyway. 

[Pandamninator]

1 hour ago, Smal said:

He’ll be off to Liverpool, like . If you haven’t prepared yourself for it then start now.

Unless there is a Wissa change of heart by Brentford, no chance.

 

We'd still be one clumsy defenders leg away from Gordon at striker again.  Plus Howe likes to take his time to bed the forrins in properly.

 

 

Edited August 29, 2025 by Pandamninator

[Skeletor]

2 minutes ago, LaurentRobert said:

As things stand, I don't think we'll go for Strand Larsen anymore. 

 

So it all comes down to Yoanne Wissa essentially. If he comes we'll sell Isak. If he doesn't, then we'll keep Isak and reassess in January. 

 

That's what it'll come down to in the last 3 days, unless the club surprises us with another leftfield option, like they have with Woltemade. 

 

Sorry socusers, but it would be utter madness to go into the season with Woltemade as our only striker when we'll be playing 50+ games. He's not even a typical number 9 anyway. 

 

[bobloblaw]

3 hours ago, Kid Icarus said:

Would love to recreate the film Celtic Pride on him if I knew there'd be zero consequences like.

 

As a kid who wore out that vhs I love that reference.

[Izakaya]

I’ve been saying this for weeks — there’s a much bigger picture playing out in the background here, and the Isak situation has exposed it perfectly.

This isn’t just Liverpool vs Newcastle. It’s FSG vs PIF, and it stretches far beyond football.

Here’s what’s really going on:

FSG (Liverpool’s owners) are backed by RedBird Capital, who have huge investments in global media, streaming, and broadcasting rights.

PIF (Newcastle’s owners) are now making big moves into the media world too, working with DAZN and looking to rival the legacy broadcasters by securing TV rights — including Premier League broadcasting in the future.

If PIF breaks into this space, it’s a direct threat to FSG and RedBird’s wider business model, which relies on control over media, distribution, and partnerships.

Now add the Premier League Board into the mix:
Several members — like Mai Fyfield (ex-Sky, now BBC/Roku) and Dharmash Mistry (venture capital and digital media) — have deep interests in finance and media ecosystems that are closely aligned with the legacy broadcasters FSG works with.

So when we see PSR rules being pushed hard and Liverpool publicly saying they won’t make another bid for Isak unless Newcastle are willing to sell, it tells you this isn’t about needing a striker. It’s about power and control over football’s next phase — broadcast rights, investment influence, and future commercial dominance.

This is a fight for who controls the money, the exposure, and the direction of the Premier League. Isak is just one piece on the chessboard.

 

 

 

Taken from an FB post. 

[Kanj]

3 minutes ago, Izakaya said:

I’ve been saying this for weeks — there’s a much bigger picture playing out in the background here, and the Isak situation has exposed it perfectly.

This isn’t just Liverpool vs Newcastle. It’s FSG vs PIF, and it stretches far beyond football.

Here’s what’s really going on:

FSG (Liverpool’s owners) are backed by RedBird Capital, who have huge investments in global media, streaming, and broadcasting rights.

PIF (Newcastle’s owners) are now making big moves into the media world too, working with DAZN and looking to rival the legacy broadcasters by securing TV rights — including Premier League broadcasting in the future.

If PIF breaks into this space, it’s a direct threat to FSG and RedBird’s wider business model, which relies on control over media, distribution, and partnerships.

Now add the Premier League Board into the mix:
Several members — like Mai Fyfield (ex-Sky, now BBC/Roku) and Dharmash Mistry (venture capital and digital media) — have deep interests in finance and media ecosystems that are closely aligned with the legacy broadcasters FSG works with.

So when we see PSR rules being pushed hard and Liverpool publicly saying they won’t make another bid for Isak unless Newcastle are willing to sell, it tells you this isn’t about needing a striker. It’s about power and control over football’s next phase — broadcast rights, investment influence, and future commercial dominance.

This is a fight for who controls the money, the exposure, and the direction of the Premier League. Isak is just one piece on the chessboard.

 

 

 

Taken from an FB post. 

look up interim Merlin on Twitter. 

[Izakaya]

2 minutes ago, Kanj said:

look up interim Merlin on Twitter. 

Don't have twitter to see the rest their posts, but this comment was taken from a post about them. 

[r0cafella]

10 minutes ago, Izakaya said:

I’ve been saying this for weeks — there’s a much bigger picture playing out in the background here, and the Isak situation has exposed it perfectly.

This isn’t just Liverpool vs Newcastle. It’s FSG vs PIF, and it stretches far beyond football.

Here’s what’s really going on:

FSG (Liverpool’s owners) are backed by RedBird Capital, who have huge investments in global media, streaming, and broadcasting rights.

PIF (Newcastle’s owners) are now making big moves into the media world too, working with DAZN and looking to rival the legacy broadcasters by securing TV rights — including Premier League broadcasting in the future.

If PIF breaks into this space, it’s a direct threat to FSG and RedBird’s wider business model, which relies on control over media, distribution, and partnerships.

Now add the Premier League Board into the mix:
Several members — like Mai Fyfield (ex-Sky, now BBC/Roku) and Dharmash Mistry (venture capital and digital media) — have deep interests in finance and media ecosystems that are closely aligned with the legacy broadcasters FSG works with.

So when we see PSR rules being pushed hard and Liverpool publicly saying they won’t make another bid for Isak unless Newcastle are willing to sell, it tells you this isn’t about needing a striker. It’s about power and control over football’s next phase — broadcast rights, investment influence, and future commercial dominance.

This is a fight for who controls the money, the exposure, and the direction of the Premier League. Isak is just one piece on the chessboard.

 

 

 

Taken from an FB post. 

 

Certified Alex Jones watcher. 

[Menace]

1 hour ago, Izakaya said:

I’ve been saying this for weeks — there’s a much bigger picture playing out in the background here, and the Isak situation has exposed it perfectly.

This isn’t just Liverpool vs Newcastle. It’s FSG vs PIF, and it stretches far beyond football.

Here’s what’s really going on:

FSG (Liverpool’s owners) are backed by RedBird Capital, who have huge investments in global media, streaming, and broadcasting rights.

PIF (Newcastle’s owners) are now making big moves into the media world too, working with DAZN and looking to rival the legacy broadcasters by securing TV rights — including Premier League broadcasting in the future.

If PIF breaks into this space, it’s a direct threat to FSG and RedBird’s wider business model, which relies on control over media, distribution, and partnerships.

Now add the Premier League Board into the mix:
Several members — like Mai Fyfield (ex-Sky, now BBC/Roku) and Dharmash Mistry (venture capital and digital media) — have deep interests in finance and media ecosystems that are closely aligned with the legacy broadcasters FSG works with.

So when we see PSR rules being pushed hard and Liverpool publicly saying they won’t make another bid for Isak unless Newcastle are willing to sell, it tells you this isn’t about needing a striker. It’s about power and control over football’s next phase — broadcast rights, investment influence, and future commercial dominance.

This is a fight for who controls the money, the exposure, and the direction of the Premier League. Isak is just one piece on the chessboard.

 

 

 

Taken from an FB post. 

 

Aye that's why they gave them money for Nunez and Fabinho.

[JUICE690]

Alexander Ballsak.

[ToonCanuck]

 150 not a penny less. thats what he's worth,dippers can pay up or F O .

[elbee909]

33 minutes ago, JUICE690 said:

Alexander Ballsak.

 

Alex Isaktually a dick

[elbee909]

8 hours ago, Mike said:

 

Would he fuck. Wouldn't snake a drain the workshy tools downing cocksucker. Doesn't have the bottle for real work. Red cunt.

 

Mike - you brought me up on making a joke at the expense of Jota, and yep, hands up, you were right to do that. Fair enough.

 

However 'cocksucker' is rooted in homophobia and there's no need for it.

[Pearljam10]

3 hours ago, Toon1984 said:

I’d be surprised if Eddie wants Jackson. Seems to have the wrong temperament and we all know how much importance Howe puts on that.

Agree, we have Gordon and his red cards. Dont need another. 

[Izakaya]

1 hour ago, Menace said:

 

Aye that's why they gave them money for Nunez and Fabinho.

Yeah that's a very fair point