Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Sibierski said:

Feels such a shitty waste of a slot having Chelsea in conference league. We would’ve absolutely loved it, they will just win it and shrug their shoulders.


Not paid any attention, is there anyone in there who might give them a game? Every matchup of theirs I’ve seen so far has been a bit of a joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Astroblack said:

Man U are still a mess. Love to see it. 

 

I was watching a bit of the game earlier.

 

They did not look convincing at all in that new system.

 

Don't think the players are good enough for the roles some of them are playing.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

I was watching a bit of the game earlier.

 

They did not look convincing at all in that new system.

 

Don't think the players are good enough for the roles some of them are playing.

 


They look exactly the same. Wingers instructed to stay touchline tight. So stubborn. Ineffective players.  

 

 

Edited by Astroblack

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Disco said:


Ah yes, thought he sounded loosely familiar.

 

They bought him from B/G and then shipped him back. Another piece of "evidence" for my theory about a manager implementing a tactical "system" where every player knows the exact "responsibility" and "expectation" for them when playing in a certain position being the best strategy a football manager can utilize. 

 

Pretty much every single player that's been sold from B/G have came crawling back with their tail between their legs after failing at a "bigger club" in a "better league". B/G players don't play anywhere near as well for the national side as they do for B/G as well, mainly due to the players not really being as good as the tactical system B/G utilizes makes them look like being :dontknow: 

 

First time I realized the above was when B/G thrashed Roma 6-1 after the press had been expecting, and building up to, the opposite happening - because B/G's four "best" players were all unavailable for the match. In the end, the four replacements (mainly youth team players) played just as well as the "best" players did in their positions and B/G's play and style didn't seem affected at all from "missing" their "best" players.

 

B/G implements the same tactics as the first team does when it comes to style of play and positional/role responsibilities and expectations across all levels, starting at the most junior level, all the way through their youth sides and reserves. Replace any first team player with an available B/G player playing the same position and the team as a whole remains pretty much unaffected. 

 

 

Edited by Kaizero

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...