tgarve Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, tgarve said: He wasn’t behind the ball??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 10 minutes ago, cubaricho said: Because it’s where the ball is, it has nothing to do with Emerson’s body? Yep, but it is where Kane's concerned, i just think that decision is finding a reason to disallow a goal, and i guess that the issue with the way VAR officials are implementing decisions. There's zero margin of error, there's always a fraction of second for a ball to move, at the same time a player is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 4 minutes ago, tgarve said: I see what you mean. I didn't see that dotted blue line at first. But have they measured the position of the ball in the air correctly in relation to the pitch? Normally with VAR, they only have to measure the attacker with the last defender. When I saw it live, he looked clearly behind the ball, but yeah, perhaps that's wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 5 minutes ago, tgarve said: I know, but i think you're not following my point. Most of Emerson is ahead of Kane, the only parts of Kane offside are his knee, head and left shoulder, and he scores with his right foot. I just think that's a margin call that should go with the attacking team. Basically Kane is measured by his farthest forward scoring body part, Emerson is measured by where the ball strikes him, that's kind skewed imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 1 minute ago, Cronky said: I see what you mean. I didn't see that dotted blue line at first. But have they measured the position of the ball in the air correctly in relation to the pitch? Normally with VAR, they only have to measure the attacker with the last defender. When I saw it live, he looked clearly behind the ball, but yeah, perhaps that's wrong. It’s fucking ridiculous nonetheless like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 1 minute ago, Bimpy474 said: I know, but i think you're not following my point. Most of Emerson is ahead of Kane, the only parts of Kane offside are his knee, head and left shoulder, and he scores with his right foot. I just think that's a margin call that should go with the attacking team. Basically Kane is measured by his farthest forward scoring body part, Emerson is measured by where the ball strikes him, that's kind skewed imo. Agree for a rule change but it’s right in the current rules Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, Bimpy474 said: I know, but i think you're not following my point. Most of Emerson is ahead of Kane You keep missing the point that this has nothing to do with the decision. The offside rule is where the ball is when passed and then the furthest forward part of the body that can be used to score a goal of the person receiving the ball. It has nothing to do with how much of the passer's body is behind or ahead of the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, Cronky said: I see what you mean. I didn't see that dotted blue line at first. But have they measured the position of the ball in the air correctly in relation to the pitch? Normally with VAR, they only have to measure the attacker with the last defender. When I saw it live, he looked clearly behind the ball, but yeah, perhaps that's wrong. I have to admit i think the decision technically is right, but imo it's wrong for the reasons i've explained. It's not a system being implemented for goals, it's a system being implemented to stop them, which i don't think was the way it was meant to be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, tgarve said: Agree for a rule change but it’s right in the current rules Aye it was. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 3 minutes ago, Bimpy474 said: I know, but i think you're not following my point. Most of Emerson is ahead of Kane, the only parts of Kane offside are his knee, head and left shoulder, and he scores with his right foot. I just think that's a margin call that should go with the attacking team. Basically Kane is measured by his farthest forward scoring body part, Emerson is measured by where the ball strikes him, that's kind skewed imo. I still think it either has to be onside or offside and keep anything subjective out of it. Rules are like this now and it would only be more complicated if you would allow some limbs to be in an offside position in some decisions. I'm all for only drawing lines from the furthest feet to make it more simple but those are not the rules now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 1 minute ago, cubaricho said: You keep missing the point that this has nothing to do with the decision. The offside rule is where the ball is when passed and then the furthest forward part of the body that can be used to score a goal of the person receiving the ball. It has nothing to do with how much of the passer's body is behind or ahead of the ball. I know the laws, my opinion of that kind of decision is that the law is wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, Pata said: I still think it either has to be onside or offside and keep anything subjective out of it. Rules are like this now and it would only be more complicated if you would allow some limbs to be in an offside position in some decisions. I'm all for only drawing lines from the furthest feet to make it more simple but those are not the rules now. Yeah i get you're point, i do this a lot but my two work colleagues who still ref (i don't because of my knee) who get the hump with me if i say rules, it's laws of the game, they get really humpy about it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pata Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Bimpy474 said: I know the laws, my opinion of that kind of decision is that the law is wrong. Didn't mean to imply you didn't know the laws, sorry. It's just impossible to give the striker 'fair' advantage as then the line would just be in a different spot but the arguments would be the same. Like striker gets 10cm leeway but the same conversations would be had if a striker is offside by 11cm. Edit. Thought the earlier was a reply to my post, sorry again. Edited October 26, 2022 by Pata Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnbull2000 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Champs League failures still dropping into Europa? Thought that was going to end ffs. It's fucking absurd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Pata said: Didn't mean to imply you didn't know the laws, sorry. It's just impossible to give the striker 'fair' advantage as then the line would just be in a different spot but the arguments would be the same. Like striker gets 10cm leeway but the same conversations would be had if a striker is offside by 11cm. I didn't take offence mate, apologises if you thought i had a dig back, that wasn't on purpose. I just look at decision and think measure things differently, as tgrave said it's a moot point, they won't change the laws anyway. Edited October 26, 2022 by Bimpy474 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 1 minute ago, Turnbull2000 said: Champs League failures still dropping into Europa? Thought that was going to end ffs. It's fucking absurd. It’s not too bad in some circumstances , say we got drawn with Real Madrid and Napoli next season - We could be out by the 4th game but it’s something to still play for and keeps it interesting whilst also I’m sure us as fans would be happy to give the europa a crack Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 2 minutes ago, Turnbull2000 said: Champs League failures still dropping into Europa? Thought that was going to end ffs. It's fucking absurd. Aye, it's so the bigger clubs who drop in get protection, i mean protection and second chance after being shite, seems fair. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 Just now, tgarve said: It’s not too bad in some circumstances , say we got drawn with Real Madrid and Napoli next season - We could be out by the 4th game but it’s something to still play for and keeps it interesting whilst also I’m sure us as fans would be happy to give the europa a crack Surely though if you don't qualify you should just drop out, I get we could get drawn against some big clubs, but it just seems so unfair a team who fail get a second chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turnbull2000 Posted October 26, 2022 Share Posted October 26, 2022 4 minutes ago, tgarve said: It’s not too bad in some circumstances , say we got drawn with Real Madrid and Napoli next season - We could be out by the 4th game but it’s something to still play for and keeps it interesting whilst also I’m sure us as fans would be happy to give the europa a crack I'm not even thinking about CL qualification. Europa League alone would be incredible. I'd be mightily pissed if we manage to qualify but get knocked out by a Champs League failure whose fans and players don't really want to be there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tomlynnherrington Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Correct decision to disallow the goal and again Tottenham players disagreed with a correct VAR decision when nowhere near the play. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 That's a pathetic decision for so many reasons that others have mentioned like. The main one that hasn't been mentioned is that they appear to be arbitrarily drawing a line where the ball is while it's in motion on a 25fps feed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Regardless of the rights and wrongs, ins and outs, lines and balls....can we agree its just funny? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Aye, coz it's Kane and it's Spurs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 And conte of course, whenever you see a manager running around celebrating like a dog that's just had a massive shit, only to find it was just a big fart, is amusing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now