Jump to content

Still not worthy of a thread


Recommended Posts

TheBrownBottle
1 hour ago, bobbydazzla said:

Rush keeper = goalie can be an outfield player

 

Fog man back = anyone can be goalie if they’re the last man in defence

 

Any other interpretation is quite simply utter nonsense 

 

 

 

 

They were both the same.  A goalie can play outfield normally.

 

One rule we did sometimes play is that any ‘fog man back’ or ‘rush goalie’ wasn’t  allowed to cross halfway in normal play.  So effectively a few players could be ‘it’ if they’re back first, but those players had to stay in their own half 

Link to post
Share on other sites

“Rush keeper” and “first man back” where I grew up. Where did “fog” come from?


Also had a modified version of the latter which was “last man back”, which was expectedly absolute chaos :lol: .

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheBrownBottle
1 hour ago, McCormick said:

“Rush keeper” and “first man back” where I grew up. Where did “fog” come from?


Also had a modified version of the latter which was “last man back”, which was expectedly absolute chaos :lol: .

fog - ordinal number, determiner

 

a person or thing coming before all others in order, time, amount, quality, or importance:

 

fog draa on that snout, divvunt be shan, that’s pua ladge

 

bagsies fog blast on that scoota

 

 

Edited by TheBrownBottle

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

fog - ordinal number, determiner

 

a person or thing coming before all others in order, time, amount, quality, or importance:

 

fog draa on that snout, divvunt be shan, that’s pua ladge

 

bagsies fog blast on that scoota

 

 

 

Or "first".

 

 

 

And I've no idea what "ladge" means 

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheBrownBottle
2 minutes ago, madras said:

Or "first".

 

 

 

And I've no idea what "ladge" means 

ladge - adjective

 

unfair; not treating people in an equal way, or not morally right

 

it was propa ladge when Dekka twokked me cowies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TheBrownBottle said:

ladge - adjective

 

unfair; not treating people in an equal way, or not morally right

 

it was propa ladge when Dekka twokked me cowies

New on me. Radge maybe ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

TheBrownBottle
13 minutes ago, madras said:

New on me. Radge maybe ?

Different meaning, though you could definitely rhyme them in a poem.  

 

 

Edited by TheBrownBottle

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TBG said:

image.png.38ab4e1fb7ab6be874b1abf9bebfb1a3.png

 

 

 

Could be our midfield if it wasn't for FFP

Offensive that he gets to share a pitch with someone so talented. Hendrick should put in a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, McCormick said:

“Rush keeper” and “first man back” where I grew up. Where did “fog” come from?


Also had a modified version of the latter which was “last man back”, which was expectedly absolute chaos :lol: .

 

"Runny keepers" and "first man back" in Hebburn!

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Would Roma have a higher ceiling than us?

 

I'm not entertaining the rumour by engaging in the debate but you could surely argue that Roma have a better chance of winning Serie A than we do of winning the Premier League? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The College Dropout

image.thumb.png.f8c221c4a25fc0a96c49499fc27d58b6.pngDesperately need another passed in midfield. Could be at CM or wide. We just need attackers that can pass it forward.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

The College Dropout
7 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

I'm not entertaining the rumour by engaging in the debate but you could surely argue that Roma have a better chance of winning Serie A than we do of winning the Premier League? 

Aye but what is that worth ?

 

Could they become a CL powerhouse like Juve of 5 years ago?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exiled in Texas

Being pedantic…

 

goalies are not restricted from playing out /up field. They are just the only ones permitted to use their hands which is why their shirt is a different color. But they can go anywhere on the field they want.

 

So by definition then rush-goalies has to be first-man-back. Else it’s just the keeper playing up/back

[/pedant]

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Exiled in Texas said:

Being pedantic…

 

goalies are not restricted from playing out /up field. They are just the only ones permitted to use their hands which is why their shirt is a different color. But they can go anywhere on the field they want.

 

So by definition then rush-goalies has to be first-man-back. Else it’s just the keeper playing up/back

[/pedant]


You try to explaining that to a gang of little Geordie radgies playing 7 a side with a caser ball on waste ground with jumpers for goalposts in Thatchers Britain

 

Rush keeper - the kid in goal has approval to also play outfield and it’s agreed he won’t get paggered for doing it by either his own team or the opposition 

 

Fog man back - anyone can be keeper, but only the 1st defender to reach the goalmouth can handle the ball without getting paggered by the opposition 

 

Any other interpretations are sheer lunacy 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:


You try to explaining that to a gang of little Geordie radgies playing 7 a side with a caser ball on waste ground with jumpers for goalposts in Thatchers Britain

 

Rush keeper - the kid in goal can play outfield and it’s agreed he won’t get paggered for doing it by either his own team or the opposition 

 

Fog man back - anyone can be keeper, but only the 1st defender to reach the goalmouth can handle the ball without getting paggered by the opposition 

 

Any other interpretations are sheer lunacy 

 

 

 

Thatchers bloody Britain. Fog man back and rush keeper were the same thing as far back as Heath's Britain

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Exiled in Texas said:

Being pedantic…

 

goalies are not restricted from playing out /up field. They are just the only ones permitted to use their hands which is why their shirt is a different color. But they can go anywhere on the field they want.

 

So by definition then rush-goalies has to be first-man-back. Else it’s just the keeper playing up/back

[/pedant]

 

That's why I so confidently stated rush in the first place. There was a Wiki article I found https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_goalie that seems to infer its unsurprisingly usually to even up teams with uneven numbers up but I still don't understand what extra rule it's actually implementing considering a 'keeper can venture upfield if they really wanted to anyway.

 

Granted I'm a southerner here so I'm fighting a losing battle if no one up north deemed rush goalies the same as me. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, madras said:

Thatchers bloody Britain. Fog man back and rush keeper were the same thing as far back as Heath's Britain

 

Possibly so, but I was conceived in '77 and wasn't playing footy on the streets in the Heath years

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exiled in Texas

And as a schoolboy in the early 80s…. The name “rush goalies” always confused me as Ian Rush never played goalie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...