Unbelievable Posted Thursday at 14:10 Share Posted Thursday at 14:10 1 minute ago, Fezzle said: The first one is about related market stuff, the results are due. Second is the 115 charges that will start soon Ok cheers, so the first one is of particular interest to us and the second one not so much..? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted Thursday at 14:10 Share Posted Thursday at 14:10 Yep Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted Thursday at 14:12 Share Posted Thursday at 14:12 From Man City's perspective I suppose the outcome of the first hearing will be of significant impact on their chances of winning the second one. If related party restrictions get lifted or relaxed for being anti-competitive, that undermines the PL's case against them massively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezzle Posted Thursday at 14:15 Share Posted Thursday at 14:15 Just now, Unbelievable said: From Man City's perspective I suppose the outcome of the first hearing will be of significant impact on their chances of winning the second one. If related party restrictions get lifted or relaxed for being anti-competitive, that undermines the PL's case against them massively. Arent many of the charges coming up about very shady payments/book cooking? Despite them clearly being bang to rights they will somehow get away with a fine or token points deduction as the PL would never open the can of worms of removing titles or relegation. Other clubs would line up to sue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted Thursday at 14:15 Share Posted Thursday at 14:15 Just now, Unbelievable said: From Man City's perspective I suppose the outcome of the first hearing will be of significant impact on their chances of winning the second one. If related party restrictions get lifted or relaxed for being anti-competitive, that undermines the PL's case against them massively. Not according to Stefan Borson, some of the 115 charges allege fraud🤷🏼♂️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Infinitely Content Posted Thursday at 14:24 Share Posted Thursday at 14:24 (edited) 16 hours ago, brummie said: Emery's two henchmen talking about PSR / FFP on TalkSpot today. Worth listening. That Damian Vidagany comes across really well. Not the usual business-speak bore, seems a passionate and knowledgable lover of the game. He has mannerisms and traits of our beloved Rafa. You lot have plenty to be grateful for, so very well ran with excellent people in place it would appear. I'm just glad we beat Villa regularly otherwise I'd start getting really bitter Edited Thursday at 14:25 by Infinitely Content Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted Thursday at 14:31 Share Posted Thursday at 14:31 I was just watching a Man City fan podcast thingy on those APR and 115 hearings just now, and they're on about Newcastle going mad if APR gets scrapped and no other club has a chance of competing with us with surprisingly little self awareness : Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted Thursday at 14:41 Share Posted Thursday at 14:41 23 minutes ago, Unbelievable said: From Man City's perspective I suppose the outcome of the first hearing will be of significant impact on their chances of winning the second one. If related party restrictions get lifted or relaxed for being anti-competitive, that undermines the PL's case against them massively. Yes but I think City's case specifically relates to the new more restrictive rules which came in earlier this year, rather than the rules at the time they are alleged to have breached. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted yesterday at 18:06 Share Posted yesterday at 18:06 NBC just saying that we won't know the outcome of the Man City stuff until the new year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted yesterday at 18:24 Share Posted yesterday at 18:24 16 minutes ago, cubaricho said: NBC just saying that we won't know the outcome of the Man City stuff until the new year. The 115 charges? That could be correct if the hearing commences mid September Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now