nufc4eva Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 22 hours ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Selling Gordon, Tino and Tonali while also needing several other replacement players would certainly be interesting. Well summer will certainly be transformational but could be transformed into actual relegation team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 42 minutes ago, Curva Sud Milano said: It's probably as you say, but the money you all think you're getting from Gordon is unrealistic. Even if we can't get 70m for Gordon we can get 60m, our full back tino will also likely depart for at least 50m. No way we need to raise 110m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 40 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Even if we can't get 70m for Gordon we can get 60m, our full back tino will also likely depart for at least 50m. No way we need to raise 110m Maybe we do if we want shot of the players who aren’t 100% committed to the club. We are losing / have lost some very good pros recently, Laschelles, Trippier, Kraft etc. no point forcing anyone to stay who doesn’t really really really want to be here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, Curva Sud Milano said: It's probably as you say, but the money you all think you're getting from Gordon is unrealistic. What is unrealistic? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, r0cafella said: We definitely don't have to sell him, we have other players who we either want to let go OR are closer to an exit. It also depends how big a rebuild we are going to do. A GK, MF and some back ups wont throw us into any must sell situation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 Multiple clubs in desperate need for a LW. £70m+ for Gordon isn't unrealistic Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, nufc123 said: What is unrealistic? Certainly not the rumoured asking price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 I want to keep him but only if he is committed and start putting everything into games again. Think all the rumours has messed with his head a bit. He is a top quality player. That said there are other players I would be much sadder to lose. The key is not selling him to Liverpool or any other premier league club! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curva Sud Milano Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 2 hours ago, nufc123 said: What is unrealistic? You have to consider that the player market in the UK is doped on player price tags... in a world where Elanga is paid 55 then Gordon is definitely worth 80, in the rest of Europe Elanga wouldn't be signed by anyone even for 25 and Gordon could be valued at 50 (maybe). We're not talking about someone like Bruno G. or a potential phenomenon like Hall who deserve high valuations... we're talking about a left winger who has problems with ball control and who technically is light years away from someone like Luis Diaz, aka the one he should be competing with for the spot !! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 2 minutes ago, Curva Sud Milano said: You have to consider that the player market in the UK is doped on player price tags... in a world where Elanga is paid 55 then Gordon is definitely worth 80, in the rest of Europe Elanga wouldn't be signed by anyone even for 25 and Gordon could be valued at 50 (maybe). We're not talking about someone like Bruno G. or a potential phenomenon like Hall who deserve high valuations... we're talking about a left winger who has problems with ball control and who technically is light years away from someone like Luis Diaz, aka the one he should be competing with for the spot !! Bayern Munich have already agreed terms by all reports, and we know Liverpool were prepared to pay £70m two years ago. Newcastle will sell players like Gordon and Tonali, but only if the price is right. Otherwise we could sell Wissa and Woltemade and raise funds if we need to. I think sales of Gordon and Tonali are only being considered because they want to leave, otherwise I think we are not in any desperate financial need to sell after the Isak sale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 13 minutes ago, Curva Sud Milano said: You have to consider that the player market in the UK is doped on player price tags... in a world where Elanga is paid 55 then Gordon is definitely worth 80, in the rest of Europe Elanga wouldn't be signed by anyone even for 25 and Gordon could be valued at 50 (maybe). We're not talking about someone like Bruno G. or a potential phenomenon like Hall who deserve high valuations... we're talking about a left winger who has problems with ball control and who technically is light years away from someone like Luis Diaz, aka the one he should be competing with for the spot !! I mean, you’re pretty much bang on with everything you’ve said. But I do think we’ll get £70 million for him from someone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curva Sud Milano Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 43 minutes ago, Elliottman said: I mean, you’re pretty much bang on with everything you’ve said. But I do think we’ll get £70 million for him from someone. In PL you could sell him for that price, there is zero chance that Bayern or anyone else in Europe would pay 70/80 for Gordon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curva Sud Milano Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 54 minutes ago, TRon said: Bayern Munich have already agreed terms by all reports, and we know Liverpool were prepared to pay £70m two years ago. Newcastle will sell players like Gordon and Tonali, but only if the price is right. Otherwise we could sell Wissa and Woltemade and raise funds if we need to. I think sales of Gordon and Tonali are only being considered because they want to leave, otherwise I think we are not in any desperate financial need to sell after the Isak sale. I'm pretty sure if Gordon played for Aston Villa or Man Utd none of you would want to buy him for 80. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 4 minutes ago, Curva Sud Milano said: I'm pretty sure if Gordon played for Aston Villa or Man Utd none of you would want to buy him for 80. You have already increased the price to £80m when I was suggesting £70m so I think you realise it's not an unreasonable fee. Our fans have gone cool on him because of the stories of him leaving, but just a couple months ago they were singing his name regularly. He's a proven performer, his stats back this up, and he can play as a striker as well. Of course he's worth £70m. Possibly more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 11 minutes ago, TRon said: You have already increased the price to £80m when I was suggesting £70m so I think you realise it's not an unreasonable fee. Our fans have gone cool on him because of the stories of him leaving, but just a couple months ago they were singing his name regularly. He's a proven performer, his stats back this up, and he can play as a striker as well. Of course he's worth £70m. Possibly more. Were we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, Curva Sud Milano said: You have to consider that the player market in the UK is doped on player price tags... in a world where Elanga is paid 55 then Gordon is definitely worth 80, in the rest of Europe Elanga wouldn't be signed by anyone even for 25 and Gordon could be valued at 50 (maybe). We're not talking about someone like Bruno G. or a potential phenomenon like Hall who deserve high valuations... we're talking about a left winger who has problems with ball control and who technically is light years away from someone like Luis Diaz, aka the one he should be competing with for the spot !! Maybe but we are not selling Gordon for 50m to Bayern. Half the PL will pay 50m for him so its not unrealistic as you say. Gordon will go for 65m+. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 24 minutes ago, Menace said: Were we? "Ohhhh! Anthony Gooordon...!" Yes we were, at the grounds, maybe not on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vedder Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 1 hour ago, nufc123 said: Maybe but we are not selling Gordon for 50m to Bayern. Half the PL will pay 50m for him so it’s not unrealistic as you say. Gordon will go for 65m+. Plus how much did Bayern pay for Jackson? They pay when they need to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyBlanco Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 Wouldn’t mind getting rid of Gordon as long as there is a concrete plan in place for getting someone in to fill the gap. After last summer I have absolutely zero confidence that this is the case in the slightest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElectricWizard Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 32 minutes ago, Vedder said: Plus how much did Bayern pay for Jackson? They pay when they need to. He is on loan at Bayern Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curva Sud Milano Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 4 hours ago, TRon said: You have already increased the price to £80m when I was suggesting £70m so I think you realise it's not an unreasonable fee. Our fans have gone cool on him because of the stories of him leaving, but just a couple months ago they were singing his name regularly. He's a proven performer, his stats back this up, and he can play as a striker as well. Of course he's worth £70m. Possibly more. City signed Semenyo for a similar fee to what you think is fair for Gordon... I don't think I'll offend anyone if I say that this two players are not technically and physically comparable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 4 minutes ago, Curva Sud Milano said: City signed Semenyo for a similar fee to what you think is fair for Gordon... I don't think I'll offend anyone if I say that this two players are not technically and physically comparable. Semenyo had a release clause for 65m. Gordon doesn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 If tonali tino gordon leave I think we will be in big trouble finding replacements along with all the released and leaving players to replace aswell. Could be around 12 players that need to be brought in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 3 minutes ago, HawK said: Semenyo had a release clause for 65m. Gordon doesn't. Gordon is also an England International and done it at CL. Was a gamble for citeh. Still is. Watch him today, and he's not the class they need imho (neither is Gordon) and they'll outgrow him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curva Sud Milano Posted May 16 Share Posted May 16 3 minutes ago, HawK said: Semenyo had a release clause for 65m. Gordon doesn't. I'll make you laugh, Leao has a €175m release clause...this summer, God willing, we'll get rid of him with the first idiot who offers us €60m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now