SUPERTOON Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Not a fan of Hojbjerg at all, but I’d rather a straight loan for him than spend any money on Onana. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Pardew Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 4 minutes ago, The Prophet said: No thanks. This lad doesn’t have the positional discipline that Young Eddie requires from his players. Can’t see it happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) He's dipped a bit this year, probably due to a lack of appearances, but his last few PL seasons have been strong. He'd improve us right now. Edited January 26 by Dr.Spaceman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Cherry Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Hojbjerg is wank, no thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Don’t think he’s wank but he in no way improves us if we have a squad mostly fit. Would he do a job for us for half a season? Probably if that’s all we can afford Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) 2 minutes ago, gbandit said: Don’t think he’s wank but he in no way improves us if we have a squad mostly fit. Would he do a job for us for half a season? Probably if that’s all we can afford Surely he's a better option than Longstaff and Miley (as of today), who have both in the first team squad more often than not. And the state of some of our benches this season....he can replace one of the pointless defenders, surely? Unless you think having Murphy (the irish defender) on the bench is a better shout Edited January 26 by Dr.Spaceman Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Original source is the Chronicle. He's a nothing player, but he'd give us another option until the end of the season I suppose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 12 minutes ago, The Prophet said: No thanks. Hmmm....nah Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 14 minutes ago, The Prophet said: No thanks. Like Levy will do us any sort of favour ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 11 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said: Not a fan of Hojbjerg at all, but I’d rather a straight loan for him than spend any money on Onana. Definitely. Not willing to help Everton out their hole again and not for the money flying around. Would rather sign Emerson in the summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) Think he'd be a good loan deal with no option. Edited January 26 by Optimistic Nut Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Nucasol said: Like Levy will do us any sort of favour ? This, it would probably cost us more on the loan deal, than signing someone outright Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 Hojbjerg is a steady eddy DM. I could see why he'd be considered as a plan c loan if we can't shuffle our cards around to create finance. Let's remember, it could come down to whether we have to change formation if we lose any more midfielders to injuries. A loan deal for a bonefide PL midfielder might not be that shocking. Hardly ideal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmesy Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 I think he's a lot better player than most are giving credit for. He hasn't always been the steady type #6 he is now and I reckon Eddie could improve him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 22 minutes ago, Max Cherry said: Hojbjerg is wank, no thanks never understood why wank was used as a negative term - I love them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sushimonster85 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Gawalls said: never understood why wank was used as a negative term - I love them I think it works well in this instance, not that Max intended it this way. Obviously not what you want ideally, but good when you have no other option and need a quick fix. Edited January 26 by sushimonster85 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 3 hours ago, r0cafella said: They also have FFP issues True but that's kinda the point, they might be able squeeze 18m or whatever out of somewhere but they ain't gonna sign Osimhen or whoever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 27 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said: Surely he's a better option than Longstaff and Miley (as of today), who have both in the first team squad more often than not. And the state of some of our benches this season....he can replace one of the pointless defenders, surely? Unless you think having Murphy (the irish defender) on the bench is a better shout Well yeah, the issue is our squad is decimated so he us of more value on the bench than some random academy player who will not make it through to the first team. Do I think he’s a better option than Sean or Miley? Probably not, he’d take time to adjust to our system and playing with a whole new set of players. Four months of football where he wouldn’t be first choice and get up to match speed unless there were injuries means that his sole value is coming in to provide a decent back up if injuries continue. That’s my opinion anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vicente_14 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 26 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Like Levy will do us any sort of favour ? This. The loan fee he would ask from us would be off the charts crazy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrRaspberryJam Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 13 minutes ago, Gawalls said: never understood why wank was used as a negative term - I love them short term relief in this scenario as it’s only a loan deal as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 5 minutes ago, gbandit said: Well yeah, the issue is our squad is decimated so he us of more value on the bench than some random academy player who will not make it through to the first team. Do I think he’s a better option than Sean or Miley? Probably not, he’d take time to adjust to our system and playing with a whole new set of players. Four months of football where he wouldn’t be first choice and get up to match speed unless there were injuries means that his sole value is coming in to provide a decent back up if injuries continue. That’s my opinion anyway I think a lot of people are underestimating him personally. Bloke had three MotM performances last season, Longstaff has had one in his entire PL career (two overall inc. cups). We've not got a DM like him who's as positionally aware as he is. He'd allow us to mix it up tactically. And he's 28 - he's not going to take months to get up to speed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 We can't be taking Spurs reserves on loan mind , it would be embarrassing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheikBoom Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Geogaddi said: We can't be taking Spurs reserves on loan mind , it would be embarrassing. It wouldn't though? We don't have a no6 and he would do a solid job for half a season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 1 minute ago, Geogaddi said: We can't be taking Spurs reserves on loan mind , it would be embarrassing. Not as embarrassing as this post Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 26 Share Posted January 26 2 minutes ago, Geogaddi said: We can't be taking Spurs reserves on loan mind , it would be embarrassing. It’s going to be embarrassing running Miley and Longstaff every game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now