NUFC Transfer Rumours

[Bimpy474]

The impatience makes the paranoia worse.  The theories get more and more bizarre. The demented go more and more off their collective nuts.

 

Once the first proper buy happens the calm will again spread among the lost.

 

Fucking lunatics.

[Irish Magpie]

3 hours ago, Zero said:

Yes we still have five weeks.

 

First match against Southampton is 3 weeks tomorrow.

[KaKa]

Just now, Bimpy474 said:

The impatience makes the paranoia worse.  The theories get more and more bizarre. The demented go more and more off their collective nuts.

 

Once the first proper buy happens the calm will again spread among the lost.

 

Fucking lunatics.

 

 

It's astonishing man.

 

I mean, I'm really looking forward to seeing who comes in, but folks are losing it completely.

 

[kingxlnc]

To be honest it does show the behaviour of addicts, and withdrawal symptoms when the new dopamine hit has not yet arrived 

 

maybe we all need more purpose in our lives  

[HayDen Traces]

Just wait until the window ends. I'll bet money we've got a new RCB & RW by then. 

It's been a slow market for most clubs, not just us (who've undergone a big leadership change). 

We'll be fine lads, just sit tight.

[Pixelphish]

13 minutes ago, Bimpy474 said:

The impatience makes the paranoia worse.  The theories get more and more bizarre. The demented go more and more off their collective nuts.

 

Once the first proper buy happens the calm will again spread among the lost.

 

Fucking lunatics.

 

Just wait until we sign Mctominay.

[beardsleymagic]

Although I agree we shouldn't just rush in and buy somebody without making sure they are right for the squad, the fact is we have a favourable start to the season.

Are we not missing a trick by trying to have a couple of quality players in and hopefully having a flying start to the season? 

I would have hoped that the club would have also thought this after the fixtures came out.

Leicester showed what a good start and momentum and belief can do if things fall right for you.

[SteV]

1 minute ago, beardsleymagic said:

Although I agree we shouldn't just rush in and buy somebody without making sure they are right for the squad, the fact is we have a favourable start to the season.

Are we not missing a trick by trying to have a couple of quality players in and hopefully having a flying start to the season? 

I would have hoped that the club would have also thought this after the fixtures came out.

Leicester showed what a good start and momentum and belief can do if things fall right for you.

Rushing to buy someone that we’re not convinced about because we want them to play against Southampton at home, is not a coherent and robust transfer strategy.

[Checko]

There's quite a good episode of the Overlap where they discuss who should have final say in bringing in players at a football club.

 

One thing people could agree on was that bringing in the wrong player can set you back a long way.

[stozo]

Will be interesting to see if we get outbounds sorted before inbounds. You would assume that our budget is very different if we sell Trippier, Almiron, Wilson etc. Vs. if we don't do that. Shifting those three opens up circa. £35m of allowable spend a.k.a potentially three £50m players. 

[beardsleymagic]

13 minutes ago, SteV said:

Rushing to buy someone that we’re not convinced about because we want them to play against Southampton at home, is not a coherent and robust transfer strategy.

To be fair I started my post by saying we shouldn't rush in and buy somebody for the sake of it.

 

[Tiresias]

Again agents aren't exactly motivated to help moves happen quickly, know it can and is done but their leverage does get better if they delay and look for competition. It's not as simple as club just deciding lets do it early. Club can say we do it now or not at all, but agents know if the club really wants someone probably means they'll come back, or someone else will have em. Honestly I think it's why so much effort goes in to tapping up players in advance so the player just insists to get it over and done with so they can move, but our director of football situation has probably harmed that. 

[SweMag]

 

[Coffee_Johnny]

1 hour ago, Groundhog63 said:

 

Surely you mean "under" his head if you're referring to little Dennis

A 5’ 8” giant of a personality towering over a 5’6” weasel of a man child. 

[Coffee_Johnny]

So hated Wise having anything to do with us. 

 

 

Edited yesterday at 07:50 by Coffee_Johnny

[Skeletor]

1 minute ago, SweMag said:

 

 

[Coffee_Johnny]

1 hour ago, Groundhog63 said:

 

Surely you mean "under" his head if you're referring to little Dennis

A laws of physics defying huge two inch gap. 

 

 

Edited yesterday at 07:52 by Coffee_Johnny

[Joey47]

1 minute ago, SweMag said:

 

Interesting, football insider not the best source but if they were just farming clicks wouldn’t they go with “bid made” or “interest shown”?

[SteV]

5 minutes ago, beardsleymagic said:

To be fair I started my post by saying we shouldn't rush in and buy somebody for the sake of it.

 

So you’d already answered your own question really.

[aussiemag]

I think Howe could transform Madueke into a Gordon level player quite quickly. 

[SUPERTOON]

23 minutes ago, SteV said:

Rushing to buy someone that we’re not convinced about because we want them to play against Southampton at home, is not a coherent and robust transfer strategy.

You would imagine in a summer window you are already sure of all your targets before it opens ?

[SUPERTOON]

7 minutes ago, SweMag said:

 

Someone better tell Chelsea and Madueke then, he did an interview a couple of days back saying he is their number one RW this season.

[Ben]

Is he any good ?

[Lee Charnley]

You'd all be calling me every cunt under the sun if we hadn't made a signing by now.

[gbandit]

Would be delighted with Madueke. Don’t want to give Chelsea cash but hopefully we can stiff them as they need to offload some squad members