Jump to content

NUFC Transfer Rumours


Guest

Recommended Posts

We should've went for lower targets if we couldn't get our first choices in, imo.

 

We should've been looking at Ryan Fraser, Isaac Hayden and Matt Targett for example. If we'd signed those three, they'd would've done a great job for us as second choices and definitely wouldn't have ended up hanging around too long costing us money on long-term contracts and stopping us from pursuing higher quality players later. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, bowlingcrofty said:

We should've went for lower targets if we couldn't get our first choices in, imo.

 

We should've been looking at Ryan Fraser, Isaac Hayden and Matt Targett for example. If we'd signed those three, they'd would've done a great job for us as second choices and definitely wouldn't have ended up hanging around too long costing us money on long-term contracts and stopping us from pursuing higher quality players later. 


correct. There are absolutely no players in the world in between the qualities of Marc Guehi and Ryan Fraser.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Shearergol said:

Serious questions need to be asked before heads roll 

It is an underrated possibility on here than Staveley went because of the PSR disaster. I would not be surprised to see action here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jagten said:

It is an underrated possibility on here than Staveley went because of the PSR disaster. I would not be surprised to see action here. 

Who are they gonna sack/punish? Genuine question. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shearergol said:


correct. There are absolutely no players in the world in between the qualities of Marc Guehi and Ryan Fraser.

They are three perfect examples of players who were signed because they were 'decent signings'. 

 

In the situation we're in, where we need to improve our first team, not just fill up the squad, and where we have limited room for manoeuvre because of arbitrary financial rules, signing nobody is preferable to blobbing money on a gamble that backfires and has you bogged down financially for years afterwards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, bowlingcrofty said:

They are three perfect examples of players who were signed because they were 'decent signings'. 

 

In the situation we're in, where we need to improve our first team, not just fill up the squad, and where we have limited room for manoeuvre because of arbitrary financial rules, signing nobody is preferable to blobbing money on a gamble that backfires and has you bogged down financially for years afterwards.

Wonder what changed since we signed them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shearergol said:

Wonder what changed since we signed them.

What changed is that we now have a good first team so signing improvements is much more difficult. 

 

The post-takeover equivalents would be better players, obviously, but still would potentially leave us with the same problem. 

 

I don't think it's a difficult concept, is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, bowlingcrofty said:

What changed is that we now have a good first team so signing improvements is much more difficult. 

 

The post-takeover equivalents would be better players, obviously, but still would potentially leave us with the same problem. 

 

I don't think it's a difficult concept, is it?

You’ve named 3 shit players. There’s a reason we can’t shift them. Most other teams don’t really seem to have that issue.

 

ashley lumbered the club with shit players on long overpaid contracts. 
 

every club in the league signs squad players. Even Man City.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...