Erikse Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 19 minutes ago, Rafalove said: Is Troy Deeney actually this dense, or is he just clickbaiting? Either way he’s rapidly turning in to the worst pundit around. Bet he has seen him play no more than 3 times at best, and is jumping to conclusions based on that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 He was saying Salah isn’t world class the other day. The perfect blend of stupidity and wanting attention for his shit opinions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 17 minutes ago, Geordie Ahmed said: I think he's just an absolute doylem A Troylem, if you will Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elliottman Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 3 minutes ago, Erikse said: Bet he has seen him play no more than 3 times at best, and is jumping to conclusions based on that. He’ll be basing it on the one mistake Tino made against Arsenal I think in otherwise a near perfect performance. What a dickhead to be going after a young lad who’s just made his England debut. Tosser. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 15 minutes ago, Elliottman said: He’ll be basing it on the one mistake Tino made against Arsenal I think in otherwise a near perfect performance. What a dickhead to be going after a young lad who’s just made his England debut. Tosser. Yeah, Deeney is definitely not the "full shilling". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted November 22 Share Posted November 22 Martin O'Neill schooled him on TalkShite the other day, it was a joy to watch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted December 4 Share Posted December 4 What do we think about Tino? He's not quite the player I expected TBH, I thought he would be much more attacking but it seems defending is by far the strongest part of his game. I know he's played a lot with Longstaff inside him and a random ahead, TBF. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinoasprilla Posted December 4 Share Posted December 4 Agree he’s a shadow of the player he was last season which to coin a phrase form is temporary. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted December 4 Share Posted December 4 (edited) 4 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: What do we think about Tino? He's not quite the player I expected TBH, I thought he would be much more attacking but it seems defending is by far the strongest part of his game. I know he's played a lot with Longstaff inside him and a random ahead, TBF. Edited December 4 by Sima Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weezertron Posted December 4 Share Posted December 4 (edited) What do I think? Lush lad with questionable facial hair but he’s young and it’ll fill in, and become quite the look. It’s a metaphor! (I’m pissed) Edited December 4 by Weezertron Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 6 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: What do we think about Tino? He's not quite the player I expected TBH, I thought he would be much more attacking but it seems defending is by far the strongest part of his game. I know he's played a lot with Longstaff inside him and a random ahead, TBF. He needs a proper footballer who wants to cut inside in front of him. He's a wingback who needs to woke on his ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 Aye, his major attacking trait is to blast past the winger on the outside... couldnt do it last night with murph there. Looks like we need to sign another winger who likes to come inside (inverted). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 I thought he was quite good. Had that poor moment he was sacked, but I put that down to him wanting to keep the ball and no-one showing. If the team had confidence to play balls back to the GK in those situations, it helps us enormously. Many times in that game, he took players on in tight spaces on the byline, and it broke the press. That’s a key skill of his. Confidence never dropped with the ball and retaining under pressure after that first half mistake, which was important for me. Very good player who will continue to go up levels. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 5 minutes ago, Sibierski said: I thought he was quite good. Had that poor moment he was sacked, but I put that down to him wanting to keep the ball and no-one showing. If the team had confidence to play balls back to the GK in those situations, it helps us enormously. Many times in that game, he took players on in tight spaces on the byline, and it broke the press. That’s a key skill of his. Confidence never dropped with the ball and retaining under pressure after that first half mistake, which was important for me. Very good player who will continue to go up levels. He was fouled there by the way Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geogaddi Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 (edited) He definitely looked a lot better last season , still think he is a better player than he has showed this season. Hall now looks the better player, not that we should be comparing the two really. Edited December 5 by Geogaddi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 Great defensively imo. going forward he’s a good ball carrier and dribbler. But often poor with his passing and delivery. I think he should try more inside runs and cutbacks. When he’s wide I’ve got no faith in his delivery. Doesn’t have a great relationship with any players down his side but the options there haven’t impressed. I can someone like Isak prefers to drift left. I like him and he’s usually solid defensively but he does have to work on his game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 He'll never get a game for Portugal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonny1403 Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 17 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: Great defensively imo. going forward he’s a good ball carrier and dribbler. But often poor with his passing and delivery. I think he should try more inside runs and cutbacks. When he’s wide I’ve got no faith in his delivery. Doesn’t have a great relationship with any players down his side but the options there haven’t impressed. I can someone like Isak prefers to drift left. I like him and he’s usually solid defensively but he does have to work on his game. This is it though isn’t it. He doesn’t have a reliable partner to work with. It changes every week between five different players. And even if we do regularly start Murphy going forward the quality isn’t there. meanwhile Hall gets to benefit from gaining an understanding with Gordon every week who is actually capable of retaining the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 I actually think Gordon doesn’t protect Hall that well. I would’ve been tempted to start both Joes against Liverpool but that definitely wasn’t the right decision (i would’ve assumed TAA started). But we should’ve got Willock on at 2-1 or whenever Trent came on. But Hall can play with Bruno, Joe, Gordon or Isak. Lives Longstaff Murphy is so ugly I never want to see it from the start again. Livra must accept some responsibility for how bad that football is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 Gordon doesn't protect Hall in the sense of coming back and being on his toes, protects him by being a reliable outlet ball high up the pitch where it's retained. That's so helpful when at full back, knowing you've got someone you can pass too and it not come straight back, where you are potentially out of position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 Almiron is a weak RW, but one thing I've always felt comfortable with him is his ball retention. Surprised we don't see him at all this season, must be a bit of "trying to make you want to leave" decision to his game time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 Just now, Sibierski said: Almiron is a weak RW, but one thing I've always felt comfortable with him is his ball retention. Surprised we don't see him at all this season, must be a bit of "trying to make you want to leave" decision to his game time. Yeah, he's certainly getting frozen out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 2 minutes ago, Sibierski said: Gordon doesn't protect Hall in the sense of coming back and being on his toes, protects him by being a reliable outlet ball high up the pitch where it's retained. That's so helpful when at full back, knowing you've got someone you can pass too and it not come straight back, where you are potentially out of position. You can't do that in a 4-3-3. The LCM and LW need to offer some protection to the FB, especially one like Hall who is useful further forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 He’s an absolute bull of a 1 v 1 defender at this age. Going to be wild to see him continue develop that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Checko Posted December 5 Share Posted December 5 (edited) 8 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: You can't do that in a 4-3-3. The LCM and LW need to offer some protection to the FB, especially one like Hall who is useful further forward. I dunno, I may well be wrong about this, but I've definitely seen games where from Gordon's positioning it's looked like he was under instruction not to come back too deep and position himself as a counter attacking outlet instead, while the LCM comes over to cover. If anyone on here is secretly a player, please confirm one way or the other. Edited December 5 by Checko grammar Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now