Ikon Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Just now, Fak said: Elanga has a higher ceiling. Aye probably , but he won’t be a transformational signing for us. That and that he lacks some important attributes that a proper footballer needs. He isn’t going to the top or even near. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 6 minutes ago, Ikon said: A 50-60m player should be transformative for us. There’s not much between Elanga and Murphy. I disagree, but I think the only reason you can even say that and it not sound totally ridiculous is because of what Howe and the coaching staff have got out of Murphy, something Elanga doesn't have. Before Howe Murphy looked every bit a standard Championship player. Elanga is now already a player that's hit almost a goal or assist every other game in the Premier League, without Howe's coaching and 7 years younger. There's no reason he can't be transformative if you trust Howe's ability to massively improve players consistently. Edited 14 hours ago by Kid Icarus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 7 minutes ago, McCormick said: 50m for Elanga is good business. Half our reported budget? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aussiemag Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Kvaratskhelia was 67 mill pounds and earns 250,000 pounds per week. Thats a transformative signing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Quite surprised by the level of angst, like. I think those who think it's 'boring' forget that - due to how the Premier League has gone way beyond any other league out there - most of the best players are already here. Certainly the best attacking players. PSR limits us to being risk averse, therefore it's sensible for us to use the domestic market, despite its inflated fees. We don't have the flexibility afforded to say Chelsea and Man Utd on account of their financial capacity, or say Brighton and Brentford on account of their modest aims. If we're going to keep swinging at the CL places and possibly the title, we need as close to a guarantee as possible. You're only going to get that if they've already demonstrated their capability here. No beef at all if he's our top target. The boss has demonstrated continuously that he knows what he's doing in the transfer market. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kenlau88210 Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago He will fit us to a tee. Great pace, two footed, delivers a good cross. Happy with him and Murphy at RW next season. Hopefully we can negotiate for a good deal sth like 45m Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 13 minutes ago, KaKa said: Okay, let's wait and see when that £60 million bid comes in for him. I'd personally take £50m at this point to be honest. But aye let's see. Fingers crossed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, aussiemag said: Kvaratskhelia was 67 mill pounds and earns 250,000 pounds per week. Thats a transformative signing. Never played against Fulham though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, aussiemag said: Kvaratskhelia was 67 mill pounds and earns 250,000 pounds per week. Thats a transformative signing. We can't afford to pay players that much p/w Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Yorkie said: Quite surprised by the level of angst, like. I think those who think it's 'boring' forget that - due to how the Premier League has gone way beyond any other league out there - most of the best players are already here. Certainly the best attacking players. PSR limits us to being risk averse, therefore it's sensible for us to use the domestic market, despite its inflated fees. We don't have the flexibility afforded to say Chelsea and Man Utd on account of their financial capacity, or say Brighton and Brentford on account of their modest aims. If we're going to keep swinging at the CL places and possibly the title, we need as close to a guarantee as possible. You're only going to get that if they've already demonstrated their capability here. No beef at all if he's our top target. The boss has demonstrated continuously that he knows what he's doing in the transfer market. Risk averse, despite our best signings being from the foreign markets? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Yorkie said: Quite surprised by the level of angst, like. I think those who think it's 'boring' forget that - due to how the Premier League has gone way beyond any other league out there - most of the best players are already here. Certainly the best attacking players. PSR limits us to being risk averse, therefore it's sensible for us to use the domestic market, despite its inflated fees. We don't have the flexibility afforded to say Chelsea and Man Utd on account of their financial capacity, or say Brighton and Brentford on account of their modest aims. If we're going to keep swinging at the CL places and possibly the title, we need as close to a guarantee as possible. You're only going to get that if they've already demonstrated their capability here. No beef at all if he's our top target. The boss has demonstrated continuously that he knows what he's doing in the transfer market. wait, what? You mean Salah, Isak and Haaland I assume? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toonjam88 Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago I’ve been reading Forest Forums and they would be gutted to loose him. They reckon him and MGW are their most important players and they reckon Elanga will be worth much more than £50 million in a few years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 12 minutes ago, McCormick said: 50m for Elanga is good business. …for FOREST Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Just now, Toonjam88 said: I’ve been reading Forest Forums and they would be gutted to loose him. They reckon him and MGW are their most important players and they reckon Elanga will be worth much more than £50 million in a few years Shame we can’t get MGW. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said: I disagree, but I think the only reason you can even say that and it not sound totally ridiculous is because of what Howe and the coaching staff have got out of Murphy, something Elanga doesn't have. Before Howe Murphy looked every bit a standard Championship player. Elanga is now already a player that's hit almost a goal or assist every other game in the Premier League, without Howe's coaching and 7 years younger. You make it it sound like Nuno is Bruce or similar. Like Nuno hasn’t got the best out of him. A manager that is bloody perfect in his style and setup for a player like Elanga. If we are being unbiased here then I’d say what Nuno has done in the league this season overall exceeds what Howe has done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Just now, Toonjam88 said: I’ve been reading Forest Forums and they would be gutted to loose him. They reckon him and MGW are their most important players and they reckon Elanga will be worth much more than £50 million in a few years Not sure if anyone noticed but forest play a completely different system to us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Toonjam88 said: I’ve been reading Forest Forums and they would be gutted to loose him. They reckon him and MGW are their most important players and they reckon Elanga will be worth much more than £50 million in a few years BuT HeS NOt FORIn. He'd be a good signing. For a certain price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Just now, STM said: BuT HeS NOt FORIn. He'd be a good signing. For a certain price. He is foreign. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Just now, SUPERTOON said: He is foreign. That's a sterling point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago (edited) I can see how he can be an asset but so underwhelming.. I've been hoping for years for some genuine football quality from that position - touch, vision, free kick ability, curled left footed shots.. where's our scouting really? fucking Chelsea have like 3 brazilians that match the description and probably won't ever play for them, yet would be first choice for us after a season with Eddie. Yep, the only left footed players Eddie has bought are Targett and Botman. Not good enough Edited 14 hours ago by junkhead Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago Just now, STM said: BuT HeS NOt FORIn. He'd be a good signing. For a certain price. Absolutely nothing to do with his nationality. I was happy with Gordon, elated with Barnes. Elanga would be good for us, but I want so,done to be great for us, like Bruno, Tonali, Isak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, Ikon said: You make it it sound like Nuno is Bruce or similar. Like Nuno hasn’t got the best out of him. A manager that is bloody perfect in his style and setup for a player like Elanga. If we are being unbiased here then I’d say what Nuno has done in the league this season overall exceeds what Howe has done. I definitely wouldn't say that, no. I've been saying all season that Forest aren't actually very good, that how they play isn't sustainable, and their league position was a lie. That being said, they've still got good players and Elanga is one of them imo. Forest aren't anywhere near as good as us. Edited 14 hours ago by Kid Icarus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Shearergol said: wait, what? You mean Salah, Isak and Haaland I assume? Those are three of the best players and all of them are already here yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago This is like when I did THE PLANETS as a science project two years in a row. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 14 hours ago Share Posted 14 hours ago 1 minute ago, Kid Icarus said: I definitely wouldn't say that, no. I've been saying all season that Forest aren't actually very good, that how they play isn't sustainable, and their league position was a lie. That being said, they've still got good players and Elanga is one of them imo. Forest aren't anywhere near as good as us. That’s because their players aren’t as good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now