Jump to content

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

Doesn’t mean that housing will be built. The land can still be sold by them say to the club if they want to build a stadium.

 

Hopefully the housing does get built as that is more important than a stadium.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

How about if we demolish London, throw the bricks in the Thames, and then move the Theatre Royal to Beamish

Now you're thinking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

Hopefully the housing does get built as that is more important than a stadium.

It won’t be social housing you can bet on that, there might be a tiny proportion available for rent and believe me it won’t be affordable rent that will help homeless people. If they were to build all social housing on the site I’d fully agree with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

It won’t be social housing you can bet on that, there might be a tiny proportion available for rent and believe me it won’t be affordable rent that will help homeless people. If they were to build all social housing on the site I’d fully agree with you.

 

We need to build housing for all purposes, the country is in a housing emergency across all levels.

 

 

Edited by El Prontonise

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, El Prontonise said:

 

Hopefully the housing does get built as that is more important than a stadium.

Any reasons why we can't have both ? Loads of brownfield just off the length of Scotswood road and the added economic benefits of a new stadium and successful football cl7b.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Abacus said:

I know, let's just bulldoze the Theatre Royal and move the whole thing brick by brick to London.

 

Move the Spurs stadium brick by brick to the arena site and jobs a good un.

Link to post
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

We need to build housing for all purposes, the country is in a housing emergency across all levels.

 

 

 

Sorry but the need for social housing far outweighs the needs of private housing development.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

Sorry but the need for social housing far outweighs the needs of private housing development.

 

I didn't say it wasn't , it was you who said the scheme is only worth it if it's social housing.  I said all types of housing need to build.

 

 

Edited by El Prontonise

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Orphanage said:

Listen , Fast Eddie sez hes measured the land down there ( Arena ) and its just not big enough . Fuck knows how he measured it like 

Cock lengths

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

I spent several years accompanying my uncle with severe MD to SJP on a match day - believe me, getting to the Leazes end was no picnic for him.  He struggled with that.  Walking from central station to the arena (as we did for boxing one night) was a shitload easier. 

Appreciate what you're saying. Directly there, no question. From already being in the city centre it's a different story in terms of getting to the arena, but especially coming back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, manorpark said:

 

I think he is just "too old" for some of the kiddiewinkies on here, that's all.

 

:lol: how patronising. 

 

My beef with him is that he's a know-nowt gobshite. 

 

I thought he was harmless enough until he started harassing the perfectly decent NUFC against sportswashing lads, wittering on about how human rights abuses aren't a thing in Saudi.

 

It's the sort of shite that just makes the fanbase look like bootlickers. I also generally just cba with the narcissistic attention-seeking you get from the likes of him. I've actually tried to engage with him a couple of times in comments sections and he just doesn't want to know unless you're kissing his arse. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Yorkie said:

 

:lol: how patronising. 

 

 

 

Not in the slightest bit patronising, it shines out in so many of the comments about him.

 

I have never found the need to judge the quality of peoples opinions based on their age, but that is a very common occurrence on here.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, manorpark said:

 

Not in the slightest bit patronising, it shines out in so many of the comments about him.

 

I have never found the need to judge the quality of peoples opinions based on their age, but that is a very common occurrence on here.

 

I guess this is why Adam Pearson is universally adored around these parts, then. :rolleyes:

 

Tbh I think the average age of regular contributors on here is far, far older than it was. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...