Jump to content

Recommended Posts

56 minutes ago, Stifler said:

He’s using it as a joke.

 

Zero chance that they go with an expanded SJP, it doesn’t provide enough seats, it doesn’t provide enough corporate space, and it doesn’t allow SJP to be more easily used for other events.


And the Stack vote, of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Given that summary of the Isak saga is that we could not afford to keep him, when the holy f is progress going to be made:

 

Arsenal - new stadium

Man City - new stadium

Tottenham - new stadium

Chelsea - revamped stadium

Liverpool - revamped stadium

Man U - planning new stadium

Newcastle - took down the SD sign and expanded the shop, some expansion of corporate packages

 

 

 

 

Edited by OverThere

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Given that summary of the Isak saga is that we could not afford to keep him, when the holy f is progress going to be made:

 

Arsenal - new stadium

Man City - new stadium

Tottenham - new stadium

Chelsea - revamped stadium

Liverpool - revamped stadium

Man U - planning new stadium

Newcastle - took down the SD sign and expanded the shop, some expansion of corporate packages

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don't forget pigeon carcass removal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Elma said:

 

Don't forget pigeon carcass removal.

I didn't realize that the might of the PIF had ticked that one off the "to do" list.

 

I was wrong on Chelsea, they have a 1.5 B project to tear down and rebuild Stamford Bridge in the works.

 

 

Edited by OverThere

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, duo said:

We'll never be able to compete financially without a new stadium.  We need the extra revenue it'd bring.

Exactly.

 

That is why I bumped the post.

 

You can trace the Isak saga right back to revenue being the problem, and by implication a new stadium being absolutely necessary.

 

If we dont get it done, get ready for history repeating with <fill in the blank>.

 

PIF are disinterested most of the time IMO. Still no CEO after almost a year, who does that?

 

 

Edited by OverThere

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could probably do with some good news regarding a new stadium right now to help lift the spirits around the club (even though I think we're a really solid group within the players, who are likely feeling really galvanized at the moment). Just more of a big picture optics type thing. Bring us into rendering season our Saudi overlords.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would think a decision could be made in terms of well we are going, and our aim is to make is approx. this big and it we would roughly like it to look like this. Now we will work on the exact location.

 

Give us something. Hire someone to do it if you cant be bothered. Its called PR, a vision, a roadmap.

 

Where are we going right now to be #1, Mr Chairman????

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HayDen Traces said:

I understand the criticism. But I think the new CEO gets announced in next few weeks and the stadium plans shortly after


Agreed. Think from now until next window there will be a couple of senior appointments and at least some hints on the new stadium plans.

 

Things are definitely going on in the background. Patience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LFEE said:


Agreed. Think from now until next window there will be a couple of senior appointments and at least some hints on the new stadium plans.

 

Things are definitely going on in the background. Patience.

I hope so, Luke. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OverThere said:

Given that summary of the Isak saga is that we could not afford to keep him, when the holy f is progress going to be made:

 

Arsenal - new stadium

Man City - new stadium

Tottenham - new stadium

Chelsea - revamped stadium

Liverpool - revamped stadium

Man U - planning new stadium

Newcastle - took down the SD sign and expanded the shop, some expansion of corporate packages

 

 

 

 

 

Man U planning new stadium by releasing a load of CGIs and no actually going on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, OverThere said:

Given that summary of the Isak saga is that we could not afford to keep him, when the holy f is progress going to be made:

 

Arsenal - new stadium

Man City - new stadium

Tottenham - new stadium

Chelsea - revamped stadium

Liverpool - revamped stadium

Man U - planning new stadium

Newcastle - took down the SD sign and expanded the shop, some expansion of corporate packages

 

City never had a new Stadium they were already at the ground. Training ground is where City owners excelled 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, buzz said:

 

Why would you even ask that question. Proper embarrassing :lol: 

exactly.

interviewer has obviously never seen any other training complexes.

 

 

Edited by huss9

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, HayDen Traces said:

I understand the criticism. But I think the new CEO gets announced in next few weeks and the stadium plans shortly after

 

This.

 

New CEO will absolutely want some oversight/approval of any of the plans as he's the bloke who's going to be responsible for delivering it. So that'll have delayed things a bit.

 

I am totally chilled about the whole thing, these things take years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Danh1 said:

Man U planning new stadium by releasing a load of CGIs and no actually going on.

 

NUFC are doing the opposite. Progressing with an actual development in the shadows and only announcing when oven ready to go.

 

 

Edited by ponsaelius

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toonpack said:

 

This.

 

New CEO will absolutely want some oversight/approval of any of the plans as he's the bloke who's going to be responsible for delivering it. So that'll have delayed things a bit.

 

I am totally chilled about the whole thing, these things take years.

They takes years to build - it doesn’t take this long to establish a scope and purchase a site.   

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, ponsaelius said:

 

NUFC are doing the opposite. Progressing with an actual development in the shadows and only announcing when it actually oven ready to go.

Which would be a first for PIF / KSA and completely against their MO when it comes to large scale civil or construction projects.  Wishful thinking methinks. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...