mrmojorisin75 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 I've got no time at all for him as a person, however a motivated Kieron Dyer is one of the best assets this club has. how can you make statements like this? is it a bad joke? he's certainly not an asset on the pitch is he? statistics and peoples own eyes tell us that he doesn't sell shirts as such or raise our profile with any audience i can think of, therefore he's not a commercial asset what other type of asset is there for a football player to be? he's not a role model in any sense to anyone therefore he's not a moral asset i'm running out of ideas here, someones gonna need to help me out he's an asset to the treatment table, his own bank balance, to lurid newpaper headlines and of course his agent...beyond that he's a total and utter liability Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Last season though, he scored 7 goals in 27 games, which was better than Scholes, Giggs, Fabregas...I think given a more advanced role, he's definitely an asset to us, and in the right-side of the Big Sam front three, I can see him doing well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Last season though, he scored 7 goals in 27 games, which was better than Scholes, Giggs, Fabregas...I think given a more advanced role, he's definitely an asset to us, and in the right-side of the Big Sam front three, I can see him doing well. oh dear lord, you've just put him in the same sentence as Scholes, Giggs and Fabregas... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest samtoonarmy Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 It looks like Kieron Dyer will stat at NUFC. Big Sam has come out and said that the reports are not true about him leaving St. James'. http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=474601&CPID=8&clid=4&lid=&title=BIG+SAM+RULES+OUT+DYER+EXIT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 If Sam gets the best out of him then it won't be so bad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest eyeball_tickler Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 another shocking choice for a players picture on the sky sports website. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Last season though, he scored 7 goals in 27 games, which was better than Scholes, Giggs, Fabregas...I think given a more advanced role, he's definitely an asset to us, and in the right-side of the Big Sam front three, I can see him doing well. oh dear lord, you've just put him in the same sentence as Scholes, Giggs and Fabregas... Well considering everybody seems to be hammering him for his lack of goals, it's only fair he gets a bit of a defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ridzuan Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Dyer leaving? I hope not.I think he still has a bright future especially under the guidance of Big Sam,Im sure he will be even better next season,that if he doesnt get injured again.If he does leave indeed,Spurs would be the last club that I want him to join. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jamesmartinsmith Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 http://home.skysports.com/list.aspx?hlid=474601&CPID=8&clid=4&lid=2&title=Big+Sam+rules+out+Dyer+exit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoU Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Well, if Dyer got rid of his injury problems, became more motivated and began playing regularly (all things which could happen) the season 2007-08 could be his renascence. And he would then be an asset to the club. A lot of if's, but my main argument for giving him the chance to succeed at Newcastle would be that I'd hate for him to succeed anywhere else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenton Magpie Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Good super sub at best Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The horrible spineless little cunt has been afforded more comebacks than Frank fucking Sinatra. I hope the cunt never plays in a black and white shirt ever again. And anyone trying to defend the scrawny bastard seriously needs to have their fucking thick heads examined. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The horrible spineless little cunt has been afforded more comebacks than Frank fucking Sinatra. I hope the cunt never plays in a black and white shirt ever again. And anyone trying to defend the fucker seriously needs to have their fucking thick heads examined. blueyes.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The horrible spineless little c*** has been afforded more comebacks than Frank f****** Sinatra. I hope the c*** never plays in a black and white shirt ever again. And anyone trying to defend the scrawny b****** seriously needs to have their f****** thick heads examined. that was unexpected Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jamesmartinsmith Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 And Unjustified. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keefaz Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Is it wrong that I agree with Crumpy? It's makes me feel dirty to do so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Is it wrong that I agree with Crumpy? It's makes me feel dirty to do so. Not at all. He speaks the truth. Dyer is a waste of oxygen. And £80,000 a week. He costs us £11,430 A DAY. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest khyberpass Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Last season though, he scored 7 goals in 27 games, which was better than Scholes, Giggs, Fabregas...I think given a more advanced role, he's definitely an asset to us, and in the right-side of the Big Sam front three, I can see him doing well. oh dear lord, you've just put him in the same sentence as Scholes, Giggs and Fabregas... Well considering everybody seems to be hammering him for his lack of goals, it's only fair he gets a bit of a defence. Got no time for the fella...have a real concern that he is a part of our dressing room issues...often looks like he had a heart transplant, and they forgot to put the other fcuker in...BUT Opt Nut is right in quoting his 7 goals...he is, along with Barton and (potentially) Milner, our best goalscoring Midfielder..goals are what we were shit at last season....a full season should see him into double figures.... People talk about getting rid of Martins - top striker for us; and Dyer - top scoring midfielder for us...we're not that good yet... PLUS - if he starts playing the cnut, i'd love to see Sam lay the nut on him! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 The horrible spineless little c*** has been afforded more comebacks than Frank f****** Sinatra. I hope the c*** never plays in a black and white shirt ever again. And anyone trying to defend the scrawny b****** seriously needs to have their f****** thick heads examined. Sadly this is typical of the Anti-Dyer lobby. Foam-flecked hatred which makes you wonder whether they can't present reasonable arguments for their case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Is it wrong that I agree with Crumpy? It's makes me feel dirty to do so. Not at all. He speaks the truth. Dyer is a waste of oxygen. And £80,000 a week. He costs us £11,430 A DAY. What are you? A mathematician? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jamesmartinsmith Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Dyer turned our season around when he returned. No-one can deny that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 The horrible spineless little c*** has been afforded more comebacks than Frank f****** Sinatra. I hope the c*** never plays in a black and white shirt ever again. And anyone trying to defend the scrawny b****** seriously needs to have their f****** thick heads examined. Sadly this is typical of the Anti-Dyer lobby. Foam-flecked hatred which makes you wonder whether they can't present reasonable arguments for their case. arguments have been put, they've just been ignored 'cause you can't read them in rose tinted spectacles again though; his shooting is appalling, his crossing is appalling, his passing is appalling, his tackling is appalling, his positional sense is non-existent, his dribbling is only OK but is largely directionless, he has no isea how to utilise his pace in a game of professional football, he can't even spell "football brain", HE REFUSED TO PLAY FOR THE CLUB & BOBBY ROBSON that's it summed up in a nutshell and i haven't even mentioned his off the field exploits, numerous chances to turn it around, injury record, fighting on the pitch and so on....oh yes i have so there you have it friend, foam-flecked indeed but in no way untrue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Dyer turned our season around when he returned. No-one can deny that. our season was utter pish from start to finish so how exactly did it "turn around"? i'd like to see more views on dyers effect on the season however; my recollection was he had an impact when he returned from injury for about 5 games then disappeared as per usual martins was the one who "turned our season around" in my opinion but he's shite apparently and not worth more than one season... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NSG Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Is it wrong that I agree with Crumpy? It's makes me feel dirty to do so. Not at all. He speaks the truth. Dyer is a waste of oxygen. And £80,000 a week. He costs us £11,430 A DAY. What are you? A mathematician? £80,000 a week = £7.94 a minute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now