Guest DavB93 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Time will tell....Barton could be Wormwood Scrubs' star player sometime soon and Geremi has been a mere occasional player for ages so thats what part of my opinion is based on. Geremi has been an occasional player because of the situation at Chelsea, when he's played he's looked quality. As for Barton think you wrong also, nowt is going to happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DavB93 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS It's not a waste, think Smith will prove alot of the people on this board wrong. He's not been bought as a striker as I can see it. We've got addition money for defenders (don't believe this 10 million thing at all... ) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS Gemmill's going to start the body count soon, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simmsy10 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 I think this guy would have been pretty useful for us! Young CB with bags of potential http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_2636734,00.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Now we've had assurances that we're still going for 3/4 on top of Dyer's 'replacement' (Smith), i'm quite happy to add him to the squad as competition and good cover tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 I think it's fairly clear that the reason we're signing Smith is because BSA wants us to have a squad, with a number of options, rather than just a good first team. Smith can play wide right, which he did for Leeds on a number of occasions, as a battling midfielder and as a striker. He's obviously not being bought instead of defenders. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DavB93 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 I think this guy would have been pretty useful for us! Young CB with bags of potential http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_2636734,00.html Sam's already said he wants old players with experience. We've got Taylor and Huntington Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Taylor Barton Milner Butt Owen Smith? 6 of our starting 11 will be English Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 I think this guy would have been pretty useful for us! Young CB with bags of potential http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_2636734,00.html Have you seen him play? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Still think he's making a personal mistake coming here btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sharath Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Sky Sports News understands Newcastle United are holding talks with Manchester United striker Alan Smith. The former Leeds United striker has fallen down the pecking order under Sir Alex Ferguson and is keen to secure first-team football. Middlesbrough were thought to be leading the chase for the England international, but The Magpies have now moved to the head of the queue. Sam Allardyce is keen to bolster his squad and is set to bolster his transfer kitty after agreeing a fee with West Ham for pacey winger Kieron Dyer. The 26-year-old striker made just nine Premier League appearances for The Red Devils last term after recovering from the broken leg suffered against Liverpool. The move could see Smith renew his partnership with Mark Viduka, whom he played alongside during their days at Elland Road. looks like all media catching on this now. thanks for 6m newcastle. 6m for smith, 5.5m for richardson, 6.8m for heinze. great. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Is he been announced today or are the talks ongoing? and yes i have read the thread title. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Wouldn't be at all disappointed if this hit a snag or WHU came in for him and he chose them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS Gemmill's going to start the body count soon, like. I like how he even put DEFENDERS in capitals at the end. I went through it all last night, but for those that weren't listening: Allardyce has identified the targets he needs to get in for the defence, and he has the money to purchase them. With the sale of Dyer he feels he is now a player short in that area, so uses those funds to replace him. There has been no change to his targets for defenders, because the ones he's identified are still the ones he wants, and there is therefore no reason for him to suddenly think "Wow I've got some extra money. I'll buy some defenders I didn't previously think I needed." That's the last time I'm giving this talk. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS Gemmill's going to start the body count soon, like. I like how he even put DEFENDERS in capitals at the end. I went through it all last night, but for those that weren't listening: Allardyce has identified the targets he needs to get in for the defence, and he has the money to purchase them. With the sale of Dyer he feels he is now a player short in that area, so uses those funds to replace him. There has been no change to his targets for defenders, because the ones he's identified are still the ones he wants, and there is therefore no reason for him to suddenly think "Wow I've got some extra money. I'll buy some defenders I didn't previously think I needed." That's the last time I'm giving this talk. And people better listen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS Gemmill's going to start the body count soon, like. I like how he even put DEFENDERS in capitals at the end. I went through it all last night, but for those that weren't listening: Allardyce has identified the targets he needs to get in for the defence, and he has the money to purchase them. With the sale of Dyer he feels he is now a player short in that area, so uses those funds to replace him. There has been no change to his targets for defenders, because the ones he's identified are still the ones he wants, and there is therefore no reason for him to suddenly think "Wow I've got some extra money. I'll buy some defenders I didn't previously think I needed." That's the last time I'm giving this talk. Still a shit replacement for Dyer. Must be better about than Alan Smith, specially for 6m ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Providing we get the others we've always needed anyway, we can't lose with this transfer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS Gemmill's going to start the body count soon, like. I like how he even put DEFENDERS in capitals at the end. I went through it all last night, but for those that weren't listening: Allardyce has identified the targets he needs to get in for the defence, and he has the money to purchase them. With the sale of Dyer he feels he is now a player short in that area, so uses those funds to replace him. There has been no change to his targets for defenders, because the ones he's identified are still the ones he wants, and there is therefore no reason for him to suddenly think "Wow I've got some extra money. I'll buy some defenders I didn't previously think I needed." That's the last time I'm giving this talk. Sorry what? You lost me at "I Like" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Newbie Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Providing we get the others we've always needed anyway, we can't lose with this transfer. Agreed. I imagine Big Sam has him lined up to play the Kevin Davies role, plus he has the versatility to play in a number of different positions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gray Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Why waste the £6m on just Smith than spend it on some defenders? We already have good strikers in Owen, Martins, Viduka, Carrol and Ameobi so why do we need Smith? The only thing I can think of is becasue he is a replacement for Dyer even though they are both totally different players. DEFENDERS Gemmill's going to start the body count soon, like. I like how he even put DEFENDERS in capitals at the end. I went through it all last night, but for those that weren't listening: Allardyce has identified the targets he needs to get in for the defence, and he has the money to purchase them. With the sale of Dyer he feels he is now a player short in that area, so uses those funds to replace him. There has been no change to his targets for defenders, because the ones he's identified are still the ones he wants, and there is therefore no reason for him to suddenly think "Wow I've got some extra money. I'll buy some defenders I didn't previously think I needed." That's the last time I'm giving this talk. Still a s*** replacement for Dyer. Must be better about than Alan Smith, specially for 6m ffs. this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Taylor Barton Milner Butt Owen Smith? 6 of our starting 11 will be English Butt will not start. I am unsure about Smith. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 But shouldn't we be concentrating on buying defenders! Psyche! Just joshin. Cant say Im really that pleased that were going for smith. I actually liked what I saw of him playing in that advanced midfield role last season but my Man U supporting mate reckons he's a Match of the Day highlights player. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and remain impartial until we see him playing but I'd rather we'd have went for/succeeded in getting either SWP or Gudjohnsen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 At least we'll have cover for Barton while he's out. I think Smith will do quite well as an attacking midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Verlaine Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 But shouldn't we be concentrating on buying defenders! Psyche! Just joshin. Cant say Im really that pleased that were going for smith. I actually liked what I saw of him playing in that advanced midfield role last season but my Man U supporting mate reckons he's a Match of the Day highlights player. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and remain impartial until we see him playing but I'd rather we'd have went for/succeeded in getting either SWP or Gudjohnsen. Both of whom to an extent could be accused of being MotD highlight players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted August 2, 2007 Share Posted August 2, 2007 Sky Sports News understands Newcastle United are holding talks with Manchester United striker Alan Smith. The former Leeds United striker has fallen down the pecking order under Sir Alex Ferguson and is keen to secure first-team football. Middlesbrough were thought to be leading the chase for the England international, but The Magpies have now moved to the head of the queue. Sam Allardyce is keen to bolster his squad and is set to bolster his transfer kitty after agreeing a fee with West Ham for pacey winger Kieron Dyer. The 26-year-old striker made just nine Premier League appearances for The Red Devils last term after recovering from the broken leg suffered against Liverpool. The move could see Smith renew his partnership with Mark Viduka, whom he played alongside during their days at Elland Road. looks like all media catching on this now. thanks for 6m newcastle. 6m for smith, 5.5m for richardson, 6.8m for heinze. great. What I always love about you lot is that you think your players are great while you've got them, then shit when they look to leave. Up until about 3 weeks ago Heinze was one of the most popular players at Old Trafford, now all of a sudden, its like you've always hated him, and can't wait to see the back of him. Not that I'm stereotyping Man Utd fans of course............. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now