Jump to content

Dokko

Member
  • Posts

    70,617
  • Joined

Everything posted by Dokko

  1. Dokko

    Jose Mourinho

    Ashley want attacking football and someone he can trust to spend his money to achieve that and sucess. Jose really doesn't fit that bill imo, not after his days at Chelsea. A great maanger but maybe not attacking enough and wasted for too much money. Someone just said in another thread that it wont be McGing simply because the arse lost Ashley millions, well its probably true. Uf we cannot have Jose, but can keep away from that clown then something in the middle would be ok i suppose, we've just lost our worst and best options.
  2. What a lot were saying for weeks, HTT just caught up a few days ago.
  3. Oh well at least the Tottenham fans keep posting utter shit, the world hasn't spun off its axis.
  4. Dokko

    When ?

    next week at the latest, unless the board has mesed up and lost their man.
  5. Dokko

    Jose Mourinho

    Chances are if he has clauses they'll be different for each team or standard of team. £25m to manage Liverpool or CL or 5p for a club like us.
  6. Dokko

    Jose Mourinho

    ...one other straw is that a 'big name' would have wanted to deal in the Jan window and Ashely would have pre-ok'd funds. Another straw, well two, is that Jose was a big fan of Diarra, maybe the board was pushing that one even though Sam thought it was his, but this appropriate channels thing, everyone has assumed it means someone in a job, what if it means sorting out compensation instead? Oh god, i like this game.
  7. Dokko

    Jose Mourinho

    At least he can put his £100k+ massive coats to good use.
  8. Dokko

    Jose Mourinho

    It couldn't happen could it? No, surely not, not us, were destined never to be anything meaningful, Ashley or not, it just wont happen. Or could it? It would be a life changing moment for us all if it did imo, it would mean being a player within a very short time, Jose wouldn't have it any other way. Wishful thinking but he's the best available manager out there, it just doesn't happen, fair tales, dreams, its just not us.
  9. Link? So I can change it. 30,000 perfect post record in jeopardy, don't tell him!
  10. I don't believe in when a bet gets suspended it means its nailed on, however this time i'm open to the suggestion.
  11. Dokko

    Jose Mourinho

    He's just forgot man.
  12. Sell them, was speaking to manu fans before who MISS Smith! We can get rid of them without too much financial deficit, new manager, new ideas, can move players around without suspecting clubs finding out that they are just actually shite.
  13. Hope? Fuking understatement.
  14. He even knew it would end in misery when we signed Owen the cunt.
  15. What shite, deserves to be sacked again.
  16. Potential I suppose. Don't think even that would get him off his arse for an interview tbh. Cushy number, loved by all, good funds, good form, new stadium on its way, backed 100% throughout the club and lastly and very much the be all, he's at home. He sees himself as an old guy settled in his area with his family and likes it there. He's said this a few times, i doubt he'd go any further North than London, and that would only be for the England job.
  17. Dokko

    British or Foreign

    Can't think of a genuine reason why anyone who supports the club would want a British manager.
  18. Hopes raised slightly at the forgotten man. I wouldn't be against it. Gamble, but yes, good manager.
  19. Apparently it's going to be converted into a museum showing how football was played in the stone-age. Even though you are quite cleary a smug twat, i found that rather funny.
  20. That would be horrific. Probably about right and why its mutual. I've no problem with that either. Back him or sack him, been saying it for a few weeks now, he needed help, and with previous spending and a broken connection with the fans it was always going to be hard to back him. I read that completely wrong, as though they weren't willing to spend at all. Thats the way i'm reading it as well, only i don't see a problem with it. The man has failed, he's brought in 9 players who as a collective have played under par and failed. His tactics have failed, and he's failed to win over the crowd, its all bad for business. If they chuck money at the situation then they are just as bad as FS, doing the same shit, instead they've brought in some future potential, and told SA he's not get anything because of his position, he needs to prove himself first. How is that a bad thing? If he didn't like it and threatened to walk then he's been found out, they've said fine, lets negotiate a settlement. Sam only has himself to blame, he's been poor this season, made some disgraceful decisions while the majority of the fan are left totally frustrated because they know if he'd of just done the basics right we'd be on target and looking forward to the future. They weren't ready to back failure, again, i've got no problem with that. Sam Allardyce failed, failed to do the simplest of tasks right, and how on earth does he expect to get the bigger picture sorted out when he cant even see past his nose? Something was wrong, its gone, if the board forced his hand fair enough i say. I've got no problem with this. In fact if this IS the reason, and we will soon find out if it is, then it will put to rest the reservations I've had about them. I only hope they get a replacement who turns out to be a success. Its got to be, if not we've been lied too, Ashley like Sam will be another false dawn if this departure is for a sidestep British manager.
  21. That would be horrific. Probably about right and why its mutual. I've no problem with that either. Back him or sack him, been saying it for a few weeks now, he needed help, and with previous spending and a broken connection with the fans it was always going to be hard to back him. I read that completely wrong, as though they weren't willing to spend at all. Thats the way i'm reading it as well, only i don't see a problem with it. The man has failed, he's brought in 9 players who as a collective have played under par and failed. His tactics have failed, and he's failed to win over the crowd, its all bad for business. If they chuck money at the situation then they are just as bad as FS, doing the same shit, instead they've brought in some future potential, and told SA he's not get anything because of his position, he needs to prove himself first. How is that a bad thing? If he didn't like it and threatened to walk then he's been found out, they've said fine, lets negotiate a settlement. Sam only has himself to blame, he's been poor this season, made some disgraceful decisions while the majority of the fan are left totally frustrated because they know if he'd of just done the basics right we'd be on target and looking forward to the future. They weren't ready to back failure, again, i've got no problem with that. Sam Allardyce failed, failed to do the simplest of tasks right, and how on earth does he expect to get the bigger picture sorted out when he cant even see past his nose? Something was wrong, its gone, if the board forced his hand fair enough i say. At all, as in for any manager. I thought NE5 was carrying on with his 'lack of ambition' thing. Thing is we finally find out the new boards ambition, we find out where they want to take us with this next appointment. The only British thing is scarily familiar, and too narrow minded to be true. Wires crossed, unreliable source, god knows, i'm living in hope thats the case, if not that were really going nowhere, and we might as well of kept a hold of Sam.
  22. That would be horrific. Probably about right and why its mutual. I've no problem with that either. Back him or sack him, been saying it for a few weeks now, he needed help, and with previous spending and a broken connection with the fans it was always going to be hard to back him. I read that completely wrong, as though they weren't willing to spend at all. Thats the way i'm reading it as well, only i don't see a problem with it. The man has failed, he's brought in 9 players who as a collective have played under par and failed. His tactics have failed, and he's failed to win over the crowd, its all bad for business. If they chuck money at the situation then they are just as bad as FS, doing the same shit, instead they've brought in some future potential, and told SA he's not get anything because of his position, he needs to prove himself first. How is that a bad thing? If he didn't like it and threatened to walk then he's been found out, they've said fine, lets negotiate a settlement. Sam only has himself to blame, he's been poor this season, made some disgraceful decisions while the majority of the fan are left totally frustrated because they know if he'd of just done the basics right we'd be on target and looking forward to the future. They weren't ready to back failure, again, i've got no problem with that. Sam Allardyce failed, failed to do the simplest of tasks right, and how on earth does he expect to get the bigger picture sorted out when he cant even see past his nose? Something was wrong, its gone, if the board forced his hand fair enough i say.
×
×
  • Create New...