Northern Monkey

Yeah, and some morons used to still think Souness should stay, just like some do now.

 

It doesn't matter what people on here want, only one moron has any say on him going or staying, unless the Halls show an interest.

As soon as the fans turn on the fatman, the manager is gone.

Assuming Sam Allardyce is indeed appointed as our new manager ...

7. If Sam Allardyce turns out to be a success, will you gloat that you have always wanted him to be our manager?

 

No, I have always prefered someone else (Le Guen, Hughes, Keane, Boothroyd, Lippi, Sachi) to Allardyce. Allardyce would be a decent choice I am more than happy with with but I still won't take the credit for "recommending" him.

 

 

Jesus.

Yeah, and some morons used to still think Souness should stay, just like some do now.

Of course he'd need some time.

 

It took Robson a few seasons to get us sorted, weeding out shite and getting on top of the wage bill. We put up with it because we knew he had a pedigree and we trusted he had a plan.

 

Allardyce's pedigree is not so illustrious, but if we're buying him it's because he's proven himself over a long period at a club with scant resources. There'd be fuck all point in appointing him if we were demanding instant success.

 

If does get the job, the best thing he can do at the outset would be to make a kind of Churchillian, "I can offer you nothing but blood, sweat, toil and tears" speech, just so everyone understand it would be a grind before it got better.

 

There are no instant solutions to a club in our position.

My point is that tactically and team-selection wise, he could not be as fucking incompetent and damaging as Roeder, so we would automatically improve.

Not saying he's going to be the immediate solution, but automatically we'd get better through not having that wanker in charge.

 

owt.

 

Sorry

 

Sorted.

Thank you, it was niggling.

 

 

Would you like me to post those league positions for the 30 years pre-1992 ? Or are you going to say I have made them up ?

 

 

 

You're itching to post them aren't you, you've threatened to do it twice this week, sad as out. 

owt.

Sorry

46 people want NUFC to lose - ok then u sit down when an NUFC goal goes in then u stupid pricks - you're not real supporters ur just clueless wankers

 

You're a laugh a minute, sorry, ur a laf a minit.

 

 

OMG!!111 etc...

tbh. imho.

If they have the nerve to do a lap of "honour" (honour?? hahahahahahaha), then they absolutelty deserve to be booed like the shite bunch of twats they are.

We're s**** and will get beat. Heap the pressure on Shepherd.

 

A few of my mates were talking about turning away from the pitch at kick off.

 

Your mates clueless tossers like you Mick?  

Glass houses?

Something everyone seems to forget about Allardyce is that it took him two seasons before he got Bolton established in the Premiership and could build on it. Would he really get 1-2 seasons at Tyneside before he starts getting results?

 

 

Difference there was that Bolton had a pretty shit team with no money.

 

We've got a good team with good players and money to spend.

Wrong and wrong.

You know exactly what is going to happen when Luque moves elsewhere, don't you?

 

Prolific. It is writ in the stars.

I suspect not, but as long as he's fucked off from here, i don't care.

He did Souness. And the domestic situation was just as dreary, if not worse before that particular summer.

 

Not after he's sussed him. He got rid.

 

He only sussed him when three players collided. 

Bugger, thats not going to happen now. They just stand there now, watching oppositiion players run past them, while drooling slightly and rocking gently back and forwards.

...based on what he's done here, under two awful managers, and after suffering a terrible injury just weeks after his transfer. He'll do well for them.

 

Yeah, none of it is due to him not being very good at football.

yea, man.. tell me who plays good under Roeder

 

Tell me when he's played well for us under anyone.

 

Nobody is trying to argue he has played well for us, it's the fact you deny he's ever been a good footballer that is funny.

No, i deny he has ever been for US. I don't pretend to have watched 'every foreign game ever honest'. I've watched him play for US, and he's been shite for us, consistently. Not bacause of anyone elses fault, but because HE failed to show any individual ability on the few occasions he managed to waddle over and get the ball.

He's been shite for us, and i hope he fucks off and never comes back.

...based on what he's done here, under two awful managers, and after suffering a terrible injury just weeks after his transfer. He'll do well for them.

 

Yeah, none of it is due to him not being very good at football.

yea, man.. tell me who plays good under Roeder

Tell me when he's played well for us under anyone.

I've been really impressed by George Macartney over the last few months playing left back for West Ham (Puts tin hat on).

 

In terms of improving our squad, we could do worse than him, Volz (even though he had a shocker for Fulham last weekend against the Arse) and Hoyte.

 

Sign that lot and sign one superstar defender and still get change out of £11m I reckon.

 

Substantial improvement on Carr/Baba and Co and those lada are far more likely to actually want to play for us rather than pick their games and they'd be wages of less than £15k per week.

We don't need to improve our SQUAD yet - our FIRST TEAM needs players first.

...based on what he's done here, under two awful managers, and after suffering a terrible injury just weeks after his transfer. He'll do well for them.

 

Yeah, none of it is due to him not being very good at football.

 

You're clueless if you think Luque's performances in a black and white shirt are an accurate reflection of his ability.

Erm, i've seen every game he's been involved in for us, i think, and he's been rank.

But you expect us to believe that he's a good player??

Let me guess: its the fault of injuries/managers/colleagues/fans/media/ley lines/the Reformation......

What a load of balls.

Hyypia would be a mistake imo

 

A mistake for Hyypia you mean!

 

JOKE honest!

 

It wouldn't be a mistake at all. He'd be a hugely calming influence for Newcastle. He's played well this season when called upon, and he had a very good season last year. He's still an excellent defender, and well suited to the prem and the bombardment into the peno box that accomapnies it!

 

Doesn't matter about his age or pace, he's always been slow.  He ain't done so badly for himself without that pace.

Some of our fans (wrongly) think Shambles is blessed with great pace.

A slow, good defender, or Shambles? Christ, i'd pay the stupid fat useless monkeys metro fare to the airport myself.

...based on what he's done here, under two awful managers, and after suffering a terrible injury just weeks after his transfer. He'll do well for them.

Yeah, none of it is due to him not being very good at football.

Like may Dutch forwards/wingers he is wildly overated mainly cause he scored a hatful of goals in a weak league. We will see, but I think Martins will score more (Owen you can bet your house on it) than Kalou or Kuyt next year. Kuyt overall game is better than Martins but he has no 'X' factor.

Martins has often scored when we were getting pummeled for posession and had no control of matches. I don't think he will ever have a first touch or develop the awareness of Anelka, but he will get his share of goals.

 

It is different though. Kezman is basically a poacher with a slight physique, whereas Kuyt, like Kalou, is an all rounder. It isn't surprising Huntelaar is yet to be bought by an European giant as he is similar Kezman, with his limitness rending him more highly floppable in foreign leagues.

 

Kalou, like Marins, is bought with future in mind. I wouldn't them mind not scoring tonnes of goals immediately, as long as they show potential and promise. Kuyt is bought to deliver immediate results, and I definitely won't say that he hasn't.

I agree Martins has shown promise. Thing is, teams like us don't spend THAT much money on a player "for the future" - not when you only have one actual striker at the club, and he's crocked.

Would like Landon Donovan here. Still young, an attacking midfielder/centre foward. Rob Lee-ish

 

ahhhhh hahahahahaha you must be on crack...or didn't watch a bit of the world cup. i live in the US..the only place that whinny cunt can survive and score a goal or two

The only place?? You clearly haven't seen much scottish football.

Phil Brown as Assistant? Least gives Shepherd the excuse to hire at least one Geordie.

 

Try getting him away from Humberside now. He's probably got freedom of the city.

Urgh. I'd be wanting to had that back.....

It's one of those things that I'll only discover once the game starts. The voices in my head will then take over.

 

I'm not sure that anything's been decided, but realistically, defeat in the next two games would increase the pressure on Shepherd to replace Roeder and hopefully take himself off as well. It'll increase the determination of the Halls to sell up or at least push through other changes.

No title, just a big steaming turd on the front.

 

Do you think we could find a big enough picture of Albert Luque?

Not one from a game where he played well in. Unless you can capture a still off the internet from his pre-Toon "highlights" compilation......

http://www.ave-it.net/astonvillakit.jpg

 

 

 

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah get it away, get it away!!

What, the strip or the duvet cover??

Blatently wants to join us.

 

'Come & get me Roeder' if I ever saw one.

Always been a Toon fan, it's on the internet.