Kasper

Why wouldn't he. They were there for the taking today. Chelsea was rubbish and we should have won that.

That was coming. We look so tired. We haven't kept the ball at all and have been running after them for 90 mins.

Putting more than two passes together in a row would be a start.

If we don't get back to playing football now we're fucked.

Obertan. Fuck. FUCK.

Wouldn't read that much into it. It would have been Anita & Colback if Colback was fit.

Seems like the long awaited Anita-Gini midfield is finally here.

http://i.imgur.com/Q9jr6LU.jpg

On that flank that we havent really passed the ball to once.

They'll probably put us under a lot of pressure from the start. With their fullbacks pushing up a lot it should leave chances on the counter if we have courage to turn with the ball and find some space. But if we turn to hoofing it forward to Cisse in the first 20 minutes I think they'll break us pretty quickly. If it's 0-0 after that 15-25 minutes its there for the taking.

Un fucking real. Every week my captain has got 4 points. Now Aguero gets injured and scores me 2.

Glad I didnt swap Sanchez for Pedro. Don't know what I was thinking. Sanchez hattrick please.

This thread always makes me feel better about my FPL week.

Good news

Am I missing something here?

You can always buy players approaching 30 if you pay enough. Sunderland did that with a couple of ex-Man U defenders. They bought a great player and will get to enjoy him at least for a year. You think the fans will worry about the price they will get for him in the future? Not every club buys players just to sell them on for a profit. Some actually try to improve their team. Weird I know.

Haha #panic

Could've guessed it. The week I finally get in on the Mahrez train he gets injured and scores 1 point. Still 50 points, not bad.

Clear penalty. Thauvin stood on the back of his foot following a run into the box. I didn't think it was that clear tbh, easily given I guess but no intent. Since when are penalties given based on intent? Well normally the offending player is trying to actually do something. You try to kick the ball but the opponent moves the ball away and you kick him. Intent? Intent to clear the ball, yes. Well then you can just as well say that in this situation his intent was to run But that's my point, I don't think he was guilty of anything other than inadvertently planting his foot in the same spot as the Arsenal player. Can't be arsed arguing about it like, as I said it could have easily been given but I can understand the ref thinking it was just an accident. I don't think you understood my point. If you accidentally kick a player when trying to clear the ball its a foul. If you accidentally run on someone's ankle, its a foul.

Clear penalty. Thauvin stood on the back of his foot following a run into the box. I didn't think it was that clear tbh, easily given I guess but no intent. Since when are penalties given based on intent? Well normally the offending player is trying to actually do something. You try to kick the ball but the opponent moves the ball away and you kick him. Intent? Intent to clear the ball, yes. Well then you can just as well say that in this situation his intent was to run

Clear penalty. Thauvin stood on the back of his foot following a run into the box. I didn't think it was that clear tbh, easily given I guess but no intent. Since when are penalties given based on intent? Well normally the offending player is trying to actually do something. You try to kick the ball but the opponent moves the ball away and you kick him. Intent?

Clear penalty. Thauvin stood on the back of his foot following a run into the box. I didn't think it was that clear tbh, easily given I guess but no intent. Since when are penalties given based on intent?

Fuck if I'm wasting my pizza watching this. Narcos on.

Take a guess.

Thank you & goodbye