gazza ladra

Bob Bradley!

and Schär

There were many non-NUFC pundits and fans who reckon we paid too much* for Tonali. (I think that opinion had some traction.) * Same clowns that said we paid too much for Isak.

He brings out the best in Bruno, who brings out the best in Isak.

Would it be too much to ask that the interviewer say to Arteta "yes, but you had 2 shots on goal"? Or to Postog "yes, but you had 4 shots on goal"?

Get in!!!!'

!!!!!

Bought Chris Wood from Burnley to ensure their relegation. Sold Wood to Forest to miss out on the Champions League.

I agree with this, but Villa are better than either. Better players, better manager.

If anyone is going to buy in January, you'd think it'll be City.

Spurs looked the real deal when Postecoglou first arrived. Was found out second half of last season and it's continued. Wonder if something similiar is happening with Chelsea.

get in!

Used to be the rule.

Chelsea.

In the US broadcast, last years' difficulties were put down to having CL football and inexperience. No mention of injuries.

Hate rooting for Palace.

Palace looking like Spurs at the moment. Lot of running around in Chelsea's half, producing nothing at all.

Sure, they feel that way. As they did in the loss at St. James', but they didn't hit the target for all their possession. We had better chances and capitalized on their mistakes. We won the game.

If you don't shoot on target, you don't deserve shit.

FFS

Even if possible, how long would it take him to get Eddie fit?

There will be sveral more misses.

Kinnear erasure.

So, we 'll be missing Bruno and Schär. And they're missing Saka and Sterling?

That's Brereton Diaz-level shithousery. I think there was more commentary on Schär and the "dark arts" than on Rogers' simulation. "Oh, look Schär's holding onto his shirt behind his back. Out of sight of the referee. Very clever..." Edit: see that Skeletor beat me out on bringing up that Southampton bastard. (Schär must drive opponents out of their minds.)