SEMTEX

TCD gets the dog's abuse, but mozy is on that level. Compared to the forum whipping boy, ouch. I won't ask you to apologise, boil your head, or whatever else is the norm though. Sissoko has one redeeming skill and he's bang average at anything else. Wijnaldum is a much better footballer and should take his spot in the team. That's all there is to it. Apart from he's never played a game for us, nor ever played in the Premier League. He could end up being absolute gash, he wouldn't be the first. I've seen him play live a couple of times and he looked class then (few years ago mind but if anything he should have improved). There's always the chance he could fail to adapt but that's the risk you take. I imagine Sissoko probably looked class a few times for Toulouse. It's the risk you take, should you choose to sell him, yes. But then you could just not sell him, have competition, if Sissoko continues to be shit, sell him for £15m in a year or something. Fees are not going down anytime soon.

Or we could just spend the shit ton of money we already have and not sell anyone? And actually have a squad?

He's more valuable because of it, you nonce. Behave yourself, you wouldn't say that to my face. I wasn't directly referring to you. I've heard people talk about the quality of Anita based on him being a Dutch international. He has 3 caps ffs. Aye, that'd be canny relevant if we were in the Vurnon Anita thread, you nonce.

25m?! Wow, literally nobody would pay anywhere near that. That's the point...... I would also be very surprised if anyone would pay £25m for him right now.

I think he can get a bit of a pass on being disinterested as well TBH, at least last season. The coaches may have been totally shite, but any player who is 'disinterested' should not get a pass imo. Not giving a monkey's may be a big part of the Ashley era, but anyone who goes along with it is as bad. Easier said than done when you're not going into work every day to be bossed around by John fucking Carver.

TCD gets the dog's abuse, but mozy is on that level. Compared to the forum whipping boy, ouch. I won't ask you to apologise, boil your head, or whatever else is the norm though. Sissoko has one redeeming skill and he's bang average at anything else. Wijnaldum is a much better footballer and should take his spot in the team. That's all there is to it. Apart from he's never played a game for us, nor ever played in the Premier League. He could end up being absolute gash, he wouldn't be the first.

He's more valuable because of it, you nonce.

He was shit in a shit team with a shit manager. He's played well at times for us and is a French International. I don't think he's ever going to be the world's greatest by a long way, and his uninterested manner grinds my gears, but there's no way I'd be selling him for short of £25m. It's 2015 peeps, everyone costs obscene amounts in the Premier League.

such as a one game contract, something like that? He'd have a fucking class game and then sign for Bayern, so nah. 8 yearer imo.

I love me some Abou Diaby. Great signing as long as it's a sensible contract.

I forgot the final for this was in Philly. My social medias and work email are lighting up with cut price final tickets.

Standard hipster gluten allergy http://i.imgur.com/CYcdM6M.jpg

Gluten free cherry bakewell ffs. Stab him.

hahahah totally forgot about this game 4-3? hahahhhhhhhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Wiki: In 1993, The Football Association switched to persistent squad numbers, abandoning the mandatory use of 1–11 for the starting line-up. The first league event to feature this was the 1993 Football League Cup Final between Arsenal and Sheffield Wednesday,[citation needed] and it became standard in the FA Premier League the following season, along with names printed above the numbers. Squad numbers became optional in the three divisions of the Football League at the same time, but only 10 out of 70 clubs utilized them. One of those clubs, Brighton & Hove Albion, issued 25 players with squad numbers but reverted to traditional 1-11 numbering halfway through the season.[12]In the Premier League, Arsenal temporarily reverted to the old system halfway through that same season, but reverted to the new numbering system for the following campaign. Most European top leagues adopted the system during the 1990s. The Football League made squad numbers compulsory for the 1999-2000 season, and the Football Conference followed suit for the 2002-03 season.

Players didn't have a specific number assigned for the season back then, they just wore 1-11. The fact that this is an actual question makes me feel very old.

Then yours is the world, and everything that's in it. And, which is more, you'll be a man my son. Young love <3 Can't be long before you're officially Interpolic W

be class if we get stuffed

That number was so preposterous I assumed he just missed the "half" in half-dozen.

Love a good adds-to-9 number me. Although my preference lies with 72. And if you can sneak in a sly plus sign, you're a legend.

You notice it plenty when the ball is rolling away from you down the fucking hill.

Cn'grt

Tiresome or not. I like it.