Jump to content

Tachikoma

Member
  • Posts

    3,290
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Tachikoma

  1. Supporting the toon is depressing business these days. Roeder out already ffs. Fucking hypocrite.
  2. Tachikoma

    Gooners away

    The thing I especially dislike about our 4-5-1 is that we get dominated in midfield anyway (by sheffield united at home, no less), even with 5 players "crowding it up". Roeder needs to learn his limits and stick to the basics, and nothing but the basics.
  3. Tachikoma

    Gooners away

    Not a chance that this formation will be employed against the gooners, but oh well: Given Solano Ramage Taylor Baba Parker Milner N'Zogbia Dyer Luque Martins
  4. Under Roeder we'll be lucky to escape administration.
  5. Unfortunately thats exactly whats going to happen in January with clueless mk2 in charge. Realistically I don't think we'll get Bridge, or Distin or Upson. Volz, maybe. From memory Aaron Hughes was a godsend compared to Carr
  6. Emre on the right and N'Zogbia at leftback, not to mention two defensive midfielders in the middle... If we're going to play a diamond-shaped midfield, I would play Dyer or N'Zogbia in an advanced role behind the strikers, Emre on the left and Solano on the right.
  7. Tachikoma

    Carr

    Solano did well at right back, didn't he?
  8. Aight, hypothetical situation: Now, your responses?
  9. http://thestar.com.my/sports/story.asp?file=/2006/11/10/sports/15976667&sec=sports Fluminese = us by christmas.
  10. Duff to start upfront again eh. :x
  11. So... did you expect players not to have feel anything when their name and "shite" become synonyms to their "supporters"? =P not that its undeserved for some of them. I rate Ramage though, I'll be looking out for that shearer salute
  12. Harper Taylor Ramage Moore Baba Butt Milner Duff Emre Rossi/Martins/Sibs Luque Subs: Given, Zoggy, Solano, Sibs/Martins, Bramble Duff to start ahead of Zoggy because it looks like we'll need some extra defensive cover down the left against trabelsi and richards. edit: rhetorical. :x
  13. Tachikoma

    Andy Johnson

    Dive or no dive, that was a foul.
  14. Better question, why do we care? Signing all of the galacticos in the world but not having any real success, and forcing the club to go into debt - thats what you wanted? Is that what you think the fans want? Again, WE DON'T CARE, will we win trophies by FS being better than Doug Ellis (even that is fairly subjective)? We should be comparing our board to the boards of the teams we are going to compete with. Despite Shepherd being able to "back his managers" with money, how much of that money has actually been spent by the managers? I believe we are fairly unique in the sense that we are the only club where half the signings have nowt to do with who the manager really wants.
  15. so does that somehow mean this guy's for real? http://www.newcastle-online.com/nufcforum/index.php/topic,31697.0.html
  16. Tachikoma

    Tim Krul !!!

    http://orthopedics.about.com/cs/kneeinjuries/g/lcoking.htm Meniscus tear: http://orthopedics.about.com/cs/meniscusinjuries1/a/meniscus.htm If it is a meniscus tear, krul will probably be out for 6 weeks at least.
  17. Is that really a problem? better than having two fat carrs on either flank.
  18. didn't we all suspect that Shola was reading our posts?
  19. Even if the Man United player was significantly better? Makes no sense tbh. Rossi is still a few years off from being "significantly better than everyone we have". Big him up as much as you like but he's hardly Louis Saha, is he? Yeah, I suggested he was significantly better than two of our reserve players, not "everyone we have". Nice try though. He'd have to be, for us to be desperate enough to want to have him on a four-month long loan.
  20. Even if the Man United player was significantly better? Makes no sense tbh. Rossi is still a few years off from being "significantly better than everyone we have". Big him up as much as you like but he's hardly Louis Saha, is he?
×
×
  • Create New...