Ronaldo

He's nippy off the mark, but there's no real pace about him, especially on the ball.

I honestly don't know what some folk watch. er.. Would you say Harper is better at dealing with crosses? Yes, without doubt.

As far as I can remember, only three people on here wrote him off when he signed.

Don't click on it then. That doesn't make it disappear.

I honestly don't know what some folk watch.

? I was drunk when I wrote the Charlie Adam lark. I don't think he's s*** but he is massively over-rated. Take him out of the Blackpool team and he's a rather chubby average player. Honestly, man.

Twas a pathetic finish.

Wish this thread would fuck off.

Good news.

Pretty sure that was Tiote.

Whickham's the type of player we'd have signed during Bobby's time, even without the Ipswich connection. Unlikely in 2010, though. Far too expensive.

It's better on page 1.

Not according to the photos.

If Lovenkrands scored with every touch he'd end up with almost 20 goals a season, nobody expects that.

The positives outweight the negatives. He's scored more goals in the last year than Jonas has in his entire career. He can cross, too.

Adam would only get into our side as a direct replacement for Nolan. This is basically what I wanted to happen in the summer.

Enrique is a very good defender, he can deal with a maverick/enigma in front on him. Olivier Bernard managed it, for crying out loud.

Taarabt is brilliant at picking the ball up deep and running at players. He'd be useful on either flank, imo.

You've missed the point. If we were to sign Taarabt, Jonas would be on the bench, playing with his pigtails.

Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist. Surely it'd be better to sign a left winger to play on the left wing if you want him out of the side so badly? Clearly, but the article links Taarabt.

Eh? Jonas, not Ash. Why would signing Taarabt mean the end of Jonas/him out of the side? Because i'm an optimist.

Eh? Jonas, not Ash.

See ya, Jonas.