Ronaldo

Possibly 1 player instead of 0. Quality.

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football. Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route. So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya. Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose? There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager. I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them. So do you have a different interpretation of correct and incorrect then? I'm assuming you do since you LOL'd at mine. As I made clear, it's ridiculously simplistic to use such words. Ironically it's the type of stuff I'd expect in an endorsement of scientific Allardyce-like approach. Bobby went back-to-front plenty during our 4th, 3rd, 5th seasons. Love to see you phrase that as incorrect. I did it ages ago, in fact I created a thread about how he transitioned from using Duncan Ferguson and Shearer to creating the CL side with Bellamy and Dyer. What's Duncan Ferguson got to do with finishing 4th, 3rd and 5th under Bobby? And Bobby didn't even sign Dyer.

Far better than their last one, that's for sure.

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football. Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route. So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya. Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose? There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager. I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them. So do you have a different interpretation of correct and incorrect then? I'm assuming you do since you LOL'd at mine. As I made clear, it's ridiculously simplistic to use such words. Ironically it's the type of stuff I'd expect in an endorsement of scientific Allardyce-like approach. Bobby went back-to-front plenty during our 4th, 3rd, 5th seasons. Love to see you phrase that as incorrect.

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football. Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route. So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya. Every PL boss is trying to do it, but it comes more naturally to some than others. So Brendan Rodgers has found it much easier to implement than his predecessor Dalglish for example. Ferguson found it more natural than David Fallaini Moyes. If you had a choice of Keegan or Pardew to implement the correct fashion of football who would you choose? There's that phrase again. There's no incorrect, or correct about it. Keegan's just a far more intelligent football man and a personality with far more balls and ambition, that's what makes him a better manager. I feel dirty even responding to a post comparing the two of them.

If he put his head up he'd see who he was about to pass to and just shoot anyway.

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football. Well the better teams do tend to pass it around more as opposed to going down the long ball route. So every PL boss except the 2 or 3 who predominantly like to hoof it are playing correct football. Got ya.

Titter ye not Ronaldo, don't make me bump the post where I predicted Rodgers would turn Liverpool around. Just like I correctly predicted Man U won't finish in a CL position this year More the fact you think there's a correct and incorrect way of playing football.

No I didn't, I said he looks a threat. He asserts himself well and attacks and strikes the ball well without looking like he has natural ability on it.

We aren't capable of great anymore. He's solid and the type of defender we need, that's all I've said. Nice double edit.

Ryan Shawcross is shite now. Sounds like someone might have an agenda.

I'll ignore the absurd Taylor comment, but nice try. I've already conceded more than once that Shawcross is out of our price range. I'm not even going to touch the fact that Stoke have shipped goals under Mark Hughes. Man City were conceding 3 at home to the likes of Burnley, Bolton and Sunderland with that idiot in charge.

Petty as fuck, that. And about as relevant as Shawcross getting 'merked' by a great striker in one game.

We've got CBs who've been merked by far worse, like.

Anything but admit they should've gone with Mourinho huh? Man U? They should've appointed Ancelotti or Guardiola. Mourinho would never have worked at Man U. Chelsea are an excuse for a football club who've been blessed with infinite money and great players. They're a perfect fit for Mourinho.

Wasn't that "Keegan side" badly depleted that day? Checked to satisfy my curiosity: Harper; Beye, Taylor, Faye, Enrique; Smith, Butt, N'Zogbia; Owen, Duff, Carroll. Forster, Cacapa, Ramage, Tozer and Lua Lua on the bench. I make that just the 5 first team players missing from his favoured selection during that run, but carry on. I just think it's bloody rich that posters are lining up to crucify him as a manager despite the fact that he'd be absolutely worshipped on here if he'd been our manager for 11 years instead of Everton's. Posters who think Chris Hughton's a top manager. He's having a poor season with a squad who've been on the way down for a while.

Don't remember Moyes being called negative or shit on here after the times he took his Everton side to SJP and deservedly won. Or when he took Keegan's side to the cleaners with Anichebe and Yakubu up front. Ferguson was an absolute miracle worker, I said it umpteen times during his reign.

Nile Ripper? Doesn't even make sense.

Without Remy we'd have lost.

Think how many rubbish French players we could've bought with that.

6 weeks too late, like.

He's exactly what we need to partner MYM. You can guarantee we'll get someone with no PL experience and not nearly as good.

What?

I didn't think Harper was first choice there. Is he?