Most of which were in the UEFA Cup tbf...
7 in 26 starts in the league with 19 in 40 starts overall. Quite sexy for someone with no legs imo.
4 goals from open play in an entire league season is sexy for someone the whole team rallied around?
The defence was crap but so was Shearer by then.
He may have done little as a manager overall but if we ever have another manager who gives our club anything near what he did between 92 and 97 I'll consider myself pretty bloody lucky.
No, I'd play Sissoko, Cabaye and Marveaux right now but ideally we'd buy someone capable of getting goals who is also able to receive the ball from the defence, keep it, give it and move. He'd replace Marveaux most of the time.
I like Marveaux a lot and would find it very difficult to leave him out of any midfield I picked. Also it can be argued the midfield people are suggesting with doesn't have the right combination of abilities you'd want in a midfield 3 (though its also arguable that if setup correctly they have all shown most of the abilities required in the past) But "it lacks everything"?, not even close
It's really silly tbf.
It's just based on reality. Most of your posts are based on pipe dreams, so I'll let you off taking into consideration the force of habit.
As I said, it lacks everything. Creativity, dribbling, physicality, goals, ability to keep the ball in tight situations and turn it into positive possession. Marveaux, who's far from perfect absolutely strolls into that 3.
Well I know you do, as there's no tackling thunderbastard in it. But most everyone else would love it.
Aye, that's why I've been advocating dropping Tiote all season while the likes of you were saying he'd be great if he'd just 'keep it simple'. I've no interest in a pure tackler. And I'd imagine about 3 or 4 people would 'love' such a midfield. The rest see it for what it is.