Ronaldo

I've said that I rate him and he's going to be a great player. I just see his weaknesses as being exactly what a lot of people said were his strengths, namely his physical strength and his passing.

Yes.

Marveaux's just a complete crock, man.

One of Norwich, Sunlun and Wigan would be great. Horrible clubs.

Um yeah "showed up" feel free to google it, find the synonym, whatever you need to take it on board. Hahahaha! The last paragraph. Genuinely, you talk utter nonsense. So Cabaye was good in possession on France, looks pretty good here? Remy is doing okay for himself? You clearly didn't see the arsenal game as you've chosen (quite sensibly) to ignore that jibe. That was the Champions league. Pretty good standard. Not sure how you can comment on the French league when you've quite clearly never watched it. It's frightening how little you know about football. "Obnoxious WUM". Sounds about right Aye that's it, the other day I was a cunt, keep the insults coming. We both know there's more chance of you getting a job than saying this rubbish to my face. All of our players are top quality, as per usual. Can't wait to see what the next bunch of excuses are when AP gets the boot.

Showed up. Looking good in possession in France is about as much use to us as Gouffran being a good winger in France. Doesn't mean a thing in this league. Players are in a different league technically, physically and mentally over here.

Aye OK, the French league is similar in quality to the PL and all those misplaced passes are Pardew's fault. We know it, so get back to inventing games that never happened.

I know you've seen absolutely loads of him so i'll go along with that. He was also described as physically dominant, by the way. Completely different in this league.

We haven't played against Arsenal with him him here, man. He's good some very good qualities but ability in possession isn't one of them.

Arshavin is the Ralph Macchio of football.

Parker is a very good footballer who didn't settle in the area.

I'm sure he could also fill Tiotes role as a DM if things don't work out at the back. No fucking thanks. He's nowhere near good enough in possession for that.

1) He won't. 2) What's remotely funny or witty about that?

True story. Can be done, though.

Quite easily actually, not that there's much credibility to this silly discussion.

It'll be very difficult to get the same type of defender but it won't be that difficult finding one equally as effective defensively imo, but it'll cost.

We were useless with and without Ba.

One thing's for sure, we can't facilitate his learning curve.

Aye but he's no leader Totally agree BL. He makes a colossal difference, the colossus that he is. Had we not spent money in January we'd have gone down without a whimper. Something tells me you wouldn't be running around calling him a leader then.

The real Man U fans will welcome him and give him time. Who cares what the rest think? Well, the non-real fans make out for like 99,9% of their fanbase We know.

Players who suit winning games would be a start.

The real Man U fans will welcome him and give him time. Who cares what the rest think?

When did he say that? In one of the local papers. Link? couldn't have been recently - he's laid into the management and the players, especially over the clique rumours and divisions between the French and others That's exactly what I'm thinking. Stifler making stuff up, though, surely not?

When did he say that? In one of the local papers. Link?

At least he's speaking from the heart and actually speaking on behalf of the fans to an extent, not like that blinkered old nutcase Moncur.