Jump to content

junkhead

Member
  • Posts

    5,449
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by junkhead

  1. junkhead

    Jonas Gutierrez

    didn't he sign for Rangers in the summer?
  2. I was just stating some FACTS man
  3. maybe they tried calling him but he was busy TWEETING about his worthless self, the fucking idiot
  4. Isn't that about the same as you paid him? Although it was probably more justified at the time you bought him.. Anyway, am I wrong or is he still France's captain?
  5. Aye, we're struggling to score goals so lets sell our best striker, ingenius. Yea ok, selling him now would be a massive gamble. I actually like the guy but despite his current fine form, he's been injured for at least 3 months every season for the last 10 years. Call me pessimistic but I can't see that changing. If we get a good offer in the summer we should sell.. same with Nolan and Smith.
  6. I'd sell Ameobi and get Beckford and some remotely creative player - George Boyd, Chris Cohen or Kris Commons
  7. pah, thought he had left in the summer. not a bad player
  8. very surprised by this.. looking at the Villa forum it seems that some of them even prefer Heskey :/
  9. I agree. I reckon we'd get Beckford if we offer £1.5m + Ranger for rest of season. That would suit both parties as I feel Ranger would thrive at Leeds and Beckford would be ideal for us. Anything other than them getting a proven goalscorer to replace beckford is not a suitable deal for them atall. I think Ranger will improve, but that takes time & its a risk in general let alone using him to replace someone whos already scored 20 this season. Carrolls the same, theyd laugh off both offers. Just what kind of a proven goalscorer can a League 1 Leeds attract now? Somebody like Kevin Lisbie, Lee Hughes or Brett Pitman. Not sure if they'll have better options than Carroll and Ranger. They'd snap our hands off if we offered Nile Ranger, I'm not sure if he would go there though.
  10. Sure, but it makes him a useful option for the 'heavy' target man role. You're right about his weaknesses but if he didn't have them he'd be plaing for Barca and be called Zlatan.
  11. weed They're obviously different type of players but Carroll often controls the ball with at least one fucker on his back.. where I come from this passes for good ball control for a target man. Lovenkrands' game in theory should be about pace and going past players, but he's totally unable to dribble, especially in short spaces. Usually he'd get his head down and his second/third touch would be far too heavy
  12. tbh, I think they're both ok for such big fuckers.. as far as 'touch' goes. Certainly Harewood and Lovenkrands are much worse. Shola is arguably the more agile player on the deck but I'm sure that if they're up against each other for a high ball, Carroll will win it every time.
  13. eyo niggas.. you getting all moral and shit again? cut the lad some slack, so he split with some bitch.. who cares
×
×
  • Create New...