Superior Acuña

nothing to get excited about, but im not complaining. adds to midfield's and attack depth, which we were lacking in

nothing to get excited about, but im not complaining. adds to midfield's and attack depth, which we were lacking in

i always thought shepherd wasnt a nice guy, but genuinely cared about the club and wasnt afraid to back his manager with cash - seems he hasnt done that this time though i agree with s9 though, i just think surely we could squeeze a defender in.

he's old, lazy and hugely inconsistent - sometimes class, but too rarely. if he's free i could accept it - but i'd still be hugely dissipointed we didnt get someone better. rossi is short term, so we want a long term as our other. when he was at leeds id have taken him. he was the closest to shearer around, but now in his 30s, after struggling for a game at boro....

did you ever see luque pulling into space asking for the ball, cos i didnt? luque wasnt interested. an example, perfect ball across the box by duff, and what the hell was luque doing? he shouldve been throwing himself at it. and even greedy midfielders does not give a player bad touch Mate Luque was miles away from that cross...So in other words Duff's cross was inaccurate and that is how he was most of the game last night...His end product was poor... You think Duff would have done better as a lone out and out striker yesterday ? Luque was in no place to recieve the ball, he didnt want it! and yes i do. he may not have great results, but he would make genuine attempts to get the ball and he would actually be able to control a ball. i want luque to succeed, but i cant think of any excuses as the lone striker one simply doesnt account for his apparent lack of football ability. titus looked more like a footballer last night. i believe ive seen luque in every performance but fulham away, and that most certainly was not an off day. an example of a player playing out of position and doing alright. dyer did decent in attack, much better than luque. and again i stress a player should have a good touch wherever he is on the pitch exactly. watch him 'try' to win a header. he was doing exactly what i used to do when i didnt really want to wina header from a big gk kick

did you ever see luque pulling into space asking for the ball, cos i didnt? luque wasnt interested. an example, perfect ball across the box by duff, and what the hell was luque doing? he shouldve been throwing himself at it. and even greedy midfielders does not give a player bad touch

i really want to like luque and im not one to get on his back, but in a newcastle shirt he just doesnt have it and he doesnt seem interested. he was very poor AGAIN tonight. people can say he's on his own whatever, but im sorry that's no excuse. you could say that for some things - but that doesnt give a player a bad touch. he just doesnt look like he can control a ball. apart from that he often doesnt look like he wants it - watch him 'try' to wina header, he doesnt try at all he just half-heartedly sticks his head in for show. and he couldnt read duff at all. it really worries me that if shola or martins get injured we're left with him, or worse, both geet injured! bluesigh.gif

imagine shearer v keane on the touchline as managers in a derby hopefuly that wont actually happen cos that would mean keanes done well and kept the job a while

im sorry but theres no way the mackems can be happy with that after niall claimed a "world class manager". how can he be classed as world class when he's never done it before - and im not sure he's capable tbh. its lucky for him cos i bet noone else would take him - and he wouldnt have a chance down the road if he wasnt irish.

this is amazing

transfer them. i got rid of rooney ready for the 3 match ban

check it out: best leagues http://fantasy.premierleague.com/M/stats.mc?stat=bestleagues (newcastle-online there if you look) sorry if posted